IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0295241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal scale sizes and average-profit efficiency under uncertainty: A chance-constrained DEA approach

Author

Listed:
  • Leila Parhizkar Miyandehi
  • Alireza Amirteimoori
  • Sohrab Kordrostami
  • Mansour Soufi

Abstract

When the costs of the inputs and outputs of the units under evaluation are known, the evaluation of the profit efficiency of the units is one of the most significant evaluations that can provide valuable information about them. In this research, first, a new definition of the optimal scale size based on the maximization of the average measure of profit efficiency is presented. The average measure of profit efficiency develops the concept of economic efficiency measure by introducing a more accurate measure of efficiency compared to the measure of comparative and profit efficiency. It has been shown that the average measure of profit efficiency in a convex space is equivalent to the measure of profit efficiency in constant returns to scale technology, and then, some models are presented to calculate profit efficiency in a stochastic environment, to increase the ability of profit models in real examples by considering the calculation errors of inputs and outputs. Finally, the proposed method is used in an empirical example to calculate the average profit efficiency of a set of postal areas in Iran.

Suggested Citation

  • Leila Parhizkar Miyandehi & Alireza Amirteimoori & Sohrab Kordrostami & Mansour Soufi, 2024. "Optimal scale sizes and average-profit efficiency under uncertainty: A chance-constrained DEA approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295241
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295241
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295241&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0295241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Ruggiero, 2004. "Data envelopment analysis with stochastic data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 1008-1012, September.
    2. repec:bla:scandj:v:87:y:1985:i:4:p:594-604 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi, 1999. "DEA Duality on Returns to Scale (RTS) in Production and Cost Analyses: An Occurrence of Multiple Solutions and Differences Between Production-Based and Cost-Based RTS Estimates," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1593-1608, November.
    4. William Cooper & Zhimin Huang & Vedran Lelas & Susan Li & Ole Olesen, 1998. "Chance Constrained Programming Formulations for Stochastic Characterizations of Efficiency and Dominance in DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 53-79, January.
    5. Baumol, William J & Panzar, John C & Willig, Robert D, 1983. "Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure: Reply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(3), pages 491-496, June.
    6. Thanh Ngo & Kan Wai Hong Tsui, 2022. "Estimating the confidence intervals for DEA efficiency scores of Asia-Pacific airlines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3411-3434, September.
    7. Dariush Akbarian, 2020. "Overall profit Malmquist productivity index under data uncertainty," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Mohammad Abdul Matin Chowdhury & Razali Haron, 2021. "The efficiency of Islamic Banks in the Southeast Asia (SEA) Region," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Nishant Agrawal, 2021. "An integrated benchmarking efficiency analysis of the Indian banking industry using data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(5), pages 671-692.
    10. Zhimin Huang & Susan Li, 2001. "Stochastic DEA Models With Different Types of Input-Output Disturbances," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 95-113, March.
    11. Panagiotis Mitropoulos & Panagiotis D. Zervopoulos & Ioannis Mitropoulos, 2020. "Measuring performance in the presence of noisy data with targeted desirable levels: evidence from healthcare units," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 537-566, November.
    12. Finn Førsund & Lennart Hjalmarsson, 2004. "Are all Scales Optimal in DEA? Theory and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 25-48, January.
    13. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    14. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2019. "Stochastic efficiency measures for production units with correlated data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 278-287.
    15. Cooper, William W. & Deng, H. & Huang, Zhimin & Li, Susan X., 2004. "Chance constrained programming approaches to congestion in stochastic data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 487-501, June.
    16. Cesaroni, Giovanni & Giovannola, Daniele, 2015. "Average-cost efficiency and optimal scale sizes in non-parametric analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 121-133.
    17. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2021. "A joint chance-constrained data envelopment analysis model with random output data," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1255-1277, June.
    18. O. B. Olesen & N. C. Petersen, 1995. "Chance Constrained Efficiency Evaluation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 442-457, March.
