IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pet/annals/v18y2018i1p121-132.html

Tax Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment Flows in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Jamani Ndubuisi

    (University of Benin, Nigeria)

  • Ruth Osaretin Urhoghide

    (Benson Idahosa University, Nigeria)

Abstract

The study examined the effect of tax incentives on FDI flows with particular emphasis on the Pioneer Status Tax holiday scheme. This study is conducted by utilizing ordinary least square regression on time series data to observe the relationship between FDI inflow and a list of explanatory variables particularly tax incentives measured using the PSTH during period 2000Q1 – 2016Q4. Secondary data was sourced from the CBN statistical bulletins, National Bureau of Statistics and the Federal Inland Revenue service. To empirically analyse the long-run relationships, the unit root test was conducted for the variables to ascertain their stationarity status, next, the Engle and Granger procedure for cointegration testing was also applied to ensure the existence of a long run relationship between the variables. Finally, the regression analysis was conducted. The findings showed that PSTH has some effect on FDI flows into sectors. Though, its significance appeared not to be pervasive across majority of the sectors. The results suggest that firstly, it is likely that more economic fundamentals will matter more than simply incentive and the response of FDI flows to tax incentives and secondly, the effect of tax incentives will also be largely moderated by the nature of business or industry characteristics. Given the presence of heterogeneity associated with different sectors, the incentives are unlikely to be similar in their effects. The study concludes that there is the need to ensure thorough coordination of tax incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamani Ndubuisi & Ruth Osaretin Urhoghide, 2018. "Tax Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment Flows in Nigeria," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 18(1), pages 121-132.
    • Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:18:y:2018:i:1:p:121-132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.upet.ro/annals/economics/pdf/2018/p1/Ndubuisi-Urhoghide.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:6014 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Abdul Rahim Ridzuan & Muhammad Waqas Khalid & Nur Izzati Zarin & Mohd Idham Md Razak & Abdul Rauf Ridzuan & Irzan Ismail & Norsabrena Norizan, 2018. "The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment, Domestic Investment, Trade Openness And Population on Economic Growth: Evidence from Asean-5 Countries," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(1), pages 128-143, January.
    3. Raymond Vernon, 1966. "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(2), pages 190-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Hung-Ju, 2019. "Innovation and FDI: Does the Target of Intellectual Property Rights Matter?," MPRA Paper 94692, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Iamsiraroj, Sasi, 2016. "The foreign direct investment–economic growth nexus," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 116-133.
    3. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2017. "Global Dynamics, Capabilities and the Crisis," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Uwe Cantner (ed.), Foundations of Economic Change, pages 83-106, Springer.
    4. Jani Bekő, 2003. "Causality between exports and economic growth: empirical estimates for slovenia," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(2), pages 169-186.
    5. Morris, Sebastian, 2007. "Agriculture: A Perspective from History, the Metrics of Comparative Advantage, and Limitations of the Market to Understand the Role of State in a Globalising World," IIMA Working Papers WP2007-02-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    6. Robert Z. Lawrence & Lawrence Edward, 2010. "Do Developed and Developing Countries Compete Head to Head in High Tech?," Working Paper Series WP10-8, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    7. R. B. Radin Firdaus & Osman Mohamad & Taufik Mohammad & Mahinda Senevi Gunaratne, 2020. "Community Partnership Through Knowledge Transfer Program: Assessment From the Perspectives of Academics’ Experience," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    8. Nagesh Kumar, 1998. "Multinational enterprises, regional economic integration, and export-platform production in the host countries: An empirical analysis for the US and Japanese corporations," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 134(3), pages 450-483, September.
    9. Kox, Henk L.M. & Leeuwen, George van & Wiel, Henry van der, 2010. "Competitive, but too small - productivity and entry-exit determinants in European business services," MPRA Paper 24389, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Yuichi Furukawa & Taro Akiyama, 2006. "Innovation, standardization, and imitation in the product cycle model," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 6(13), pages 1-10.
    11. Martin Henning & Hans Westlund & Kerstin Enflo, 2023. "Urban–rural population changes and spatial inequalities in Sweden," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 878-892, May.
    12. Richard Harris & John Moffat, 2011. "R&D, Innovation and Exporting," SERC Discussion Papers 0073, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    13. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    14. Westhead, Paul & Wright, Mike & Ucbasaran, Deniz, 2001. "The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 333-358, July.
    15. Andrea Coveri & Antonello Zanfei, 2023. "Who wins the race for knowledge-based competitiveness? Comparing European and North American FDI patterns," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 292-330, February.
    16. Beschorner, Patrick Frank Ernst, 2008. "Do Shorter Product Cycles Induce Patent Thickets?," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-098, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2002. "Az informatikai szektor és a felzárkózó gazdaságok [The informatics sector and the advancing economies]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 794-804.
    18. repec:use:tkiwps:1818 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Daron Acemoglu & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2001. "Productivity Differences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(2), pages 563-606.
    20. Braunerhjelm, Pontus & Halldin, Torbjörn, 2019. "Born globals – presence, performance and prospects," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 60-73.
    21. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H87 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:18:y:2018:i:1:p:121-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imola Driga (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.