IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1012696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the distribution of parameters in differential equations with repeated cross-sectional data

Author

Listed:
  • Hyeontae Jo
  • Sung Woong Cho
  • Hyung Ju Hwang

Abstract

Differential equations are pivotal in modeling and understanding the dynamics of various systems, as they offer insights into their future states through parameter estimation fitted to time series data. In fields such as economy, politics, and biology, the observation data points in the time series are often independently obtained (i.e., Repeated Cross-Sectional (RCS) data). RCS data showed that traditional methods for parameter estimation in differential equations, such as using mean values of RCS data over time, Gaussian Process-based trajectory generation, and Bayesian-based methods, have limitations in estimating the shape of parameter distributions, leading to a significant loss of data information. To address this issue, this study proposes a novel method called Estimation of Parameter Distribution (EPD) that provides accurate distribution of parameters without loss of data information. EPD operates in three main steps: generating synthetic time trajectories by randomly selecting observed values at each time point, estimating parameters of a differential equation that minimizes the discrepancy between these trajectories and the true solution of the equation, and selecting the parameters depending on the scale of discrepancy. We then evaluated the performance of EPD across several models, including exponential growth, logistic population models, and target cell-limited models with delayed virus production, thereby demonstrating the ability of the proposed method in capturing the shape of parameter distributions. Furthermore, we applied EPD to real-world datasets, capturing various shapes of parameter distributions over a normal distribution. These results address the heterogeneity within systems, marking a substantial progression in accurately modeling systems using RCS data. Therefore, EPD marks a significant advancement in accurately modeling systems with RCS data, realizing a deeper understanding of system dynamics and parameter variability.Author summary: Observation data points in biological experiments are often obtained from independent objects over time (i.e., Repeated Cross-Sectional (RCS) data). One method to obtain biological information from RCS data is to design a mathematical model and determine the range of parameters in the model that fits the data correctly. Here, the shape of parameter distributions provides data information, such as heterogeneity in biological phenomena. However, we found that classical estimation methods fail to determine the correct shape of parameter distributions, leading to a significant loss of data information. To address this, we propose a novel method, Estimating Parameter Distribution (EPD), to catch the accurate shape of parameter distributions originating from RCS data. Specifically, EPD involves three steps: First, we generated several artificial time series data from the RCS data. Second, we evaluated the suitability of these artificial data by fitting them to the mathematical model. Finally, we determined the best artificial data that matched the RCS data. The results showed that EPD provided more accurate estimations of distributions for the growth rate of Amyloid beta peptides and the half-saturation constant of the viral population compared to previous research results. Specifically, EPD revealed correct parameter distribution with heterogeneity in parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyeontae Jo & Sung Woong Cho & Hyung Ju Hwang, 2024. "Estimating the distribution of parameters in differential equations with repeated cross-sectional data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012696
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012696
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012696&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clarke, Harold D. & Stewart, Marianne C. & Ault, Mike & Elliott, Euel, 2005. "Men, Women and the Dynamics of Presidential Approval," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 31-51, January.
    2. Beck, Nathaniel & Katz, Jonathan N., 2007. "Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 182-195, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Marie Knott, 2016. "Outsourced R&D and GDP Growth," Working Papers 16-19, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    2. Alexandra Gheondea-Eladi, 2016. "The Evolution of Certainty in a Small Decision-Making Group by Consensus," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 127-155, January.
    3. Tsai, Tsung-Han, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Dynamic Panel Models with Endogenous Rarely Changing Variables," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 595-620, September.
    4. Parker, Karen F. & Stansfield, Richard & McCall, Patricia L., 2016. "Temporal changes in racial violence, 1980 to 2006: A latent trajectory approach," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Brown, Richard S., 2016. "Lobbying, political connectedness and financial performance in the air transportation industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 61-69.
    6. Uta Brehm & Henriette Engelhardt, 2015. "On the age-specific correlation between fertility and female employment," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(23), pages 691-722.
    7. Josip Glaurdić & Vuk Vuković, 2017. "Granting votes: exposing the political bias of intergovernmental grants using the within-between specification for panel data," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 223-241, April.
    8. Boris Branisa & Adriana Cardozo, 2009. "Revisiting the Regional Growth Convergence Debate in Colombia Using Income Indicators," Ibero America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Papers 194, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research, revised 21 Aug 2009.
    9. Andrew Bell & Malcolm Fairbrother & Kelvyn Jones, 2019. "Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 1051-1074, March.
    10. Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati, 2012. "Impact of Political Risk on FDI Revisited—An Aggregate Firm-Level Analysis," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 111-139, January.
    11. Abonazel, Mohamed R., 2016. "Generalized Random Coefficient Estimators of Panel Data Models: Asymptotic and Small Sample Properties," MPRA Paper 72586, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Tibor András Marton & Anna Kis & Anna Zubor-Nemes & Anikó Kern & Nándor Fodor, 2020. "Human Impact Promotes Sustainable Corn Production in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Lance Y. Hunter & Joseph W. Robbins & Martha H. Ginn & Aaron Hutton, 2019. "Meet in the Middle: Terrorism and Centrist Party Vote Shares in Legislative Elections," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(1), pages 60-74, February.
    14. Fawaz Fadi & Moghadam Mashaallah Rahnama, 2013. "Spatial Dependence of Technology Spillovers among Trading Partners," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 47-62, January.
    15. José Javier Bercoff & Osvaldo Meloni, 2023. "Looking inside the ballot box: gender gaps in Argentine presidential elections," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 70(2), pages 237-255, June.
    16. Wilfredo Toledo, 2020. "Self-Employment: Entrepreneurship Or Refuge From Unemployment? El Empleo Autonomo: ¿Emprendedurismo O Refugio Del Desempleo?," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13.
    17. Erik Bengtsson, 2014. "Do unions redistribute income from capital to labour? Union density and wage shares since 1960," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 389-408, September.
    18. Thomas Buser & Louis Putterman & Joël van der Weele, 2016. "Gender and Redistribution: Experimental Evidence," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-063/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Buser, Thomas & Grimalda, Gianluca & Putterman, Louis & van der Weele, Joël, 2020. "Overconfidence and gender gaps in redistributive preferences: Cross-Country experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 267-286.
    20. Ji Won Jung & Jinhwan Oh, 2020. "Determinants of presidential approval ratings: Cross-country analyses with reference to Latin America," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 23(3), pages 251-267, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.