IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0294980.html

Competitiveness analysis of fresh tomatoes in Indonesia: Turning comparative advantage into competitive advantage

Author

Listed:
  • Saptana
  • Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya
  • Atika Dyah Perwita
  • Fadhila Dhia Malihah
  • Irwanda Wisnu Wardhana
  • Atika Dian Pitaloka
  • Shabrina Austin Ghaisani
  • Bambang Sayaka
  • Nyak Ilham
  • Elna Karmawati
  • Mewa Ariani
  • Sri Hery Susilowati
  • Sumaryanto
  • Handewi Purwati Saliem

Abstract

Tomato commodity ranks fifth regarding vegetable export volume and value in Indonesia. The main issues with tomato production in Indonesia are seemingly its lack of variations, quantity, quality, and supply continuity. This study aimed to analyze the comparative and the competitive advantages of tomato farming, evaluate the government policy on inputs, outputs, and input-output sectors, and formulate strategic for transforming the comparative advantage into a competitive advantage. Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) and sensitivity analysis were employed as the method with the 75 farmers as the respondents and their Focus Group Discussion (FGD) involving farmer groups, agricultural extension workers, traders, and the Agricultural Service Offices in the respective regencies. The results showed that tomato farming has both its comparative and competitive advantages. Its comparative advantage was higher than its competitive advantage in both dry and wet seasons. In general, tomato farming’s comparative and competitive advantages outside Java were higher than those in Java. Meanwhile, the divergence effects of tomato agribusiness were more beneficial to consumers than producers. It indicates that improving domestic tomato production was more profitable for Indonesia than importing this commodity in terms of domestic resource use. The sensitivity analysis shows that tomato farming was relatively stable regarding productivity and price changes. The suggested strategic policies to apply are transforming tomato farming’s comparative advantage into competitive advantage through productivity enhancement, improvement of distribution efficiency, less market distortion, and government incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Saptana & Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya & Atika Dyah Perwita & Fadhila Dhia Malihah & Irwanda Wisnu Wardhana & Atika Dian Pitaloka & Shabrina Austin Ghaisani & Bambang Sayaka & Nyak Ilham & Elna Karmawati & M, 2023. "Competitiveness analysis of fresh tomatoes in Indonesia: Turning comparative advantage into competitive advantage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-29, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294980
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294980
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294980&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0294980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esterhuizen, Dirk & van Rooyen, C.J., 2006. "An inquiry into factors impacting on the competitiveness of the South African wine industry," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 45(4), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Lucy Minford & David Meenagh, 2020. "Supply-Side Policy and Economic Growth: A Case Study of the UK," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 159-193, February.
    3. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Working Papers 267, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    4. Bouet, Antoine, 2008. "The expected benefits of trade liberalization for world income and development: Opening the “black box” of global trade modeling," Food policy reviews 8, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Krugman, Paul R., 1979. "Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 469-479, November.
    6. Hart, Oliver & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 247-275, November.
    7. Saptana & Apri Laila Sayekti & Atika Dyah Perwita & Bambang Sayaka & Endro Gunawan & Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya & Nur Qomariah Hayati & Yusuf & Sumaryanto & Muhammad Prama Yufdy & Sudi Mardianto & Atika Di, 2022. "Analysis of competitive and comparative advantages of potato production in Indonesia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, February.
    8. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    9. Saptana & Endro Gunawan & Atika Dyah Perwita & Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya & Valeriana Darwis & Ening Ariningsih & Ashari, 2021. "The competitiveness analysis of shallot in Indonesia: A Policy Analysis Matrix," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Bayzidnejad, Donya & Khodaverdizadeh, Mohammad & Bonab, Sedigeh Hashemi, . "Comparative Advantage of Production and Measuring the Competitiveness of Major Crops of Urmia County by the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM)," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 11(01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aineas Mallios & Taylan Mavruk, 2025. "Do ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping to gain higher flows? An application of Benford's Law," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 1540-1563, April.
    2. Sheetal, 2025. "Relative Export Competitiveness of Three Manufacturing Industries: An Evaluation of ‘Make in India’ Initiative," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 105-116, December.
    3. Caroline Flammer, 2026. "Sustainable Finance: Tools, Effectiveness, and Challenges," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 21(1), pages 14-19, January.
    4. Song, Fenghua & Thakor, Anjan & Quinn, Robert, 2023. "Purpose, profit and social pressure," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. David J. Denis, 2024. "Is corporate finance research in decline?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 59(2), pages 257-264, May.
    6. Aaberge, Rolf & Modalsli, Jørgen & Francesconi, Marco & Vestad, Ola L., 2024. "How Business Income Measures Affect Income Inequality and the Tax Burden," IZA Discussion Papers 17458, IZA Network @ LISER.
    7. Geng, Heng & Hau, Harald & Michaely, Roni & Nguyen, Binh Hoang, 2025. "Common institutional investors and board representation in rival firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Cnossen, Femke & Nikolova, Milena, 2025. "Work meaningfulness and effort," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. S. Taniguchi, Kazuhiro, 2022. "Why Fukushima? A diachronic and multilevel comparative institutional analysis of a nuclear disaster," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Mitchell Hoffman & Christopher T. Stanton, 2024. "People, Practices, and Productivity: A Review of New Advances in Personnel Economics," NBER Working Papers 32849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Sachdeva, Kunal & Silva, André F. & Slutzky, Pablo & Xu, Billy Y., 2025. "Defunding controversial industries: Can targeted credit rationing choke firms?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Liu, Manlu & Tang, Jing & Walton, Stephanie & Zhang, Yiyang & Zhao, Xinlei, 2024. "Auditor sustainability focus and client sustainability reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. Tingting Hu & Kun You & Char-Lee Lok, 2025. "State ownership, political connection and ESG performance," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-33, February.
    14. Bonnefon, Jean-François & Landier, Augustin & Sastry, Parinitha & Thesmar, David, 2025. "The moral preferences of investors: Experimental evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    15. Zwetelina Iliewa & Elisabeth Kempf & Oliver Spalt, 2025. "Corporate Actions as Moral Issues," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_649v2, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany, revised Apr 2025.
    16. Daniel Broby & Zhenjia Yang, 2025. "What Is Green Fintech?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-23, July.
    17. Dangl, Thomas & Halling, Michael & Yu, Jin & Zechner, Josef, 2025. "Social preferences and corporate investment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    18. Khan, Sarfraz & Wald, John K., 2025. "Which governance mechanisms matter for firm pollution?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    19. Elisa Navarra, 2022. "Stock Market Response to Firms’ Misconduct," Working Papers ECARES 2022-40, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Accetturo, Antonio & Barboni, Giorgia & Cascarano, Michele & Garcia-Appendini, Emilia & Tomasi, Marco, 2022. "Credit supply and green Investments," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 615, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.