IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ensembles of Spiking Neurons with Noise Support Optimal Probabilistic Inference in a Dynamically Changing Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Legenstein
  • Wolfgang Maass

Abstract

It has recently been shown that networks of spiking neurons with noise can emulate simple forms of probabilistic inference through “neural sampling”, i.e., by treating spikes as samples from a probability distribution of network states that is encoded in the network. Deficiencies of the existing model are its reliance on single neurons for sampling from each random variable, and the resulting limitation in representing quickly varying probabilistic information. We show that both deficiencies can be overcome by moving to a biologically more realistic encoding of each salient random variable through the stochastic firing activity of an ensemble of neurons. The resulting model demonstrates that networks of spiking neurons with noise can easily track and carry out basic computational operations on rapidly varying probability distributions, such as the odds of getting rewarded for a specific behavior. We demonstrate the viability of this new approach towards neural coding and computation, which makes use of the inherent parallelism of generic neural circuits, by showing that this model can explain experimentally observed firing activity of cortical neurons for a variety of tasks that require rapid temporal integration of sensory information.Author Summary: The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach to probabilistic inference for a distribution is to draw a sequence of samples from and to carry out computational operations via simple online computations on such a sequence. But such a sequential computational process takes time, and therefore this simple version of the MCMC approach runs into problems when one needs to carry out probabilistic inference for rapidly varying distributions. This difficulty also affects all currently existing models for emulating MCMC sampling by networks of stochastically firing neurons. We show here that by moving to a space-rate approach where salient probabilities are encoded through the spiking activity of ensembles of neurons, rather than by single neurons, this problem can be solved. In this way even theoretically optimal models for dealing with time varying distributions through sequential Monte Carlo sampling, so called particle filters, can be emulated by networks of spiking neurons. Each spike of a neuron in an ensemble represents in this approach a “particle” (or vote) for a particular value of a time-varying random variable. In other words, neural circuits can speed up computations based on Monte Carlo sampling through their inherent parallelism.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Legenstein & Wolfgang Maass, 2014. "Ensembles of Spiking Neurons with Noise Support Optimal Probabilistic Inference in a Dynamically Changing Environment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003859
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003859
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003859&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tianming Yang & Michael N. Shadlen, 2007. "Probabilistic reasoning by neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7148), pages 1075-1080, June.
    2. David Kappel & Bernhard Nessler & Wolfgang Maass, 2014. "STDP Installs in Winner-Take-All Circuits an Online Approximation to Hidden Markov Model Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Bernhard Nessler & Michael Pfeiffer & Lars Buesing & Wolfgang Maass, 2013. "Bayesian Computation Emerges in Generic Cortical Microcircuits through Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Johannes J. Letzkus & Steffen B. E. Wolff & Elisabeth M. M. Meyer & Philip Tovote & Julien Courtin & Cyril Herry & Andreas Lüthi, 2011. "A disinhibitory microcircuit for associative fear learning in the auditory cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 480(7377), pages 331-335, December.
    5. Dejan Pecevski & Lars Buesing & Wolfgang Maass, 2011. "Probabilistic Inference in General Graphical Models through Sampling in Stochastic Networks of Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Lars Buesing & Johannes Bill & Bernhard Nessler & Wolfgang Maass, 2011. "Neural Dynamics as Sampling: A Model for Stochastic Computation in Recurrent Networks of Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Hyun-Jae Pi & Balázs Hangya & Duda Kvitsiani & Joshua I. Sanders & Z. Josh Huang & Adam Kepecs, 2013. "Cortical interneurons that specialize in disinhibitory control," Nature, Nature, vol. 503(7477), pages 521-524, November.
    8. Mattia Rigotti & Omri Barak & Melissa R. Warden & Xiao-Jing Wang & Nathaniel D. Daw & Earl K. Miller & Stefano Fusi, 2013. "The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks," Nature, Nature, vol. 497(7451), pages 585-590, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florent Meyniel & Daniel Schlunegger & Stanislas Dehaene, 2015. "The Sense of Confidence during Probabilistic Learning: A Normative Account," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Sebastian Bitzer & Jelle Bruineberg & Stefan J Kiebel, 2015. "A Bayesian Attractor Model for Perceptual Decision Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-35, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhewei Zhang & Chaoqun Yin & Tianming Yang, 2022. "Evidence accumulation occurs locally in the parietal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Lieder, Falk & Griffiths, Tom & Hsu, Ming, 2016. "Over-representation of extreme events in decision-making reflects rational use of cognitive resources," OSF Preprints kxxag, Center for Open Science.
