IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0180907.html

Sex-specific enhancement of palatability-driven feeding in adolescent rats

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew T Marshall
  • Angela T Liu
  • Niall P Murphy
  • Nigel T Maidment
  • Sean B Ostlund

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that brain development during adolescence perturbs reward processing in a way that may ultimately contribute to the risky decision making associated with this stage of life, particularly in young males. To investigate potential reward dysfunction during adolescence, Experiment 1 examined palatable fluid intake in rats as a function of age and sex. During a series of twice-weekly test sessions, non-food-deprived rats were given the opportunity to voluntarily consume a highly palatable sweetened condensed milk (SCM) solution. We found that adolescent male, but not female, rats exhibited a pronounced, transient increase in SCM intake (normalized by body weight) that was centered around puberty. Additionally, adult females consumed more SCM than adult males and adolescent females. Using a well-established analytical framework to parse the influences of reward palatability and satiety on the temporal structure of feeding behavior, we found that palatability-driven intake at the outset of the meal was significantly elevated in adolescent males, relative to the other groups. Furthermore, although we found that there were some group differences in the onset of satiety, they were unlikely to contribute to differences in intake. Experiment 2 confirmed that adolescent male rats exhibit elevated palatable fluid consumption, relative to adult males, even when a non-caloric saccharin solution was used as the taste stimulus, demonstrating that these results were unlikely to be related to age-related differences in metabolic need. These findings suggest that elevated palatable food intake during adolescence is sex specific and driven by a fundamental change in reward processing. As adolescent risk taking has been hypothesized as a potential result of hypersensitivity to and overvaluation of appetitive stimuli, individual differences in reward palatability may factor into individual differences in adolescent risky decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew T Marshall & Angela T Liu & Niall P Murphy & Nigel T Maidment & Sean B Ostlund, 2017. "Sex-specific enhancement of palatability-driven feeding in adolescent rats," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0180907
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180907
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180907&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0180907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine R. Harris & Michael Jenkins & Dale Glaser, 2006. "Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 1, pages 48-63, July.
    2. Janine A. Clayton & Francis S. Collins, 2014. "Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies," Nature, Nature, vol. 509(7500), pages 282-283, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mounia Tannour-Louet & Didier F. Pisani & Hichem Bouguerra & Alycia Zedda & Marine Bourcier & Noura Lamghari & Nadine Gautier & Benoit Chaput & Elodie Riant & Anne Bouloumié & Emilie Montastier & Nath, 2026. "NCOA1 is a gatekeeper of the sexually dimorphic thermogenic activity of white adipose tissue," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Beatty, Timothy K.M. & Katare, Bhagyashree, 2018. "Low-cost approaches to increasing gym attendance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 63-76.
    3. Peter M. Wiedemann & Holger Schuetz & Franziska Boerner & Martin Clauberg & Rodney Croft & Rajesh Shukla & Toshiko Kikkawa & Ray Kemp & Jan M. Gutteling & Barney de Villiers & Flavia N. da Silva Medei, 2013. "When Precaution Creates Misunderstandings: The Unintended Effects of Precautionary Information on Perceived Risks, the EMF Case," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(10), pages 1788-1801, October.
    4. Rupi, Federico & Freo, Marzia & Poliziani, Cristian & Postorino, Maria Nadia & Schweizer, Joerg, 2023. "Analysis of gender-specific bicycle route choices using revealed preference surveys based on GPS traces," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Enrique Acosta & Alain Gagnon & Nadine Ouellette & Robert R. Bourbeau & Marília R. Nepomuceno & Alyson A. van Raalte, 2020. "The boomer penalty: excess mortality among baby boomers in Canada and the United States," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2020-003, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    6. Kimberly Coughlin & R. David Hayward & Mary Fessler & Elango Edhayan, 2018. "Changes in trauma admission rates and mechanisms during recession and recovery: evidence from the Detroit metropolitan area," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(7), pages 847-854, September.
    7. Mythily Subramaniam & Edimansyah Abdin & Alexander Man Cher Kong & Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar & Anitha Jeyagurunathan & Saleha Shafie & Rajeswari Sambasivam & Daniel Shuen Sheng Fung & Swapna Verma & Sio, 2022. "Differences in the Prevalence and Profile of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorders—Results from the Singapore Mental Health Study 2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Basu, Arnab K. & Dimova, Ralitza, 2021. "Household Preferences and Child Labor in Rural Ethiopia," IZA Discussion Papers 14062, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. Michael Cary & Heather Stephens, 2023. "Gendered Consequences of COVID-19 Among Professional Tennis Players," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 24(2), pages 241-266, February.
    10. Antonini, Marcello & Genie, Mesfin G. & Attwell, Katie & Attema, Arthur E. & Ward, Jeremy K. & Melegaro, Alessia & Torbica, Aleksandra & Kelly, Brian & Berardi, Chiara & Sequeira, Ana Rita & McGregor,, 2025. "Are we ready for the next pandemic? Public preferences and trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions across 21 countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
    11. Caferra, Rocco & Morone, Andrea & Pierno, Donato, 2024. "From Measurements to Measures: Learning Risk Preferences under Different Risk Elicitation Methods," MPRA Paper 121590, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Olga Kostopoulou & Martine Nurek & Simona Cantarella & Grace Okoli & Francesca Fiorentino & Brendan C. Delaney, 2019. "Referral Decision Making of General Practitioners: A Signal Detection Study," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(1), pages 21-31, January.
    13. Sabina Źróbek & Elżbieta Zysk & Mirosław Bełej & Natalija Lepkova, 2020. "Do Women Affect the Final Decision on the Housing Market? A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Zheng, Yanan & Goddard, Ellen W. & Qiu, Feng, "undated". "Exploring the Effect of Disease Outbreaks on Farm Structure Change: A Dynamic Analysis for Canadian Pig Industry," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273801, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Hancock, Thomas O. & Hess, Stephane & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2018. "Decision field theory: Improvements to current methodology and comparisons with standard choice modelling techniques," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 18-40.
    16. repec:plo:pone00:0099900 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Shampy Kamboj & Zillur Rahman, 2016. "The influence of user participation in social media-based brand communities on brand loyalty: age and gender as moderators," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(6), pages 679-700, November.
    18. Andrew Lewis & Raymond Duch, 2021. "Gender differences in perceived risk of COVID‐19," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2124-2133, September.
    19. Catherine Brandner, 2007. "Strategy selection during exploratory behavior: sex differences," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 2, pages 326-332, October.
    20. Jordi Duch & Xiao Han T Zeng & Marta Sales-Pardo & Filippo Radicchi & Shayna Otis & Teresa K Woodruff & Luís A Nunes Amaral, 2012. "The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-11, December.
    21. Adong, Annet & Kirui, Oliver Kiptoo & Kornher, Lukas, 2021. "Land Arrangements Between Refugees and Host Communities in Northern Uganda: Do Trust and Social Preferences Matter?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314940, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0180907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.