IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0264590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing port service quality: An application of the extension fuzzy AHP and importance-performance analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Thang Quyet Nguyen
  • Lan Thi Tuyet Ngo
  • Nguyen Tan Huynh
  • Thanh Le Quoc
  • Long Van Hoang

Abstract

It is argued that ports are playing a crucial role in developing nations’ economy. Still, solutions to improving port service quality (PSQ) to boost ports’ competitive capacity is questionable. Hence, this study aims to investigate port service quality (PSQ) by using integration of the extension Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) from port users’ perspectives. From the relevant literature and expert interview, the hierarchical structure of PSQ embracing six dimensions with 29 criteria was first established. To test the research model, the Dong Nai port joint stock company (DNPC) and their port-service users were empirically investigated. It is found that: (1) the importance degree of dimensions is ranked as follow: empathy (21.07%), tangibles (20.15%), assurance (15.97%), reliability (15.54%), responsiveness (12.53%), diversity (14.74%); (2) for criteria of PSQ, top five criteria concerned by shipping companies and ocean freight forwarders comprise: "proactive provision of vessel schedules", "cargo handling facilities and equipment", "detailed schedule", "accuracy and consistency of schedules", and "geographical location"; (3) there are four service attributes (SAs) needing to prioritize for improvement, including "perfect transportation of cargos", "ability in dealing with cargo damage", "willingness in helping customers", "provision of special cargo-related services". The practical policy is that port authorities should transfer the limited resources from SAs in Quadrant IV to Quadrant II to enhance the PSQ.

Suggested Citation

  • Thang Quyet Nguyen & Lan Thi Tuyet Ngo & Nguyen Tan Huynh & Thanh Le Quoc & Long Van Hoang, 2022. "Assessing port service quality: An application of the extension fuzzy AHP and importance-performance analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0264590
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264590
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264590&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0264590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castelein, R.B. & Geerlings, H. & van Duin, J.H.R., 2019. "Divergent effects of container port choice incentives on users' behavior," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 82-93.
    2. Phadermrod, Boonyarat & Crowder, Richard M. & Wills, Gary B., 2019. "Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 194-203.
    3. Pérez, Ivone & González, María Manuela & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2020. "Do specialisation and port size affect port efficiency? Evidence from cargo handling service in Spanish ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 234-249.
    4. Notteboom, Theo E. & Parola, Francesco & Satta, Giovanni & Pallis, Athanasios A., 2017. "The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 158-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theo Notteboom & Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2023. "Maritime container terminal infrastructure, network corporatization, and global terminal operators: Implications for international business policy," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 67-83, March.
    2. Zhu, Shengda & Fu, Xiaowen & Bell, Michael G.H., 2021. "Container shipping line port choice patterns in East Asia the effects of port affiliation and spatial dependence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Liang-Ching Chen, 2023. "An Improved Corpus-Based NLP Method for Facilitating Keyword Extraction: An Example of the COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Corpus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Jagan Jeevan & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Exploring seaport - dry ports dyadic integration to meet the increase in container vessels size," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Jiang, Xiaodan & Fan, Houming & Luo, Meifeng & Xu, Zhenlin, 2020. "Strategic port competition in multimodal network development considering shippers’ choice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 68-89.
    6. Jiannan, Cheng & feng, Lian & Zhongzhen, Yang, 2020. "Impacts of the choice habits of port users on the effects and efficiencies of port investment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 203-214.
    7. Min Wang & Meng Ji & Xiaofen Wu & Kexin Deng & Xiaodong Jing, 2023. "Analysis on Evaluation and Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Port Cluster Eco-Efficiency: Case Study from the Yangtze River Delta in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Yang, Dong & Li, Lu & Notteboom, Theo, 2022. "Chinese investment in overseas container terminals: The role of investor attributes in achieving a higher port competitiveness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 112-122.
    9. Claudio Ferrari & Alessio Tei, 2020. "Effects of BRI strategy on Mediterranean shipping transport," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    11. Qiaoyu Peng & Chuanxu Wang, 2022. "Ship space sharing strategies with different rental modes: How does NVOCCs cooperate with booking platform?," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 3003-3035, July.
    12. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    13. Debasish Roy, 2021. "An Exploration in SWOT Function and Formulation of SWOT Index (SWOTIN): A Cross-Country Empirical Study (2006 – 2015)," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 10(2), pages 53-66, December.
    14. Liehui Wang & Yuanbo Zheng & César Ducruet & Fan Zhang, 2019. "Investment Strategy of Chinese Terminal Operators along the “21st-Century Maritime Silk Road”," Post-Print halshs-02092097, HAL.
    15. Carla M. A. Pinto & Jorge Mendonça & Lurdes Babo & Francisco J. G. Silva & José L. R. Fernandes, 2022. "Analyzing the Implementation of Lean Methodologies and Practices in the Portuguese Industry: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.
    16. Adolf K. Y. Ng & Kenneth Wong & Eva C. Shou & Changmin Jiang, 2019. "Geography and institutional change: insights from a container terminal operator," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(3), pages 334-352, September.
    17. Macias, A. & Kandidayeni, M. & Boulon, L. & Trovão, J.P., 2021. "Fuel cell-supercapacitor topologies benchmark for a three-wheel electric vehicle powertrain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    18. Rykała Wojciech & Dąbrowska Dominika, 2020. "Risk assessment for groundwater in the region of municipal landfill systems in Tychy-Urbanowice (Southern Poland)," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 9-17, March.
    19. Yoshihisa Sugimura & Kazuhiko Ishiguro & Azuma Kato, 2022. "Possibility of Sustainable Entry into Overseas Port Operation Markets by Japanese Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Tsakiridis, Andreas & Mateo-Mantecón, Ingrid & O'Connor, Eamonn & Hynes, Stephen & O'Donoghue, Cathal, 2021. "Efficiency benchmarking of Irish and North Atlantic Spanish ports: Implications for blue growth," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0264590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.