    3. David Kappel & Bernhard Nessler & Wolfgang Maass, 2014. "STDP Installs in Winner-Take-All Circuits an Online Approximation to Hidden Markov Model Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Bernhard Nessler & Michael Pfeiffer & Lars Buesing & Wolfgang Maass, 2013. "Bayesian Computation Emerges in Generic Cortical Microcircuits through Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-30, April.
    5. Shinichiro Kira & Houman Safaai & Ari S. Morcos & Stefano Panzeri & Christopher D. Harvey, 2023. "A distributed and efficient population code of mixed selectivity neurons for flexible navigation decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    6. Stefan Habenschuss & Zeno Jonke & Wolfgang Maass, 2013. "Stochastic Computations in Cortical Microcircuit Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, November.
    7. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Wen-Hao Zhang & Si Wu & Krešimir Josić & Brent Doiron, 2023. "Sampling-based Bayesian inference in recurrent circuits of stochastic spiking neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Yang Qi & Pulin Gong, 2022. "Fractional neural sampling as a theory of spatiotemporal probabilistic computations in neural circuits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Nicolas Cazin & Martin Llofriu Alonso & Pablo Scleidorovich Chiodi & Tatiana Pelc & Bruce Harland & Alfredo Weitzenfeld & Jean-Marc Fellous & Peter Ford Dominey, 2019. "Reservoir computing model of prefrontal cortex creates novel combinations of previous navigation sequences from hippocampal place-cell replay with spatial reward propagation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-32, July.
    11. Marine Hainguerlot & Thibault Gajdos & Jean-Christophe Vergnaud & Vincent de Gardelle, 2023. "How Overconfidence Bias Influences Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-04197403, HAL.
    12. Jan Weber & Anne-Kristin Solbakk & Alejandro O. Blenkmann & Anais Llorens & Ingrid Funderud & Sabine Leske & Pål Gunnar Larsson & Jugoslav Ivanovic & Robert T. Knight & Tor Endestad & Randolph F. Helf, 2024. "Ramping dynamics and theta oscillations reflect dissociable signatures during rule-guided human behavior," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Pierre O. Boucher & Tian Wang & Laura Carceroni & Gary Kane & Krishna V. Shenoy & Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, 2023. "Initial conditions combine with sensory evidence to induce decision-related dynamics in premotor cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    14. Athina Tzovara & Christoph W Korn & Dominik R Bach, 2018. "Human Pavlovian fear conditioning conforms to probabilistic learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Masakazu Agetsuma & Issei Sato & Yasuhiro R. Tanaka & Luis Carrillo-Reid & Atsushi Kasai & Atsushi Noritake & Yoshiyuki Arai & Miki Yoshitomo & Takashi Inagaki & Hiroshi Yukawa & Hitoshi Hashimoto & J, 2023. "Activity-dependent organization of prefrontal hub-networks for associative learning and signal transformation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Wenyi Zhang & Yang Xie & Tianming Yang, 2022. "Reward salience but not spatial attention dominates the value representation in the orbitofrontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Hagai Lalazar & L F Abbott & Eilon Vaadia, 2016. "Tuning Curves for Arm Posture Control in Motor Cortex Are Consistent with Random Connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    18. Dickhaut, John & Smith, Vernon & Xin, Baohua & Rustichini, Aldo, 2013. "Human economic choice as costly information processing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 206-221.
    19. Javier G. Orlandi & Mohammad Abdolrahmani & Ryo Aoki & Dmitry R. Lyamzin & Andrea Benucci, 2023. "Distributed context-dependent choice information in mouse posterior cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Jason S Prentice & Olivier Marre & Mark L Ioffe & Adrianna R Loback & Gašper Tkačik & Michael J Berry II, 2016. "Error-Robust Modes of the Retinal Population Code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.