IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0002341.html

The role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in the COVID-19 response across the Global South: A multinational, qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Adam C Levine
  • Anna Park
  • Anindita Adhikari
  • Maria Carinnes P Alejandria
  • Benjamin H Bradlow
  • Maria F Lopez-Portillo
  • Salma Mutwafy
  • Ieva Zumbyte
  • Patrick Heller

Abstract

Despite receiving less attention than high-income countries, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experienced more than 85% of global excess deaths during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the unprecedented speed and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, which placed large demands on government capacity, many LMICs relied on civil society organizations (CSOs) to assist in implementing COVID-19 response programs. Yet few studies have examined the critical role CSOs played in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in low resource settings. This study explored the CSO response to COVID-19 in five of the most heavily impacted LMICs in the Global South. Interviews were conducted from May to August 2021 with a purposive sample of CSO key informants within each of the five countries. A total of 52 CSOs were selected from which 53 key informants were interviewed either via Zoom or by phone. Interviews were coded and analyzed using NVivo or MAXQDA2020. Out of the 52 CSOs selected, 24 were national organizations, 8 were regional, and 20 were local. CSOs fell into six categories: community-based organizations, non-governmental organizations, unions/professional organizations, campaigns/social movements, research organizations/think tanks, and networks/coalitions. CSOs across all five countries adapted their missions, stretched their resources, and performed a wide range of activities that fit into five programmatic areas: food security and livelihood support, public health and medical care, cash transfer programs, risk communication and community education, and needs assessment. This qualitative analysis demonstrates the critical role CSOs played in supplementing government emergency aid response by delivering necessary resources and supporting highly vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the primary challenges they faced in doing so. Given the generally weak state of public capacity in the LMICs studied, this role was vital to responding to the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam C Levine & Anna Park & Anindita Adhikari & Maria Carinnes P Alejandria & Benjamin H Bradlow & Maria F Lopez-Portillo & Salma Mutwafy & Ieva Zumbyte & Patrick Heller, 2023. "The role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in the COVID-19 response across the Global South: A multinational, qualitative study," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(9), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002341
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002341
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0002341&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Denila Villanueva & Jonathan D. Austria & Kendrick Mico Faronilo & Aywin Rosette Sunga-Lim & Enrico L. Replan & Janice B. Sevilla-Nastor & Renante Abuyan & Nicolas Peyraube, 2022. "Effect of Lockdown on Food Security during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Philippines : Two Months after Implementation," Post-Print hal-03775378, HAL.
    2. Doyle, Cathal & Patel, Preeti, 2008. "Civil society organisations and global health initiatives: Problems of legitimacy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1928-1938, May.
    3. Yuxun Zhou & Mohammad Mafizur Rahman & Rasheda Khanam, 2022. "The impact of the government response on pandemic control in the long run—A dynamic empirical analysis based on COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Evans, Peter, 1996. "Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1119-1132, June.
    5. World Bank, 2005. "World Development Report 2006," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 5988, April.
    6. Miao, Qing & Schwarz, Susan & Schwarz, Gary, 2021. "Responding to COVID-19: Community volunteerism and coproduction in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levien, Michael, 2015. "Social Capital as Obstacle to Development: Brokering Land, Norms, and Trust in Rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-92.
    2. Diana Trujillo, 2018. "Multiparty Alliances and Systemic Change: The Role of Beneficiaries and Their Capacity for Collective Action," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 425-449, June.
    3. Kraay, Aart C. & Lakner, Christoph & Ozler, Berk & Decerf, Benoit Marie A & Jolliffe, Dean Mitchell & Sterck,Olivier & Yonzan, Nishant, 2023. "A New Distribution Sensitive Index for Measuring Welfare, Poverty, and Inequality," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10470, The World Bank.
    4. K.N. Nair, 2008. "Livelihood Risks and Coping Strategies: A Case Study in the Agrarian Village Of Cherumad, Kerala," Working Papers id:1376, eSocialSciences.
    5. Caroline Patsias & Anne Latendresse & Laurence Bherer, 2013. "Participatory Democracy, Decentralization and Local Governance: the Montreal Participatory Budget in the light of ‘Empowered Participatory Governance’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2214-2230, November.
    6. Tamilina, Larysa, 2012. "Characteristics of social policies and social trust," MPRA Paper 96517, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Wouter Groot & Haranath Tadepally, 2008. "Community action for environmental restoration: a case study on collective social capital in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 519-536, August.
    8. Matthias Busse & Ruth Hoekstra & Robert Darko Osei, 2017. "The Effectiveness of aid in Improving Regulations: An Empirical Assessment," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 85(3), pages 368-385, September.
    9. A. Arrighetti & G. Seravalli & G. Wolleb, 2001. "Social Capital, Institutions and Collective Action Between Firms," Economics Department Working Papers 2001-EP08, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    10. Marcus Wiens & Miriam Klein & Frank Schultmann, 2022. "Border Region Attachment: An Empirical Study on Regional Social Capital in the French–German Border Area [Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate Change]," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 68(4), pages 362-390.
    11. Javier Herrera & Mireille Razafindrakoto & François Roubaud, 2007. "Governance, Democracy and Poverty Reduction: Lessons Drawn from Household Surveys in Sub‐Saharan Africa and Latin America," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 75(1), pages 70-95, April.
    12. Seunghwan Myeong & Hyungjun Seo, 2016. "Which Type of Social Capital Matters for Building Trust in Government? Looking for a New Type of Social Capital in the Governance Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, March.
    13. E.M. Ekanayake & Mihalis Halkides & Robin Rance & Iliana Filyanova, 2007. "Intra-Industry Trade Between The United States And Latin American Countries," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 1(2), pages 109-124.
    14. Cruz-Martinez, Gibran, 2018. "A Bottom-up picture of Intra-National Welfare Regimes: The case of Marginalised Communities in Puerto Rico," SocArXiv 8c2ex, Center for Open Science.
    15. Jēkabsone Inga & Sloka Biruta, 2016. "Social Capital, Well-Being and Municipality: Salaspils Municipality (Latvia) Case," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 65-75, June.
    16. Bouquet, Emmanuelle, 2009. "State-Led Land Reform and Local Institutional Change: Land Titles, Land Markets and Tenure Security in Mexican Communities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1390-1399, August.
    17. Paul S. Adler, 2001. "Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 215-234, April.
    18. Maarten Crivits & Charlotte Prové & Thomas Block & Joost Dessein, 2016. "Four Perspectives of Sustainability Applied to the Local Food Strategy of Ghent (Belgium): Need for a Cycle of Democratic Participation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Mayka, Lindsay & Abbott, Jared, 2023. "Varieties of participatory institutions and interest intermediation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    20. Friel, Sharon & Townsend, Belinda & Fisher, Matthew & Harris, Patrick & Freeman, Toby & Baum, Fran, 2021. "Power and the people's health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.