IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0204106.html

Whose emotion is it? Measuring self-other discrimination in romantic relationships during an emotional evaluation paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Friedrich Meixner
  • Cornelia Herbert

Abstract

In healthy subjects, emotional stimuli, positive stimuli in particular, are processed in a facilitated manner as are stimuli related to the self. These preferential processing biases also seem to hold true for self-related positive stimuli when compared to self-related negative or other-related positive stimuli suggesting a self-positivity bias in affective processing. The present study investigates the stability of this self-positivity bias and its possible extension to the emotional other in a sample of N = 147 participants including single participants (n = 61) and individuals currently in a romantic relationship (n = 86) reporting moderate to high levels of passionate love. Participants were presented a series of emotional and neutral words that could be related to the reader’s self (e.g., “my pleasure”, “my fear”), or to an insignificant third person, unknown to the reader (e.g., “his pleasure”, “his fear”) or devoid of any person reference (e.g., “the pleasure”, “the fear”). The task was to read the words silently and to evaluate the word pairs in reference to one’s own feelings elicited during reading. Results showed a self-positivity bias in emotional judgments in all participants, particularly in men. Moreover, participants in a romantic relationship (women and men) evaluated positive, other-related stimuli more often as valence-congruent with one’s own feelings than single participants. Taken together, these findings support the idea of a self-positivity bias in healthy subjects and an expansion of this bias while being in a romantic relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Friedrich Meixner & Cornelia Herbert, 2018. "Whose emotion is it? Measuring self-other discrimination in romantic relationships during an emotional evaluation paradigm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204106
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204106&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0204106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tali Sharot & Alison M. Riccardi & Candace M. Raio & Elizabeth A. Phelps, 2007. "Neural mechanisms mediating optimism bias," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7166), pages 102-105, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Amore & Orsola Garofalo & Victor Martin-Sanchez, 2022. "Dispositional optimism and business recovery during a pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Neil Garrett & Tali Sharot, 2014. "How Robust Is the Optimistic Update Bias for Estimating Self-Risk and Population Base Rates?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-8, June.
    3. Fulvio Castellacci & Henrik Schwabe, 2020. "Internet, unmet aspirations and the U-shape of life," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Weyer, Birgit, 2011. "Perspectives on optimism within the context of project management: A call for multilevel research," Working Papers 59, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute of Management Berlin (IMB).
    5. Bayer, Ralph-C. & Oberhofer, Harald & Winner, Hannes, 2015. "The occurrence of tax amnesties: Theory and evidence," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 70-82.
    6. Zai-Fu Yao & Shulan Hsieh, 2019. "Neurocognitive Mechanism of Human Resilience: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Simon Mathex & Lisette Ibanez & Raphaële Préget, 2026. "Wood heating and moral licensing: a survey study," Post-Print hal-05488755, HAL.
    8. Bayer, Ralph-C. & Oberhofer, Harald & Winner, Hannes, 2015. "The occurrence of tax amnesties: Theory and evidence," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 70-82.
    9. Mario Daniele Amore & Orsola Garofalo & Victor Martin-Sanchez, 2021. "Failing to Learn from Failure: How Optimism Impedes Entrepreneurial Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 940-964, July.
    10. JaeHong Park & Prabhudev Konana & Bin Gu & Alok Kumar & Rajagopal Raghunathan, 2013. "Information Valuation and Confirmation Bias in Virtual Communities: Evidence from Stock Message Boards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1050-1067, December.
    11. Li, Jianbiao & Liu, Zenghui & Niu, Xiaofei, 2025. "Transcranial stimulation over the right temporoparietal junction decreases outcome bias," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    12. Triebs, Thomas & Tumlinson, Justin, 2014. "Learning Capitalism The Hard Way: Evidence From Germany's Reunification," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100457, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Jetmir Zyberaj & Sebastian Seibel & Annika F. Schowalter & Lennart Pötz & Stefanie Richter-Killenberg & Judith Volmer, 2022. "Developing Sustainable Careers during a Pandemic: The Role of Psychological Capital and Career Adaptability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Kovach, Matthew, 2020. "Twisting the truth: foundations of wishful thinking," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), July.
    15. Meissner, Philip & Poensgen, Christian & Wulf, Torsten, 2021. "How hot cognition can lead us astray: The effect of anger on strategic decision making," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 434-444.
    16. Qianqian Yu & Yue-jia Luo & Ray Dolan & Jianxin Ou & Chuwen Huang & Haiteng Wang & Zhibing Xiao & Matthew Nour & Yunzhe Liu, 2025. "Trait anxiety is associated with reduced reward-related replay at rest," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Mark Harcourt & Gregor Gall & Rinu Vimal Kumar & Richard Croucher, 2021. "The role of unions in addressing behavioural market failures," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(4), pages 1165-1188, November.
    18. Schwandt, Hannes, 2016. "Unmet aspirations as an explanation for the age U-shape in wellbeing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 75-87.
    19. Schwandt, Hannes, 2013. "Unmet Aspirations as an Explanation for the Age U-shape in Human Wellbeing," IZA Discussion Papers 7604, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Emerson, David & Mulley, Corinne & Bliemer, Michiel C.J., 2016. "A theoretical analysis of business models for urban public transport systems, with comparative reference to a Community Franchise involving Individual Line Ownership," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 368-378.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.