IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0240940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximising the clustering coefficient of networks and the effects on habitat network robustness

Author

Listed:
  • Henriette Heer
  • Lucas Streib
  • Ralf B Schäfer
  • Stefan Ruzika

Abstract

The robustness of networks against node failure and the response of networks to node removal has been studied extensively for networks such as transportation networks, power grids, and food webs. In many cases, a network’s clustering coefficient was identified as a good indicator for network robustness. In ecology, habitat networks constitute a powerful tool to represent metapopulations or -communities, where nodes represent habitat patches and links indicate how these are connected. Current climate and land-use changes result in decline of habitat area and its connectivity and are thus the main drivers for the ongoing biodiversity loss. Conservation efforts are therefore needed to improve the connectivity and mitigate effects of habitat loss. Habitat loss can easily be modelled with the help of habitat networks and the question arises how to modify networks to obtain higher robustness. Here, we develop tools to identify which links should be added to a network to increase the robustness. We introduce two different heuristics, Greedy and Lazy Greedy, to maximize the clustering coefficient if multiple links can be added. We test these approaches and compare the results to the optimal solution for different generic networks including a variety of standard networks as well as spatially explicit landscape based habitat networks. In a last step, we simulate the robustness of habitat networks before and after adding multiple links and investigate the increase in robustness depending on both the number of added links and the heuristic used. We found that using our heuristics to add links to sparse networks such as habitat networks has a greater impact on the clustering coefficient compared to randomly adding links. The Greedy algorithm delivered optimal results in almost all cases when adding two links to the network. Furthermore, the robustness of networks increased with the number of additional links added using the Greedy or Lazy Greedy algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Henriette Heer & Lucas Streib & Ralf B Schäfer & Stefan Ruzika, 2020. "Maximising the clustering coefficient of networks and the effects on habitat network robustness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240940
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240940
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240940&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0240940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ash, J. & Newth, D., 2007. "Optimizing complex networks for resilience against cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 380(C), pages 673-683.
    2. B. Berche & C. von Ferber & T. Holovatch & Yu. Holovatch, 2009. "Resilience of public transport networks against attacks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(1), pages 125-137, September.
    3. Lucas Cuadra & Sancho Salcedo-Sanz & Javier Del Ser & Silvia Jiménez-Fernández & Zong Woo Geem, 2015. "A Critical Review of Robustness in Power Grids Using Complex Networks Concepts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-55, August.
    4. Matthew D. Holland & Alan Hastings, 2008. "Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7223), pages 792-794, December.
    5. Streib, Lucas & Kattwinkel, Mira & Heer, Henriette & Ruzika, Stefan & Schäfer, Ralf B., 2020. "How does habitat connectivity influence the colonization success of a hemimetabolous aquatic insect? - A modeling approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 416(C).
    6. Almpanidou, Vasiliki & Mazaris, Antonios D. & Mertzanis, Yorgos & Avraam, Ioannis & Antoniou, Ioannis & Pantis, John D. & Sgardelis, Stefanos P., 2014. "Providing insights on habitat connectivity for male brown bears: A combination of habitat suitability and landscape graph-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 286(C), pages 37-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neelu Chaudhary & Hardeo Kumar Thakur & Rinky Dwivedi, 2022. "An ensemble model to optimize modularity in dynamic bipartite networks," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2248-2260, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cerqueti, Roy & Ferraro, Giovanna & Iovanella, Antonio, 2019. "Measuring network resilience through connection patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 320-329.
    2. Gopal R. Patil & B. K. Bhavathrathan, 2016. "Effect Of Traffic Demand Variation On Road Network Resilience," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01n02), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Cats, Oded & Jenelius, Erik, 2015. "Planning for the unexpected: The value of reserve capacity for public transport network robustness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-61.
    4. Panyam, Varuneswara & Huang, Hao & Davis, Katherine & Layton, Astrid, 2019. "Bio-inspired design for robust power grid networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Tio, Adonis E. & Hill, David J. & Ma, Jin, 2020. "Can graph properties determine future grid adequacy for power injection diversity?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 550(C).
    6. Aybike Ulusan & Ozlem Ergun, 2018. "Restoration of services in disrupted infrastructure systems: A network science approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Dongli, Duan & Chengxing, Wu & Yuchen, Zhai & Changchun, Lv & Ning, Wang, 2022. "Coexistence mechanism of alien species and local ecosystem based on network dimensionality reduction method," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Gianluca Fulli & Marcelo Masera & Catalin Felix Covrig & Francesco Profumo & Ettore Bompard & Tao Huang, 2017. "The EU Electricity Security Decision-Analytic Framework: Status and Perspective Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Jean-Francois Castet & Joseph H Saleh, 2013. "Interdependent Multi-Layer Networks: Modeling and Survivability Analysis with Applications to Space-Based Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Liao, Limei & Shen, Yang & Liao, Jinbao, 2020. "Robustness of dispersal network structure to patch loss," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).
    11. Cats, O., 2016. "The robustness value of public transport development plans," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 236-246.
    12. Zhu, Qian & Zhu, Zhiliang & Wang, Yifan & Yu, Hai, 2016. "Fuzzy-information-based robustness of interconnected networks against attacks and failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 458(C), pages 194-203.
    13. Mrinal Kanti Sen & Subhrajit Dutta & Golam Kabir, 2021. "Flood Resilience of Housing Infrastructure Modeling and Quantification Using a Bayesian Belief Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Zhao, Yixin & Cai, Baoping & Kang, Henry Hooi-Siang & Liu, Yiliu, 2023. "Cascading failure analysis of multistate loading dependent systems with application in an overloading piping network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    15. Tornyeviadzi, Hoese Michel & Owusu-Ansah, Emmanuel & Mohammed, Hadi & Seidu, Razak, 2022. "A systematic framework for dynamic nodal vulnerability assessment of water distribution networks based on multilayer networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    16. Zhang, Lin & Lu, Jian & Fu, Bai-bai & Li, Shu-bin, 2019. "A cascading failures model of weighted bus transit route network under route failure perspective considering link prediction effect," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 1315-1330.
    17. Wang, Yingcong & Xiao, Renbin, 2016. "An ant colony based resilience approach to cascading failures in cluster supply network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 150-166.
    18. Sperstad, Iver Bakken & Kjølle, Gerd H. & Gjerde, Oddbjørn, 2020. "A comprehensive framework for vulnerability analysis of extraordinary events in power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Fan, Dongming & Ren, Yi & Feng, Qiang & Liu, Yiliu & Wang, Zili & Lin, Jing, 2021. "Restoration of smart grids: Current status, challenges, and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Wang, Jianwei & Jiang, Chen & Qian, Jianfei, 2014. "Robustness of interdependent networks with different link patterns against cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 535-541.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.