IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v37y1998i4p1031-1050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimates of Farm Output Supply and Input Demand Elasticities: The Translog Profit Function Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ali Chaudhary

    (Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.)

  • Mushtaq Ahmad Khan

    (Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.)

  • Kaukab Hassan Naqvi

    (Planning Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.)

Abstract

The importance of estimating valid elasticities of farm output supply and input demand can hardly be overemphasised. Reliable estimates of these elasticities are sine qua non for predicting accurately the farmer responsiveness to changes in inputoutput prices and government taxes and thereby for formulating successful agricultural incentive programmes consistent with national requirements of food, development and exports. In fact, robust estimates of the coefficients of such elasticities can serve as a solid basis in determining effective policy relevant interventions for promoting production, equity, efficiency, and finally egalitarian income distribution in the farm sector of the economy. Farmer input factor demand and output supply elasticities have earlier been derived with direct or indirect application of the Cobb-Douglas production function to farm survey data [Lau and Yotopoulos (1971); Yotopoulos (1972); Yotopoulos, Lau and Lin (1976); Junankar (1980) and Sindhu and Baanannte (1981)]. The Cobb- Douglas production function is based on highly restricted assumptions such as the unitary elasticity of substitution, constant returns to scale and "a priori" imposition of separability restrictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ali Chaudhary & Mushtaq Ahmad Khan & Kaukab Hassan Naqvi, 1998. "Estimates of Farm Output Supply and Input Demand Elasticities: The Translog Profit Function Approach," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 37(4), pages 1031-1050.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:37:y:1998:i:4:p:1031-1050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1998/Volume4/1031-1050.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McFadden, Daniel, 1978. "Cost, Revenue, and Profit Functions," Histoy of Economic Thought Chapters, in: Fuss, Melvyn & McFadden, Daniel (ed.),Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, volume 1, chapter 1, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought.
    2. Trosper, Ronald L, 1978. "American Indian Relative Ranching Efficiency," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 68(4), pages 503-516, September.
    3. BARTEN, Anton P., 1969. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a complete system of demand equations," LIDAM Reprints CORE 34, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Barten, A. P., 1969. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a complete system of demand equations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 7-73.
    5. Lau, Lawrence J & Yotopoulos, Pan A, 1971. "A Test for Relative Efficiency and Application to Indian Agriculture," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 94-109, March.
    6. McKay, Lloyd & Lawrence, Denis & Vlastuin, Chris, 1983. "Profit, Output Supply, and Input Demand Functions for Multiproduct Firms: The Case of Australian Agriculture," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 24(2), pages 323-339, June.
    7. Diewert, W E, 1971. "An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(3), pages 481-507, May-June.
    8. Lau, Lawrence J., 1969. "Duality and the structure of utility functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 374-396, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chatura Sewwandi Wijetunga, 2016. "Rice production structures in Sri Lanka: The normalized translog profit function approach," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(2), pages 21-35, February.
    2. Kaimba, George K. & Mithöfer, Dagmar & Muendo, Kavoi M., 2021. "Commercialization of underutilized fruits: Baobab pulp supply response to price and non-price incentives in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. John Njenga Macharia & Gracious Malton Diiro & John Rono Busienei & Kimpei Munei & Hippolyte D. Affognon & Sunday Ekesi & Beatrice Muriithi & Dorothy Nakimbugwe & Chrysantus Mbi Tanga & Komi K. M. Fia, 2020. "Gendered analysis of the demand for poultry feed in Kenya," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(4), pages 426-439, October.
    4. Luca Tiberti & Marco Tiberti, 2015. "Rural Policies, Price Change and Poverty in Tanzania: An Agricultural Household Model-Based Assessment," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 24(2), pages 193-229.
    5. Wijetunga, Chatura Sewwandi, 2023. "Rice Production Structures in Sri Lanka: The Normalized Translog Profit Function Approach," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 6(02), January.
    6. Mbugua, Mercy Wanjiru & Irungu, Patrick & Nzuma, Jonathan, 2014. "Analysis Of Demand For Antibiotics In Poultry Production In Kiambu County, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 269532, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.
    2. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "The Differential Approach to Demand Analysis and the Rotterdam Model," MPRA Paper 12319, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Holt, Matthew T., 2002. "Inverse demand systems and choice of functional form," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 117-142, January.
    4. Marc-Andreas Muendler & Sascha O. Becker, 2010. "Margins of Multinational Labor Substitution," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(5), pages 1999-2030, December.
    5. Apostolos Serletis & Libo Xu, 2020. "Demand systems with heteroscedastic disturbances," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1913-1921, April.
    6. Sohail Zafar & Eatzaz Ahmed, 2005. "Evidence on Allocative Efficiency and Elasticities of Substitution in the Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 44(4), pages 795-803.
    7. William A. Barnett & Isaac Kalonda Kanyama, 2013. "Time-varying parameters in the almost ideal demand system and the Rotterdam model: will the best specification please stand up?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(29), pages 4169-4183, October.
    8. Ferenc Kiss & Bernard Lefebvre, 1987. "Econometric models of telecommunications firms : a survey," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(2), pages 307-374.
    9. Wilson, William W., 1984. "Estimation Of Modal Demand Elasticities In Grain Transportation," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Apostolos Serletis & Guohua Feng, 2015. "Imposing Theoretical Regularity on Flexible Functional Forms," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1-2), pages 198-227, February.
    11. Giancarlo Moschini, 1988. "The Cost Structure of Ontario Dairy Farms: A Microeconometric Analysis," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 36(2), pages 187-206, July.
    12. Sajid Hussain & Uzma Nisar & Waseem Akram, 2020. "An Analysis of the Cost Structure of Food Industries in Pakistan: An Application of the Translog Cost Function," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 25(2), pages 1-22, July-Dec.
    13. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Measuring Consumer Preferences and Estimating Demand Systems," MPRA Paper 12318, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Kesavan, Thulasiram, 1988. "Monte Carlo experiments of market demand theory," ISU General Staff Papers 198801010800009854, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Andreas Andrikopoulos & John Loizides, 2000. "The demand for home-produced and imported alcoholic beverages in Cyprus: the AIDS approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(9), pages 1111-1119.
    16. Sarker, Dr. Rakhal & Koto, Prosper & Cassidy, Heather, 2015. "A Demand System for Major Dairy Products in Ontario," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212689, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. William A. Barnett & Ikuyasu Usui, 2007. "The Theoretical Regularity Properties of the Normalized Quadratic Consumer Demand Model," International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, in: Functional Structure Inference, pages 107-127, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    18. Adrian R. Fleissig, 2016. "Changing Trends in U.S. Alcohol Demand," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 44(3), pages 263-276, September.
    19. William A. Barnett & Isaac Kalonda Kanyama, 2013. "Time-varying parameters in the almost ideal demand system and the Rotterdam model: will the best specification please stand up?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(29), pages 4169-4183, October.
    20. Wilson, William W., 1982. "Estimation of Demand Elasticities for Transportation Modes in Grain Transportation," Agricultural Economics Reports 23266, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:37:y:1998:i:4:p:1031-1050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.