IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0281431.html

NorMASS: A normative MAS-based modeling approach for simulating incentive mechanisms of Q&A communities

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Yang
  • Xinjun Mao
  • Shuo Yang
  • Menghan Wu

Abstract

Incentive mechanisms steer users in Q&A communities to achieve community goals, which need to be cautiously reviewed and revised before actual industrial application. Simulating incentive mechanisms is significant for predicting how changes in incentive mechanisms will affect community emergence, such as user answering patterns. However, due to the complexity of Q&A communities, the challenge faced by simulating incentive mechanisms lies in the difficulty of establishing micro-macro connections in the communities to simulate their emergence. To fill this gap, this paper proposes a Normative Multi-Agent System based Simulation (NorMASS) approach to simulate community emergence. The NorMASS models a Q&A community as a normative multi-agent system and adopts agents to formally express community users. Moreover, the approach provides an open-source simulator with a data generator to simulate community emergence. An evaluation of the NorMASS comparing simulation emergence with the counterpart of an actual community demonstrates that the proposed approach provides an effective solution for simulating incentive mechanisms of Q&A communities, with a similarity of 80% or above.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Yang & Xinjun Mao & Shuo Yang & Menghan Wu, 2023. "NorMASS: A normative MAS-based modeling approach for simulating incentive mechanisms of Q&A communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281431
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281431
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281431&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0281431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan Yu & Marco A. Janssen, 2020. "How Behavior Of Users Impacts The Success Of Online Q&A Communities," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Erik Choi & Chirag Shah, 2016. "User motivations for asking questions in online Q&A services," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1182-1197, May.
    3. Paulo B. Goes & Chenhui Guo & Mingfeng Lin, 2016. "Do Incentive Hierarchies Induce User Effort? Evidence from an Online Knowledge Exchange," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 497-516, September.
    4. Philip Fei Wu & Nikolaos Korfiatis, 2013. "You scratch someone's back and we'll scratch yours: Collective reciprocity in social Q&A communities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(10), pages 2069-2077, October.
    5. Yan Chen & Teck‐Hua Ho & Yong‐Mi Kim, 2010. "Knowledge Market Design: A Field Experiment at Google Answers," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 12(4), pages 641-664, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Wang & Gen Li & Kai-Lung Hui, 2022. "Monetary Incentives and Knowledge Spillover: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3549-3572, May.
    2. Minhyung Kang, 2022. "Motivational affordances and survival of new askers on social Q&A sites: The case of Stack Exchange network," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(1), pages 90-103, January.
    3. Donald Amoroso & Ricardo Lim & Francisco L. Roman, 2021. "The Effect of Reciprocity on Mobile Wallet Intention: A Study of Filipino Consumers," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 57-83, April.
    4. Gen-Yih Liao & Tzu-Ling Huang & Alan R. Dennis & Ching-I Teng, 2024. "The Influence of Media Capabilities on Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 165-183, March.
    5. Maria Marchenko & Hendrik Sonnabend, 2025. "The never-ending book: the role of new material and peer feedback in user-generated content production," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(3), pages 435-458, September.
    6. Leila Tavakoli & Hamed Zamani & Falk Scholer & William Bruce Croft & Mark Sanderson, 2022. "Analyzing clarification in asynchronous information‐seeking conversations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 449-471, March.
    7. Anya Savikhin Samek & Roman Sheremeta, 2014. "Recognizing contributors: an experiment on public goods," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(4), pages 673-690, December.
    8. Anya Savikhin & Roman Sheremeta, 2010. "Visibility of Contributions and Cost of Information: An Experiment on Public Goods," Working Papers 10-22, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    9. Zhiyu Zeng & Hengchen Dai & Dennis J. Zhang & Heng Zhang & Renyu Zhang & Zhiwei Xu & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2023. "The Impact of Social Nudges on User-Generated Content for Social Network Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 5189-5208, September.
    10. Yang, Wei & Zhou, Qing & Yu, Xianyun & Wang, Dongpeng & Li, Hui, 2019. "How to facilitate knowledge collaboration in OCs: An integrated perspective of technological and institutional measures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 21-28.
    11. Qiuju Yin & Haoyue Fan & Yijie Wang & Chenxi Guo & Xingzhi Cui, 2022. "Exploring the Peer Effect of Physicians’ and Patients’ Participation Behavior: Evidence from Online Health Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Yan Chen & Grace Jeon & Yong-Mi Kim, 2014. "A day without a search engine: an experimental study of online and offline searches," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(4), pages 512-536, December.
    13. Wenqi Shen & Yan (Lucy) Liu & Yun (Alicia) Wang, 2025. "Penalty or Reward? The Effect of Social Disincentives on Online Users’ Contributions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(8), pages 6770-6792, August.
    14. Dongmei Han & Zhiliang Pang & Lifeng He & Xiaohang Zhou & Shaohua Zhang, 2023. "Management response and user idea generation: evidence from an online open innovation community," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 381-400, December.
    15. Zhihan (Helen) Wang & Jun Li & Di (Andrew) Wu, 2023. "Mind the Gap: Gender Disparity in Online Learning Platform Interactions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 2122-2141, November.
    16. Hu, Xin & He, Liuyi & Liu, Junjun, 2022. "Status reinforcing: Unintended rating bias on online shopping platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    17. Liu, Xianwei & Han, Meini & Liu, Jianwei & Zhang, Ziqiong, 2024. "Smart users: Effort management in earning rewards," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Ni Huang & Gordon Burtch & Bin Gu & Yili Hong & Chen Liang & Kanliang Wang & Dongpu Fu & Bo Yang, 2019. "Motivating User-Generated Content with Performance Feedback: Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 327-345, January.
    19. Jingchuan Pu & Yang Liu & Yuan Chen & Liangfei Qiu & Hsing Kenneth Cheng, 2022. "What Questions Are You Inclined to Answer? Effects of Hierarchy in Corporate Q&A Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 244-264, March.
    20. Dongcheng Zhang & Hanchen Jiang & Maoshan Qiang & Kunpeng Zhang & Liangfei Qiu, 2025. "Time to Stop? An Empirical Investigation on the Consequences of Canceling Monetary Incentives on a Digital Platform," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 781-801, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0281431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.