IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1001730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective Coverage: A Metric for Monitoring Universal Health Coverage

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Ng
  • Nancy Fullman
  • Joseph L Dieleman
  • Abraham D Flaxman
  • Christopher J L Murray
  • Stephen S Lim

Abstract

: As part of the PLOS Collection on Universal Health Coverage, Stephen Lim and colleagues review the concept of effective coverage and discuss the ways in which current health information systems can support generating estimates of effective coverage. A major challenge in monitoring universal health coverage (UHC) is identifying an indicator that can adequately capture the multiple components underlying the UHC initiative. Effective coverage, which unites individual and intervention characteristics into a single metric, offers a direct and flexible means to measure health system performance at different levels. We view effective coverage as a relevant and actionable metric for tracking progress towards achieving UHC. In this paper, we review the concept of effective coverage and delineate the three components of the metric — need, use, and quality — using several examples. Further, we explain how the metric can be used for monitoring interventions at both local and global levels. We also discuss the ways that current health information systems can support generating estimates of effective coverage. We conclude by recognizing some of the challenges associated with producing estimates of effective coverage. Despite these challenges, effective coverage is a powerful metric that can provide a more nuanced understanding of whether, and how well, a health system is delivering services to its populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Ng & Nancy Fullman & Joseph L Dieleman & Abraham D Flaxman & Christopher J L Murray & Stephen S Lim, 2014. "Effective Coverage: A Metric for Monitoring Universal Health Coverage," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-9, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001730
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001730
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001730&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.