IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0285463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding spatial effects in species distribution models

Author

Listed:
  • Iosu Paradinas
  • Janine Illian
  • Sophie Smout

Abstract

Species Distribution Models often include spatial effects which may improve prediction at unsampled locations and reduce Type I errors when identifying environmental drivers. In some cases ecologists try to ecologically interpret the spatial patterns displayed by the spatial effect. However, spatial autocorrelation may be driven by many different unaccounted drivers, which complicates the ecological interpretation of fitted spatial effects. This study aims to provide a practical demonstration that spatial effects are able to smooth the effect of multiple unaccounted drivers. To do so we use a simulation study that fit model-based spatial models using both geostatistics and 2D smoothing splines. Results show that fitted spatial effects resemble the sum of the unaccounted covariate surface(s) in each model.

Suggested Citation

  • Iosu Paradinas & Janine Illian & Sophie Smout, 2023. "Understanding spatial effects in species distribution models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-6, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285463
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285463
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0285463&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0285463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindgren, Finn & Rue, Håvard, 2015. "Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i19).
    2. David W Redding & Tim C D Lucas & Tim M Blackburn & Kate E Jones, 2017. "Evaluating Bayesian spatial methods for modelling species distributions with clumped and restricted occurrence data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cho, Daegon & Hwang, Youngdeok & Park, Jongwon, 2018. "More buzz, more vibes: Impact of social media on concert distribution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 103-113.
    2. Andre Python & Andreas Bender & Marta Blangiardo & Janine B. Illian & Ying Lin & Baoli Liu & Tim C.D. Lucas & Siwei Tan & Yingying Wen & Davit Svanidze & Jianwei Yin, 2022. "A downscaling approach to compare COVID‐19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 202-218, January.
    3. Ruiman Zhong & Paula Moraga, 2024. "Bayesian Hierarchical Models for the Combination of Spatially Misaligned Data: A Comparison of Melding and Downscaler Approaches Using INLA and SPDE," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(1), pages 110-129, March.
    4. Layla Höckerstedt & Elina Numminen & Ben Ashby & Mike Boots & Anna Norberg & Anna-Liisa Laine, 2022. "Spatially structured eco-evolutionary dynamics in a host-pathogen interaction render isolated populations vulnerable to disease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Jussi Jousimo & Otso Ovaskainen, 2016. "A Spatio-Temporally Explicit Random Encounter Model for Large-Scale Population Surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Jacqueline D. Seufert & Andre Python & Christoph Weisser & Elías Cisneros & Krisztina Kis‐Katos & Thomas Kneib, 2022. "Mapping ex ante risks of COVID‐19 in Indonesia using a Bayesian geostatistical model on airport network data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2121-2155, October.
    7. Johnson, Blair T. & Sisti, Anthony & Bernstein, Mary & Chen, Kun & Hennessy, Emily A. & Acabchuk, Rebecca L. & Matos, Michaela, 2021. "Community-level factors and incidence of gun violence in the United States, 2014–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    8. Zhang, Shen & Liu, Xin & Tang, Jinjun & Cheng, Shaowu & Qi, Yong & Wang, Yinhai, 2018. "Spatio-temporal modeling of destination choice behavior through the Bayesian hierarchical approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 537-551.
    9. Francis K.C. Hui & Nicole A. Hill & A.H. Welsh, 2022. "Assuming independence in spatial latent variable models: Consequences and implications of misspecification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 85-99, March.
    10. Damaris K. Kinyoki & Samuel O. Manda & Grainne M. Moloney & Elijah O. Odundo & James A. Berkley & Abdisalan M. Noor & Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala, 2017. "Modelling the Ecological Comorbidity of Acute Respiratory Infection, Diarrhoea and Stunting among Children Under the Age of 5 Years in Somalia," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(1), pages 164-176, April.
    11. Paige, John & Fuglstad, Geir-Arne & Riebler, Andrea & Wakefield, Jon, 2022. "Bayesian multiresolution modeling of georeferenced data: An extension of ‘LatticeKrig’," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Daniela Castro‐Camilo & Raphaël Huser & Håvard Rue, 2022. "Practical strategies for generalized extreme value‐based regression models for extremes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), September.
    13. C. Forlani & S. Bhatt & M. Cameletti & E. Krainski & M. Blangiardo, 2020. "A joint Bayesian space–time model to integrate spatially misaligned air pollution data in R‐INLA," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), December.
    14. Divan A. Burger & Sean van der Merwe & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Peter C. le Roux & Morgan J. Raath‐Krüger, 2023. "A robust mixed‐effects parametric quantile regression model for continuous proportions: Quantifying the constraints to vitality in cushion plants," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(4), pages 444-470, November.
    15. Guido Fioravanti & Michela Cameletti & Sara Martino & Giorgio Cattani & Enrico Pisoni, 2022. "A spatiotemporal analysis of NO2 concentrations during the Italian 2020 COVID‐19 lockdown," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), June.
    16. Oliver Stoner & Theo Economou, 2020. "Multivariate hierarchical frameworks for modeling delayed reporting in count data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 789-798, September.
    17. Aaron Osgood‐Zimmerman & Jon Wakefield, 2023. "A Statistical Review of Template Model Builder: A Flexible Tool for Spatial Modelling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 318-342, August.
    18. William Gonzalez Daza & Renata L. Muylaert & Thadeu Sobral-Souza & Victor Lemes Landeiro, 2023. "Malaria Risk Drivers in the Brazilian Amazon: Land Use—Land Cover Interactions and Biological Diversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Sameh Abdulah & Yuxiao Li & Jian Cao & Hatem Ltaief & David E. Keyes & Marc G. Genton & Ying Sun, 2023. "Large‐scale environmental data science with ExaGeoStatR," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), February.
    20. André Victor Ribeiro Amaral & Elias Teixeira Krainski & Ruiman Zhong & Paula Moraga, 2024. "Model-Based Geostatistics Under Spatially Varying Preferential Sampling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(4), pages 766-792, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0285463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.