IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0297819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal three-part tariff pricing and marketing strategies for consumer overconfidence

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Merdikawati
  • Shi-Woei Lin
  • Ruey Huei Yeh

Abstract

Experts in traditional pricing literature often assume that consumers are rational in their purchasing decisions, and tend to ignore the effect of psychological behavior. One of the fundamental irrational psychological behaviors is overconfidence, which refers to overestimation. The benefits of three-part tariffs under demand uncertainty caused by overconfident consumers have been demonstrated in various forms. In the present study, we investigate the design of a three-part tariff pricing plan when consumers are overconfident in the sense of overestimating their amount of service usage or consumption. An analytical model and a numerical analysis are carried out using a genetic algorithm approach to determine the optimal three-part tariff and to compare other tariff structures (e.g., two-part tariff and menu of three-part tariff) to investigate the critical factors influencing their performance. With overconfidence in consumers, service providers need clear direction on how to optimally implement a three-part pricing strategy. Specifically, we observe the effect of overconfidence on the profitability of service providers, and their other performance in general. Thus, service providers are given clear guidance on when to offer three-part tariffs and alternative structures to overconfident consumers and push marketing plans to increase their profits and market share.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Merdikawati & Shi-Woei Lin & Ruey Huei Yeh, 2024. "Optimal three-part tariff pricing and marketing strategies for consumer overconfidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297819
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297819
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297819&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0297819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcin Rzeszutek & Antoine Godin & Adam Szyszka & Stanislas Augier, 2021. "Managerial overconfidence in capital structure decisions and its link to aggregate demand: An agent-based model perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-33, August.
    2. Youngsoo Kim & Rahul Telang & William B. Vogt & Ramayya Krishnan, 2010. "An Empirical Analysis of Mobile Voice Service and SMS: A Structural Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 234-252, February.
    3. Leeat Yariv & David Laibson, 2004. "Safety in Markets: An Impossibility Theorem for Dutch Books," 2004 Meeting Papers 867, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    4. Michael D. Grubb, 2009. "Selling to Overconfident Consumers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1770-1807, December.
    5. Xavier Gabaix & David Laibson, 2018. "Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia and information suppression in competitive markets," Chapters, in: Victor J. Tremblay & Elizabeth Schroeder & Carol Horton Tremblay (ed.), Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization, chapter 3, pages 40-74, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, December.
    7. Scott M. Gilpatric, 2009. "Slippage in Rebate Programs and Present-Biased Preferences," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 229-238, 03-04.
    8. , & ,, 2008. "Consumer optimism and price discrimination," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 3(4), December.
    9. Stefano DellaVigna & Ulrike Malmendier, 2004. "Contract Design and Self-Control: Theory and Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(2), pages 353-402.
    10. Anja Lambrecht & Katja Seim & Bernd Skiera, 2007. "Does Uncertainty Matter? Consumer Behavior Under Three-Part Tariffs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 698-710, 09-10.
    11. Jian Liu & Hui Zhou & Miyu Wan & Lu Liu, 2019. "How Does Overconfidence Affect Decision Making of the Green Product Manufacturer?," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, April.
    12. Kim Huat Goh & Jesse C. Bockstedt, 2013. "The Framing Effects of Multipart Pricing on Consumer Purchasing Behavior of Customized Information Good Bundles," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 334-351, June.
    13. Adib Bagh & Hemant K. Bhargava, 2013. "How to Price Discriminate When Tariff Size Matters," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 111-126, August.
    14. Gadi Fibich & Roy Klein & Oded Koenigsberg & Eitan Muller, 2017. "Optimal Three-Part Tariff Plans," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1177-1189, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael D. Grubb, 2015. "Overconfident Consumers in the Marketplace," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(4), pages 9-36, Fall.
    2. Stephen Leider & Özge Şahin, 2014. "Contracts, Biases, and Consumption of Access Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2198-2222, September.
    3. Shi-Woei Lin & Silvia Merdikawati & Shan-Fei Wu & Ruey-Huei Yeh, 2023. "Optimization and analysis of three-part tariff pricing strategies," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(4), pages 1223-1262, December.
    4. Inderst, Roman & Peitz, Martin, 2012. "Informing consumers about their own preferences," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 417-428.
    5. Andrzej Baniak & Peter Grajzl, 2014. "Controlling Product Risks when Consumers are Heterogeneously Overconfident: Producer Liability vs. Minimum Quality Standard Regulation," CESifo Working Paper Series 5003, CESifo.
    6. Michael Grubb, 2015. "Behavioral Consumers in Industrial Organization: An Overview," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(3), pages 247-258, November.
    7. Fabian Herweg & Konrad Mierendorff, 2013. "Uncertain Demand, Consumer Loss Aversion, And Flat-Rate Tariffs," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 399-432, April.
    8. Ran Spiegler, 2019. "Behavioral Economics and the Atheoretical Style," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 173-194, May.
    9. Antler, Yair, 2018. "Multilevel Marketing: Pyramid-Shaped Schemes or Exploitative Scams?," CEPR Discussion Papers 13054, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Gadi Fibich & Roy Klein & Oded Koenigsberg & Eitan Muller, 2017. "Optimal Three-Part Tariff Plans," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1177-1189, October.
    11. Mark Armstrong, 2016. "Nonlinear Pricing," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 583-614, October.
    12. Antonio Rosato, 2016. "Selling substitute goods to loss-averse consumers: limited availability, bargains, and rip-offs," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 47(3), pages 709-733, August.
    13. Chen, Jiawei & Jiang, Lai & Syed Shah, Saad Andalib, 2022. "An empirical model of the effects of “bill shock” regulation in mobile telecommunication markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. Michael D. Grubb, 2009. "Selling to Overconfident Consumers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1770-1807, December.
    15. Jianqing Fisher Wu & Banafsheh Behzad, 2023. "Optimal three-part tariff pricing with Spence-Mirrlees reservation prices," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 97(2), pages 233-258, April.
    16. Paul Heidhues & Botond Kőszegi, 2015. "On the Welfare Costs of Naiveté in the US Credit-Card Market," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(3), pages 341-354, November.
    17. Michael D. Grubb, 2015. "Behavioral Consumers in Industrial Organization," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 879, Boston College Department of Economics.
    18. Downs, Justin, 2024. "Screening, overconfidence, and competition’s effect on market efficiency," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Griffin, Míde & Lyons, Sean & Mohan, Gretta & Joseph, Merin & Domhnaill, Ciarán Mac & Evans, John, 2022. "Intra-operator mobile plan switching: Evidence from linked survey and billing microdata," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7).
    20. Oren Bar‐Gill & Rebecca Stone, 2012. "Pricing Misperceptions: Explaining Pricing Structure in the Cell Phone Service Market," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 430-456, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.