IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v29y1990i2p111-122.html

Land Agglomeration under Changing Technology: Some Inferences from Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • M. Ghaffar Chaudhry

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Islamabad.)

Abstract

The paper studies the intertemporal trend of land distribution with a view to checking the legitimacy of the thesis that land distribution deteriorated under the Green Revolution in Pakistan by examining the arguments given in support of this thesis. The empirical evidence cited in this study indicates that land distribution in Pakistan either improved (as from 1960 to 1972) or remained unchanged (as between 1972 and 1980). This trend in land distribution serves to show that technological changes were accompanied by significant improvements in land distribution between 1960 and 1980. Large increases in the ownership area of small farmers between 1972 and 1980 vis-a-vis the decreases in the ownership area of large farmers during the same period render untenable the view that Green Revolution led to a worsening of land distribution because of land purchases by large farmers. Substantial gains in the operational area of large farmers, due either to large areas of land rented in or to increased self-cultivation, appear to be unlikely in view of the continued and rising dependence of those farmers on tenants. Favourable changes in the distribution of ownership and operational holdings seem to be the result of the widespread impact of Green Revolution on the profitability of agriculture, growing labour* scarcities, land reforms, inheritance laws, and the general trends in the economic development of Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Ghaffar Chaudhry, 1990. "Land Agglomeration under Changing Technology: Some Inferences from Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 111-122.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:29:y:1990:i:2:p:111-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1990/Volume2/111-122.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Ghaffar Chaudhry, 1986. "Mechanization and Agricultural Development in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 25(4), pages 431-449.
    2. Champernowne, D G, 1974. "A Comparison of Measures of Inequality of Income Distribution," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 84(336), pages 787-816, December.
    3. Nomaan Majid & Khalid M Nadvi, 1987. "Agrarian Transition in Sind: An Analysis of Interlinked Rural Factor Markets," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 433-446.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melmed-Sanjak, Jolyne & Bloch, Peter C. & Hanson, Robert, 1998. "Project For The Analysis Of Land Tenure And Agricultural Productivity In The Republic Of Macedonia," Working Papers 12798, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satya R. Chakravarty & Pietro Muliere, 2003. "Welfare indicators: A review and new perspectives. 1. Measurement of inequality," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 457-497.
    2. Camacho Cuena, Eva & Neugebauer, Tibor & Seidl, Christian, 2005. "Compensating justice beats leaky buckets: an experimental investigation," Economics Working Papers 2005-06, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    3. Abbas Ali Chandio & Yuansheng Jiang & Abdul Rauf & Fayyaz Ahmad & Waqas Amin & Khurram Shehzad, 2020. "Assessment of Formal Credit and Climate Change Impact on Agricultural Production in Pakistan: A Time Series ARDL Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Moore, Robert E., 1996. "Ranking income distributions using the Geometric Mean and a related general measure," MPRA Paper 10171, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Paolo Figini, 1998. "Inequality Measures, Equivalence Scales and Adjustment for Household Size and Composition," Economics Technical Papers 988, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    6. van der Hoek, M. Peter, 1999. "Income Distribution Policy In The Netherlands: A Paradigm Shift," MPRA Paper 5884, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Wang, Chen & Caminada, Koen, 2011. "Disentangling income inequality and the redistributive effect of social transfers and taxes in 36 LIS countries," MPRA Paper 32821, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Saboohi, Y., 2001. "An evaluation of the impact of reducing energy subsidies on living expenses of households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 245-252, February.
    9. Rodolfo Hoffmann & Diego Camargo Botassio, 2020. "Sensitivity of inequality measures considering regressive transfers with fixed relative income distance," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 78(3), pages 279-296, December.
    10. Johan Fourie & Dieter von Fintel, 2010. "The dynamics of inequality in a newly settled, pre-industrial society: the case of the Cape Colony," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 4(3), pages 229-267, October.
    11. Jacqueline Hettel Tidwell & Abraham Tidwell & Steffan Nelson, 2018. "Surveying the Solar Power Gap: Assessing the Spatial Distribution of Emerging Photovoltaic Solar Adoption in the State of Georgia, U.S.A," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Parro, Francisco, 2024. "Unveiling the impact of income taxes on inequality in a HACT model," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Chhavi Tiwari & Sankalpa Bhattacharjee & Debkumar Chakrabarti, 2020. "Investigating Regional Inequalities in India: Are Indian Districts Converging?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 684-716, July.
    14. Wojan, Timothy R. & Maung, Adam C., 1998. "The Debate Over State-Level Inequality:Transparent Method, Rules of Evidence, and Empirical Power," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 28(1), pages 63-80, Summer.
    15. Morgan Reynolds & Eugene Smolensky, 1977. "Post-Fisc Distributions of Income in 1950, 1961, and 1970," Public Finance Review, , vol. 5(4), pages 419-438, October.
    16. Shahina Amin & Julie DaVanzo, 2002. "The Impact of Wives' Earnings Inequality among Married-Couple Households in Malaysia," Working Papers 02-09, RAND Corporation.
    17. Amin, Shahina & DaVanzo, Julie, 2004. "The impact of wives' earnings on earnings inequality among married-couple households in Malaysia," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 49-70, February.
    18. Corra, Greg S. & Butler, Leslie J. & Cornell, L.D., 1982. "A Note on Measuring Income Instability and Inequality on Australian Sheep Farms," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(01), pages 1-9, April.
    19. Michel Sollogoub, 1988. "L'inégalité des revenus primaires en France de 1962 à 1979," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 39(3), pages 545-572.
    20. Rüb, Daniel, 2024. "Inequality beyond income quantiles: Distributional effects of climate mitigation policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:29:y:1990:i:2:p:111-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.