IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Bayesian structural equation modeling in construction and demolition waste management studies: Development of an extended theory of planned behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Anisah Mohamed
  • Ayed R A Alanzi
  • Azlinna Noor Azizan
  • Suzana Ariff Azizan
  • Nadia Samsudin
  • Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi

Abstract

Sustainable construction and demolition waste management relies heavily on the attitudes and actions of its constituents; nevertheless, deep analysis for introducing the best estimator is rarely attained. The main objective of this study is to perform a comparison analysis among different approaches of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in Construction and Demolition Waste Management (C&DWM) modeling based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour (Extended TPB). The introduced research model includes twelve latent variables, six independent variables, one mediator, three control variables, and one dependent variable. Maximum likelihood (ML), partial least square (PLS), and Bayesian estimators were considered in this study. The output of SEM with the Bayesian estimator was 85.8%, and among effectiveness of six main variables on C&DWM Behavioral (Depenmalaydent variables), five of them have significant relations. Meanwhile, the variation based on SEM with ML estimator was equal to 78.2%, and four correlations with dependent variable have significant relationship. At the conclusion, the R-square of SEM with the PLS estimator was equivalent to 73.4% and three correlations with the dependent variable had significant relationships. At the same time, the values of the three statistical indices include root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MPE), and mean absolute error (MSE) with involving Bayesian estimator are lower than both ML and PLS estimators. Therefore, compared to both PLS and ML, the predicted values of the Bayesian estimator are closer to the observed values. The lower values of MPE, RMSE, and MSE and the higher values of R-square will generate better goodness of fit for SEM with a Bayesian estimator. Moreover, the SEM with a Bayesian estimator revealed better data fit than both the PLS and ML estimators. The pattern shows that the relationship between research variables can change with different estimators. Hence, researchers using the SEM technique must carefully consider the primary estimator for their data analysis. The precaution is necessary because higher error means different regression coefficients in the research model.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Anisah Mohamed & Ayed R A Alanzi & Azlinna Noor Azizan & Suzana Ariff Azizan & Nadia Samsudin & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, 2024. "Application of Bayesian structural equation modeling in construction and demolition waste management studies: Development of an extended theory of planned behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290376
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290376
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290376&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bo Yu & Jiayuan Wang & Ying Liao & Huanyu Wu & Aslan B. Wong, 2021. "Determinants Affecting Purchase Willingness of Contractors towards Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Products: An Empirical Study in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Li, Jingru & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Zuo, Jian & Zhu, Jiaolan, 2015. "Designers’ attitude and behaviour towards construction waste minimization by design: A study in Shenzhen, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 29-35.
    3. Jaime A. Mesa & Carlos Fúquene-Retamoso & Aníbal Maury-Ramírez, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi & Sedigheh Moghavvemi & Che Wan Jasimah Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi & Parastoo Babashamsi & Mohammad Arashi, 2017. "Testing students’ e-learning via Facebook through Bayesian structural equation modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Segars, A. H., 1997. "Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 107-121, February.
    6. Richard Scheines & Herbert Hoijtink & Anne Boomsma, 1999. "Bayesian estimation and testing of structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 37-52, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Noudoostbeni & Kiran Kaur & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, 2018. "A Comparison of Structural Equation Modeling Approaches with DeLone & McLean’s Model: A Case Study of Radio-Frequency Identification User Satisfaction in Malaysian University Libraries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Che Wan Jasimah Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi & Maisarah Binti Hasbullah, 2015. "Firm Sustainability Performance Index Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Mahalingam Vasantha & Malaisamy Muniyandi & Chinnaiyan Ponnuraja & Ramalingam Srinivasan & Perumal Venkatesan, 2021. "Bayesian structural equation modeling for post treatment health related quality of life among tuberculosis patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Che Wan Jasimah Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi & Huang Hui & Nur Anisah Binti Mohamed @ A. Rahman & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, 2017. "Family Food Security and Children’s Environment: A Comprehensive Analysis with Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Che Wan Jasimah Wan Mohamed Radzi & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi & Ayed R. A. Alanzi & Mohd Istajib Mokhtar & Mohd Zufri Mamat & Nor Aishah Abdullah, 2019. "Analysis of Obesity among Malaysian University Students: A Combination Study with the Application of Bayesian Structural Equation Modelling and Pearson Correlation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    7. Nitin Walia & Mark Srite & Wendy Huddleston, 2016. "Eyeing the web interface: the influence of price, product, and personal involvement," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 297-333, September.
    8. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    9. Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & Freeman, Susan, 2009. "Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, February.
    10. William Philip Wall & Bilal Khalid & Mariusz Urbański & Michal Kot, 2021. "Factors Influencing Consumer’s Adoption of Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Anna Jasinenko & Josephina Steuber, 2023. "Perceived Organizational Purpose: Systematic Literature Review, Construct Definition, Measurement and Potential Employee Outcomes," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1415-1447, September.
    12. Khwanjira Ponsree & Phaninee Naruetharadhol, 2025. "Unveiling the determinants of alternative payment adoption: exploring the factors shaping generation Z’s intentions in Thailand," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-34, December.
    13. Nuri Cihan Kayaçetin & Chiara Piccardo & Alexis Versele, 2022. "Social Impact Assessment of Circular Construction: Case of Living Lab Ghent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Wei Daojiang & Li Huimin, 2014. "An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Knowledge Sharing in Project Context," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 154-169, April.
    15. Adil Mohamed Zahran Al Kindy & Ahmad Jusoh, 2018. "Work Place Empowerment: An Assessment for the Omani Civil Service Agencies," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 202-202, December.
    16. Hongping Yuan & Yu Yang & Xiaolong Xue, 2019. "Promoting Owners’ BIM Adoption Behaviors to Achieve Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Verhagen, Tibert & Meents, Selmar, 2007. "A Framework for Developing Semantic Differentials in IS research: Assessing the Meaning of Electronic Marketplace Quality (EMQ)," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    18. Chuang, Shu-Hui & Lin, Hong-Nan, 2013. "The roles of infrastructure capability and customer orientation in enhancing customer-information quality in CRM systems: Empirical evidence from Taiwan," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 271-281.
    19. Yusuf Berkay Metinal & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp, 2025. "Uncovering Barriers to Circular Construction: A Global Scientometric Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-50, February.
    20. Hee-sung Bae, 2021. "The Interaction Effect of Information Systems of Shipping and Logistics Firms and Managers’ Support for Blockchain Technology on Cooperation with Shippers for Sustainable Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.