    19. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    20. Monireh Jahani Sayyad Noveiri & Sohrab Kordrostami, 2022. "Meta-Frontier Stochastic Cost and Revenue Efficiency Analysis: An Application to Bank Branches," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06), pages 1879-1903, December.
    21. W W Cooper & H Deng & Z Huang & S X Li, 2002. "Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(12), pages 1347-1356, December.
    22. Saber Mehdizadeh & Alireza Amirteimoori & Vincent Charles & Mohammad Hassan Behzadi & Sohrab Kordrostami, 2021. "Measuring the efficiency of two-stage network processes: A satisficing DEA approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 354-366, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alireza Amirteimoori & Biresh K. Sahoo & Saber Mehdizadeh, 2023. "Data envelopment analysis for scale elasticity measurement in the stochastic case: with an application to Indian banking," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-36, December.
    2. Majid Azadi & T. C. E. Cheng & Reza Kazemi Matin & Reza Farzipoor Saen, 2024. "The COVID-19 pandemic and the performance of healthcare supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(1), pages 535-562, April.
    3. Wu, Desheng (Dash) & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2010. "Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1679-1688, December.
    4. Bolós, V.J. & Benítez, R. & Coll-Serrano, V., 2024. "Chance constrained directional models in stochastic data envelopment analysis," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    5. Vincent Charles & Ioannis E. Tsolas & Tatiana Gherman, 2018. "Satisficing data envelopment analysis: a Bayesian approach for peer mining in the banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 81-102, October.
    6. Prakashan Veettil & Stijn Speelman & Guido Huylenbroeck, 2013. "Estimating the Impact of Water Pricing on Water Use Efficiency in Semi-arid Cropping System: An Application of Probabilistically Constrained Nonparametric Efficiency Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(1), pages 55-73, January.
    7. Glover, Fred & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Amirteimoori, Alireza & Cezar, Asunur & Zadmirzaei, Majid & Susaeta, Andres, 2024. "Environmental performance evaluation in the forest sector: An extended stochastic data envelopment analysis approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. O. Olesen, 2006. "Comparing and Combining Two Approaches for Chance Constrained DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 103-119, October.
    10. Khodadadipour, M. & Hadi-Vencheh, A. & Behzadi, M.H. & Rostamy-malkhalifeh, M., 2021. "Undesirable factors in stochastic DEA cross-efficiency evaluation: An application to thermal power plant energy efficiency," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 613-628.
    11. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Adel Hatami-Marbini & Ali Emrouznejad & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2020. "Chance-constrained cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis model with random inputs and outputs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1863-1898, September.
    12. Chiang Kao & Shiang-Tai Liu, 2022. "Stochastic efficiencies of network production systems with correlated stochastic data: the case of Taiwanese commercial banks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1151-1174, August.
    13. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2009. "Stochastic data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of Taiwan commercial banks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 312-322, July.
    14. Olesen, Ole B. & Petersen, Niels Christian, 2016. "Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis—A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 2-21.
    15. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2019. "Data Envelopment Analysis and Business Analytics: The Big Data Challenges and Some Solutions," CEPA Working Papers Series WP072019, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    16. Udhayakumar, A. & Charles, V. & Kumar, Mukesh, 2011. "Stochastic simulation based genetic algorithm for chance constrained data envelopment analysis problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 387-397, August.
    17. Alireza Amirteimoori & Tofigh Allahviranloo & Maryam Nematizadeh, 2024. "A firm-specific Malmquist productivity index model for stochastic data envelopment analysis: an application to commercial banks," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Vaninsky, Alexander, 2018. "Energy-environmental efficiency and optimal restructuring of the global economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 338-348.
    19. Cherchye, L. & Post, G.T., 2001. "Methodological Advances in Dea," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-53-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Zhimin Huang & Waiman Cheung & Huiwen Wang, 2006. "Cone dominance and efficiency in DEA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 89-103, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0295241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.