IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Computation Emerges in Generic Cortical Microcircuits through Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhard Nessler
  • Michael Pfeiffer
  • Lars Buesing
  • Wolfgang Maass

Abstract

The principles by which networks of neurons compute, and how spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) of synaptic weights generates and maintains their computational function, are unknown. Preceding work has shown that soft winner-take-all (WTA) circuits, where pyramidal neurons inhibit each other via interneurons, are a common motif of cortical microcircuits. We show through theoretical analysis and computer simulations that Bayesian computation is induced in these network motifs through STDP in combination with activity-dependent changes in the excitability of neurons. The fundamental components of this emergent Bayesian computation are priors that result from adaptation of neuronal excitability and implicit generative models for hidden causes that are created in the synaptic weights through STDP. In fact, a surprising result is that STDP is able to approximate a powerful principle for fitting such implicit generative models to high-dimensional spike inputs: Expectation Maximization. Our results suggest that the experimentally observed spontaneous activity and trial-to-trial variability of cortical neurons are essential features of their information processing capability, since their functional role is to represent probability distributions rather than static neural codes. Furthermore it suggests networks of Bayesian computation modules as a new model for distributed information processing in the cortex. Author Summary: How do neurons learn to extract information from their inputs, and perform meaningful computations? Neurons receive inputs as continuous streams of action potentials or “spikes” that arrive at thousands of synapses. The strength of these synapses - the synaptic weight - undergoes constant modification. It has been demonstrated in numerous experiments that this modification depends on the temporal order of spikes in the pre- and postsynaptic neuron, a rule known as STDP, but it has remained unclear, how this contributes to higher level functions in neural network architectures. In this paper we show that STDP induces in a commonly found connectivity motif in the cortex - a winner-take-all (WTA) network - autonomous, self-organized learning of probabilistic models of the input. The resulting function of the neural circuit is Bayesian computation on the input spike trains. Such unsupervised learning has previously been studied extensively on an abstract, algorithmical level. We show that STDP approximates one of the most powerful learning methods in machine learning, Expectation-Maximization (EM). In a series of computer simulations we demonstrate that this enables STDP in WTA circuits to solve complex learning tasks, reaching a performance level that surpasses previous uses of spiking neural networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhard Nessler & Michael Pfeiffer & Lars Buesing & Wolfgang Maass, 2013. "Bayesian Computation Emerges in Generic Cortical Microcircuits through Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003037
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003037
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003037&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina Savin & Prashant Joshi & Jochen Triesch, 2010. "Independent Component Analysis in Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Christian Keck & Cristina Savin & Jörg Lücke, 2012. "Feedforward Inhibition and Synaptic Scaling – Two Sides of the Same Coin?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Richard H. R. Hahnloser & Rahul Sarpeshkar & Misha A. Mahowald & Rodney J. Douglas & H. Sebastian Seung, 2000. "Correction: Digital selection and analogue amplification coexist in a cortex-inspired silicon circuit," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6815), pages 1012-1012, December.
    4. Dejan Pecevski & Lars Buesing & Wolfgang Maass, 2011. "Probabilistic Inference in General Graphical Models through Sampling in Stochastic Networks of Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Lars Buesing & Johannes Bill & Bernhard Nessler & Wolfgang Maass, 2011. "Neural Dynamics as Sampling: A Model for Stochastic Computation in Recurrent Networks of Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Robert C. Froemke & Yang Dan, 2002. "Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6879), pages 433-438, March.
    7. Richard H. R. Hahnloser & Rahul Sarpeshkar & Misha A. Mahowald & Rodney J. Douglas & H. Sebastian Seung, 2000. "Digital selection and analogue amplification coexist in a cortex-inspired silicon circuit," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6789), pages 947-951, June.
    8. Konrad P. Körding & Daniel M. Wolpert, 2004. "Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 427(6971), pages 244-247, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthieu Gilson & David Dahmen & Rubén Moreno-Bote & Andrea Insabato & Moritz Helias, 2020. "The covariance perceptron: A new paradigm for classification and processing of time series in recurrent neuronal networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-38, October.
    2. David Kappel & Bernhard Nessler & Wolfgang Maass, 2014. "STDP Installs in Winner-Take-All Circuits an Online Approximation to Hidden Markov Model Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Mingi Jeon & Taewook Kang & Jae-Jin Lee & Woojoo Lee, 2022. "A Study on the Low-Power Operation of the Spike Neural Network Using the Sensory Adaptation Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Lieder, Falk & Griffiths, Tom & Hsu, Ming, 2016. "Over-representation of extreme events in decision-making reflects rational use of cognitive resources," OSF Preprints kxxag, Center for Open Science.
