IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04757-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The neurotechnology patent landscape in a time of neuroethics

Author

Listed:
  • Ari Rotenberg

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Stacey Anderson-Redick

    (University of Calgary)

  • Zelma H. T. Kiss

    (University of Calgary)

  • Judy Illes

    (University of British Columbia)

Abstract

Patents in the domain of neurotechnology encompass a wide range of advances in imaging and modulation, with applications spanning healthcare, recreation, marketing, and education. As the number of neurotechnology patent applications filed annually continues to multiply, the importance of responsible innovation and anticipatory practices to ensure resulting benefits and mitigate potential harms also grows. To date, key ethical principles based on empirical analyses to guide these goals have not yet been fully articulated. Here, a novel method that builds on prior neuroethical approaches to neurotechnology patent characterization is described. Its rigorous application to a broad sample set of United States (US) patents identified ethical concerns of scientific validity, mental privacy, and mental integrity. The results highlight key ethics principles for consideration in the neurotechnology invention-to-commercialization pipeline, and as they may be adapted to other technological domains.

Suggested Citation

  • Ari Rotenberg & Stacey Anderson-Redick & Zelma H. T. Kiss & Judy Illes, 2025. "The neurotechnology patent landscape in a time of neuroethics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04757-4
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04757-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04757-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04757-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E Richard Gold & Warren Kaplan & James Orbinski & Sarah Harland-Logan & Sevil N-Marandi, 2010. "Are Patents Impeding Medical Care and Innovation?," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-5, January.
    2. Williams, Robin & Edge, David, 1996. "The social shaping of technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 865-899, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberts, Rhonda, 1998. "Managing innovation: The pursuit of competitive advantage and the design of innovation intense environments," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 159-175, June.
    2. Benjamin Cole & Preeta Banerjee, 2013. "Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 555-574, July.
    3. Al Lily, Abdulrahman Essa & Ismail, Abdelrahim Fathy & Abunasser, Fathi Mohammed & Alhajhoj Alqahtani, Rafdan Hassan, 2020. "Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Geels, Frank W., 2006. "The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840-1930): The dynamics of regime transformation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1069-1082, September.
    5. Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo, 2007. "Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 631-647, August.
    6. Gruber, Mario, 2020. "An evolutionary perspective on adoption-diffusion theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 535-541.
    7. Tylecote, Andrew, 2019. "Biotechnology as a new techno-economic paradigm that will help drive the world economy and mitigate climate change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 858-868.
    8. Chenyang Wang & Linxiu Wang & Tiantian Gu & Enyang Hao & Yujie Chen & Huanjie Zhang, 2024. "Evaluating Smart Community Development in China from the Perspective of Residents’ Sense of Safety: An Analysis Using Criteria Importance through Intercriteria Correlation and Fuzzy Comprehensive Eval," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Unruh, Gregory C. & Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier, 2006. "Globalizing carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1185-1197, July.
    10. Dorothea Hilhorst & Kees Boersma & Emmanuel Raju, 2020. "Research on Politics of Disaster Risk Governance: Where Are We Headed?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 214-219.
    11. Mikayla Novak, 2019. "Crypto-friendliness: understanding blockchain public policy," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 165-184, September.
    12. Martin, Ben R. & Nightingale, Paul & Yegros-Yegros, Alfredo, 2012. "Science and technology studies: Exploring the knowledge base," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1182-1204.
    13. Alba Barrero Caballero, 2023. "Comportamiento de consumo de los millennials y estrategias comunicativas en Facebook e Instagram del sector de la moda 2016-2019," DOCFRADIS Working Papers 2303, Catedra Fundación Ramón Areces de Distribución Comercial, revised Apr 2023.
    14. Martin Bichler & Ulrich Frank & David Avison & Julien Malaurent & Peter Fettke & Dirk Hovorka & Jan Krämer & Daniel Schnurr & Benjamin Müller & Leena Suhl & Bernhard Thalheim, 2016. "Theories in Business and Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(4), pages 291-319, August.
    15. Undheim, Trond Arne, 2024. "In search of better methods for the longitudinal assessment of tech-derived X-risks: How five leading scenario planning efforts can help," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Wallace, Matthew L. & Ràfols, Ismael, 2018. "Institutional shaping of research priorities: A case study on avian influenza," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1975-1989.
    17. Scott, Susan V., 1999. "IT-enabled credit risk modernization: a revolution under the cloak of normality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 37871, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Hyysalo, Sampsa & Usenyuk, Svetlana, 2015. "The user dominated technology era: Dynamics of dispersed peer-innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 560-576.
    19. Ratana SOM & Raksmey CHAN & Danut DUMITRASCU, 2020. "Understanding Type, Process And Elements Of Change: A Conceptual Review On The Framework Of Change Management," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 487-496, November.
    20. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Beyond the triangle of renewable energy acceptance: The five dimensions of domestic hydrogen acceptance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04757-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.