IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0139628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Quality Health Services and Discussion about Birth Spacing in Postpartum Contraceptive Use in Sindh, Pakistan: A Multilevel Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Tappis
  • Anis Kazi
  • Waqas Hameed
  • Zaib Dahar
  • Anayat Ali
  • Sohail Agha

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid population growth, stagnant contraceptive prevalence, and high unmet need for family planning present significant challenges for meeting Pakistan’s national and international development goals. Although health behaviors are shaped by multiple social and environmental factors, research on contraceptive uptake in Pakistan has focused on individual and household determinants, and little attention has been given to community characteristics that may affect access to services and reproductive behavior. Methods: Individual and community determinants of contraceptive use were identified using multivariable multilevel logistic regression to analyze data from a 2014 cross-sectional survey of 6,200 mothers in 503 communities in Sindh, Pakistan. Results: Only 27% of women who had given birth in the two years before the study reported using contraceptives. After adjusting for individual and community characteristics, there was no difference in the odds of contraceptive use between urban and rural women. Women who had delivered at a health facility had 1.4 times higher odds of contraceptive use than women who delivered at home. Those who received information about birth spacing from a doctor or relatives/friends had 1.81 and 1.38 times higher odds of contraceptive use, respectively, than those who did not. Living in a community where a higher proportion of women received quality antenatal care and where discussion of birth spacing was more common was significantly associated with contraceptive use. Community-wide poverty lowered contraceptive use. Conclusions: Quality of care at the community level has strong effects on contraceptive use, independent of the characteristics of individual households or women. These findings suggest that powerful gains in contraceptive use may be realized by improving the quality of antenatal care in Pakistan. Community health workers should focus on generating discussion of birth spacing in the community. Outreach efforts should target communities where the demand for contraception appears to be depressed due to high levels of poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Tappis & Anis Kazi & Waqas Hameed & Zaib Dahar & Anayat Ali & Sohail Agha, 2015. "The Role of Quality Health Services and Discussion about Birth Spacing in Postpartum Contraceptive Use in Sindh, Pakistan: A Multilevel Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0139628
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0139628
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0139628&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0139628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kofi Benefo, 1995. "The Determinants of the Duration of Postpartum Sexual Abstinence in West Africa: A Multilevel Analysis," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 32(2), pages 139-157, May.
    2. Stephenson, R. & Baschieri, A. & Clements, S. & Hennink, M. & Madise, N., 2007. "Contextual influences on modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(7), pages 1233-1240.
    3. Gbenga A Kayode & Mary Amoakoh-Coleman & Irene Akua Agyepong & Evelyn Ansah & Diederick E Grobbee & Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, 2014. "Contextual Risk Factors for Low Birth Weight: A Multilevel Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-8, October.
    4. Mumtaz, Zubia & Salway, Sarah & Nykiforuk, Candace & Bhatti, Afshan & Ataullahjan, Anushka & Ayyalasomayajula, Bharati, 2013. "The role of social geography on Lady Health Workers' mobility and effectiveness in Pakistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 48-57.
    5. Sultan, M. & Cleland, J.G. & Ali, M.M., 2002. "Assessment of a new approach to family planning services in rural Pakistan," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(7), pages 1168-1172.
    6. Bernard, Paul & Charafeddine, Rana & Frohlich, Katherine L. & Daniel, Mark & Kestens, Yan & Potvin, Louise, 2007. "Health inequalities and place: A theoretical conception of neighbourhood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(9), pages 1839-1852, November.
    7. Sue J Goldie & Steve Sweet & Natalie Carvalho & Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu & Delphine Hu, 2010. "Alternative Strategies to Reduce Maternal Mortality in India: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-1, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joseph Massenga & Rita Noronha & Bayoum Awadhi & Dunstan R. Bishanga & Oliva Safari & Lusekelo Njonge & Young-Mi Kim & Jos van Roosmalen & Thomas van den Akker, 2021. "Family Planning Uptake in Kagera and Mara Regions in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Community Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siddiqui, Shayzal & Smith-Morris, Carolyn, 2022. "Professional competition amidst intractable maternal mortality: Midwifery in rural Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    2. Spielman, Seth E. & Yoo, Eun-hye, 2009. "The spatial dimensions of neighborhood effects," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1098-1105, March.