    5. Robert Legenstein & Wolfgang Maass, 2014. "Ensembles of Spiking Neurons with Noise Support Optimal Probabilistic Inference in a Dynamically Changing Environment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Martinez-Saito, Mario, 2022. "Discrete scaling and criticality in a chain of adaptive excitable integrators," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed A Metwally & Philip S Yu & Derek Reiman & Yang Dai & Patricia W Finn & David L Perkins, 2019. "Utilizing longitudinal microbiome taxonomic profiles to predict food allergy via Long Short-Term Memory networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Wen-Hao Zhang & Si Wu & Krešimir Josić & Brent Doiron, 2023. "Sampling-based Bayesian inference in recurrent circuits of stochastic spiking neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Kim, Seongsu & Kim, Junghwan, 2023. "Assessing fuel economy and NOx emissions of a hydrogen engine bus using neural network algorithms for urban mass transit systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    4. Zhang, Wen & Yan, Shaoshan & Li, Jian & Tian, Xin & Yoshida, Taketoshi, 2022. "Credit risk prediction of SMEs in supply chain finance by fusing demographic and behavioral data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Maoz Shamir, 2009. "The Temporal Winner-Take-All Readout," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Oostwal, Elisa & Straat, Michiel & Biehl, Michael, 2021. "Hidden unit specialization in layered neural networks: ReLU vs. sigmoidal activation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 564(C).
    7. Phattara Khumprom & Nita Yodo, 2019. "A Data-Driven Predictive Prognostic Model for Lithium-ion Batteries based on a Deep Learning Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Joanne C Wen & Cecilia S Lee & Pearse A Keane & Sa Xiao & Ariel S Rokem & Philip P Chen & Yue Wu & Aaron Y Lee, 2019. "Forecasting future Humphrey Visual Fields using deep learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Kei Nakagawa & Masaya Abe & Junpei Komiyama, 2019. "A Robust Transferable Deep Learning Framework for Cross-sectional Investment Strategy," Papers 1910.01491, arXiv.org.
    10. Jingfen Lan & Ziheng Liao & A. K. Alvi Haque & Qiang Yu & Kun Xie & Yang Guo, 2024. "CNVbd: A Method for Copy Number Variation Detection and Boundary Search," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Robert Legenstein & Wolfgang Maass, 2014. "Ensembles of Spiking Neurons with Noise Support Optimal Probabilistic Inference in a Dynamically Changing Environment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Richter, Lucas & Lehna, Malte & Marchand, Sophie & Scholz, Christoph & Dreher, Alexander & Klaiber, Stefan & Lenk, Steve, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence for Electricity Supply Chain automation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Baiti-Ahmad Awaluddin & Chun-Tang Chao & Juing-Shian Chiou, 2023. "Investigating Effective Geometric Transformation for Image Augmentation to Improve Static Hand Gestures with a Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, November.
    14. González-Muñiz, Ana & Díaz, Ignacio & Cuadrado, Abel A. & García-Pérez, Diego, 2022. "Health indicator for machine condition monitoring built in the latent space of a deep autoencoder," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    15. Hancock, Thomas O. & Broekaert, Jan & Hess, Stephane & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2020. "Quantum probability: A new method for modelling travel behaviour," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 165-198.
    16. Stefan Habenschuss & Zeno Jonke & Wolfgang Maass, 2013. "Stochastic Computations in Cortical Microcircuit Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, November.
    17. Jingwei Sun & Jian Li & Hang Zhang, 2019. "Human representation of multimodal distributions as clusters of samples," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-29, May.
    18. Jörg Bornschein & Marc Henniges & Jörg Lücke, 2013. "Are V1 Simple Cells Optimized for Visual Occlusions? A Comparative Study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Artem Kuriksha, 2021. "An Economy of Neural Networks: Learning from Heterogeneous Experiences," Papers 2110.11582, arXiv.org.
    20. Bodendorf, Frank & Xie, Qiao & Merkl, Philipp & Franke, Jörg, 2022. "A multi-perspective approach to support collaborative cost management in supplier-buyer dyads," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.