IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0268890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of working in academia on researchers’ mental health and well-being: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Nicholls
  • Matthew Nicholls
  • Sahra Tekin
  • Danielle Lamb
  • Jo Billings

Abstract

Objective: To understand how researchers experience working in academia and the effects these experiences have on their mental health and well-being, through synthesizing published qualitative data. Method: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted to gain a comprehensive overview of what is currently known about academic researchers’ mental health and well-being. Relevant papers were identified through searching electronic databases, Google Scholar, and citation tracking. The quality of the included studies was assessed and the data was synthesised using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: 26 papers were identified and included in this review. Academic researchers’ experiences were captured under seven key themes. Job insecurity coupled with the high expectations set by the academic system left researchers at risk of poor mental health and well-being. Access to peer support networks, opportunities for career progression, and mentorship can help mitigate the stress associated with the academic job role, however, under-represented groups in academia are at risk of unequal access to resources, support, and opportunities. Conclusion: To improve researchers’ well-being at work, scientific/academic practice and the system’s concept of what a successful researcher should look like, needs to change. Further high-quality qualitative research is needed to better understand how systemic change, including tackling inequality and introducing better support systems, can be brought about more immediately and effectively. Further research is also needed to better understand the experiences and support needs of post-doctoral and more senior researchers, as there is a paucity of literature in this area. Trial registration: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021232480).

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Nicholls & Matthew Nicholls & Sahra Tekin & Danielle Lamb & Jo Billings, 2022. "The impact of working in academia on researchers’ mental health and well-being: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0268890
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0268890
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0268890&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0268890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gibbons, Stephen & Neumayer, Eric & Perkins, Richard, 2015. "Student satisfaction, league tables and university applications: Evidence from Britain," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 148-164.
    2. Sarah Masefield, 2019. "Use peer support to improve well-being and research outcomes," Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7769), pages 407-408, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marisa Cameron & Bryan C. McCannon & Katherine Starr, 2023. "AACSB accreditation and student demand," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 90(2), pages 317-340, October.
    2. Rhys J. Williams, 2022. "The effect of casual teaching on student satisfaction: evidence from the UK," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 91-111, January.
    3. I. Etzo & R. Paci & C. Usala, 2024. "Brain gain vs. brain drain. The effects of universities' mobile students on territorial inequalities," Working Paper CRENoS 202411, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    4. Singleton, Carl & Bell, Adrian R. & Chung, Andy & Reade, J. James & Urquhart, Andrew, 2024. "Scoring goals: The impact of English Premier League football teams on local university admissions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    5. Mehmet Pinar, 2023. "Do research performances of universities and disciplines in England converge or diverge? An assessment of the progress between research excellence frameworks in 2014 and 2021," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(10), pages 5731-5766, October.
    6. Biancardi, Daniele & Bratti, Massimiliano, 2019. "The effect of introducing a Research Evaluation Exercise on student enrolment: Evidence from Italy," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 73-93.
    7. Bauer, Anna & Gerner, Hans-Dieter & Jäckle, Robert & Mummert, Uwe & Sandner, Malte & Seebens, Holger, 2023. "OHM Happiness Report (OHR)," MPRA Paper 117403, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Laurent Scaringella & Anna Górska & Dennis Calderon & Jose Benitez, 2022. "Should we teach in hybrid mode or fully online? A theory and empirical investigation on the service–profit chain in MBAs," Post-Print hal-03519796, HAL.
    9. Jacqmin, Julien & Lefebvre, Mathieu, 2021. "The effect of international accreditations on students’ revealed preferences: Evidence from French Business schools," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. David I. Stern & Richard S. J. Tol, 2021. "Depth and breadth relevance in citation metrics," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 59(3), pages 961-977, July.
    11. Kumar Biswas & Sudipta Bose & Millicent Chang & Syed Shams, 2023. "Determinants and consequences of student satisfaction in Australian Universities: Evidence from QILT Surveys," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 1821-1850, June.
    12. Britton, Jack & van der Erve, Laura & Belfield, Chris & Vignoles, Anna & Dickson, Matt & Zhu, Yu & Walker, Ian & Dearden, Lorraine & Sibieta, Luke & Buscha, Franz, 2022. "How much does degree choice matter?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Kübra Akyol Özcan, 2023. "Sustainability Ranking of Turkish Universities with Different Weighting Approaches and the TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Julien Jacqmin & Mathieu Lefebvre, 2021. "The effect of international accreditations on students’ decisions: Evidence from French business schools," Working Papers of BETA 2021-06, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    15. Biancardi, Daniele & Bratti, Massimiliano, 2018. "The Effect of the First Italian Research Evaluation Exercise on Student Enrolment Choices," IZA Discussion Papers 11302, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Yuta Kuroda, 2022. "What does the disclosure of school quality information bring? The effect through the housing market," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 125-149, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0268890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.