    3. Garthwaite, Kayleigh & Bambra, Clare, 2017. "“How the other half live”: Lay perspectives on health inequalities in an age of austerity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 268-275.
    4. World Bank, 2011. "Empowering Women through BISP," World Bank Publications - Reports 27367, The World Bank Group.
    5. Masiano, Steven P. & Green, Tiffany L. & Dahman, Bassam & Kimmel, April D., 2019. "The effects of community-based distribution of family planning services on contraceptive use: The case of a national scale-up in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Katelyn Sileo & Rhoda Wanyenze & Haruna Lule & Susan Kiene, 2015. "Determinants of family planning service uptake and use of contraceptives among postpartum women in rural Uganda," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(8), pages 987-997, December.
    7. Steffen Andreas Schüle & Gabriele Bolte, 2015. "Interactive and Independent Associations between the Socioeconomic and Objective Built Environment on the Neighbourhood Level and Individual Health: A Systematic Review of Multilevel Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-31, April.
    8. Neily Zakiyah & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Frank Roijmans & Maarten J Postma, 2016. "Economic Evaluation of Family Planning Interventions in Low and Middle Income Countries; A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    9. White, Heather L. & Mulambia, Chishimba & Sinkala, Moses & Mwanahamuntu, Mulindi H. & Parham, Groesbeck P. & Moneyham, Linda & Grimley, Diane M. & Chamot, Eric, 2012. "‘Worse than HIV’ or ‘not as serious as other diseases’? Conceptualization of cervical cancer among newly screened women in Zambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1486-1493.
    10. Johannes Flacke & Steffen Andreas Schüle & Heike Köckler & Gabriele Bolte, 2016. "Mapping Environmental Inequalities Relevant for Health for Informing Urban Planning Interventions—A Case Study in the City of Dortmund, Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Esther O Lamidi, 2015. "State Variations in Women’s Socioeconomic Status and Use of Modern Contraceptives in Nigeria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Roxana Rodríguez-Franco & Edson Serván-Mori & Octavio Gómez-Dantés & David Contreras-Loya & Carlos Pineda-Antúnez, 2018. "Old principles, persisting challenges: Maternal health care market alignment in Mexico in the search for UHC," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Tamar Goldenberg & Rob Stephenson, 2019. "Applying a deviance framework to understand modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Koschinsky, Julia, 2013. "The case for spatial analysis in evaluation to reduce health inequities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 172-176.
    15. Camille Le Gal & Michael J. Dale & Margaret Cargo & Mark Daniel, 2020. "Built Environments and Cardiometabolic Morbidity and Mortality in Remote Indigenous Communities in the Northern Territory, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-9, January.
    16. Billings, Katie R. & Cort, David A. & Rozario, Tannuja D. & Siegel, Derek P., 2021. "HIV stigma beliefs in context: Country and regional variation in the effects of instrumental stigma beliefs on protective sexual behaviors in Latin America, the Caribbean, and Southern Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Kabeya Clement Mulamba, 2023. "The role of male partners in modern contraceptive use by women in South Africa: Does space also matter?," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Sylvain Dessy & Setou Diarra & Roland Pongou, 2017. "Underage Brides and Grooms’ Education," Working Papers 1704E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    19. Grant Miller & Aureo de Paula & Christine Valente, 2020. "Subjective Expectations and Demand for Contraception," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 20/724, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    20. Nádia Simões & Nuno Crespo & Sandrina B. Moreira & Celeste A. Varum, 2016. "Measurement and determinants of health poverty and richness: evidence from Portugal," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1331-1358, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0139628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.