IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0263505.html

Arsenic in drinking water: An analysis of global drinking water regulations and recommendations for updates to protect public health

Author

Listed:
  • Seth H Frisbie
  • Erika J Mitchell

Abstract

Evidence-based public health policy often comes years or decades after the underlying scientific breakthrough. The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) provisional 10 μg/L arsenic (As) drinking water guideline was set in 1993 based on “analytical achievability.” In 2011, an additional proviso of “treatment performance” was added; a health-based risk assessment would lead to a lower and more protective guideline. Since the WHO does not require United Nations member states to submit copies of national drinking water regulations, there is no complete database of national drinking water standards or guidelines. In this study, we collated and analyzed all drinking water regulations for As from national governments worldwide. We found regulations for 176 countries. Of these countries, 136 have drinking water regulations that specify 10 μg/L As or less, while 40 have regulations that allow more than 10 μg/L of As; we could not find any evidence of regulations for 19 countries. The number of people living in countries that do not meet the WHO’s guideline constitutes 32% of the global population. Global As regulations are also strongly tied to national income, with high income countries more likely to meet the WHO’s guideline. In this study, we examined the health risk assessments that show a clear need for reducing As exposure to levels far below the current WHO provisional guideline. We also show that advances in analytical chemistry, drinking water treatment, and the possibility of accessing alternative drinking water supplies without As suggest that both low-income countries with limited resources and high-income countries with adequate resources can adopt a lower and more protective national drinking water standards or guidelines for As. Thus, we recommend that regulators and stake holders of all nations reassess the possibilities for improving public health and reducing health care expenses by adopting more stringent regulations for As in drinking water.

Suggested Citation

  • Seth H Frisbie & Erika J Mitchell, 2022. "Arsenic in drinking water: An analysis of global drinking water regulations and recommendations for updates to protect public health," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-42, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0263505
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263505
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263505&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0263505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sen Gupta, Bhaskar & Chatterjee, S. & Rott, U & Kauffman, H & Bandopadhyay, Amitava & DeGroot, W & Nag, N.K. & Carbonell-Barrachina, A.A. & Mukhopadhyay, Soumyadeep, 2009. "A simple chemical free arsenic removal method for community water supply - A case study from West Bengal, India," MPRA Paper 60684, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2009.
    2. repec:wbk:wbpubs:33044 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. -, 2007. "Overview of the water profile and the capacity of national institutions to implement integrated water resources management (Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada)," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 27629, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rayssa Horacio Lopes & Cícera Renata Diniz Vieira Silva & Ísis de Siqueira Silva & Pétala Tuani Cândido de Oliveira Salvador & Léo Heller & Severina Alice da Costa Uchôa, 2022. "Worldwide Surveillance Actions and Initiatives of Drinking Water Quality: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Hollynd Boyden & Mayela Gillan & Javier Molina & Ashok Gadgil & Winston Tseng, 2023. "Community Perceptions of Arsenic Contaminated Drinking Water and Preferences for Risk Communication in California’s San Joaquin Valley," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Ricci Nicomel & Karen Leus & Karel Folens & Pascal Van Der Voort & Gijs Du Laing, 2015. "Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Water: Current Status and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. -, 2010. "Millennium development goals: advances in environmentally sustainable development in Latin America and the Caribbean," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2937 edited by Eclac.
    3. Thomas, Herbert & Williams, Rudolph & Cadogon, Elon & Crichlow, Marilyn & Dubrie, Artie & Miranda, Priscilla & Moultrie, Stacey & Parsram, Kemraj, 2022. "Synthesis of policy interventions responding to integrated water resources management challenges in the Caribbean SIDS," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 47739, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    4. -, 2011. "An assessment of the economic impact of climate change on the water sector in Grenada," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 38580, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0263505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.