IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03768-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Southeast Asia countries’ potential in the semiconductor supply chain: an objectively weighting multi-criteria decision-making approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Nan Wang

    (National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology)

  • Nhat-Luong Nhieu

    (National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology)

  • Chen-Te Chiang

    (National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology)

  • Yen-Hui Wang

    (Chihlee University of Technology)

Abstract

The semiconductor industry serves as a key enabler of technological progress and economic growth on a global scale. With Southeast Asia emerging as a region of increasing importance in the global supply chain landscape, understanding the potential for its countries to participate in the semiconductor supply chain becomes crucial. Despite extensive research on global supply chain dynamics, a focused analysis on the role of Southeast Asia within this crucial industry has been notably absent, particularly considering recent geopolitical and economic shifts. This gap has been filled by employing a rigorously designed Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach that integrates the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Data on fifteen indicators, including economic stability, technological innovation capacity, and infrastructural capabilities, were collected and identified through an extensive literature review and consultations with stakeholders. These indicators were weighted using the CRITIC method to reflect their relative importance, and each country’s position relative to an ideal solution was assessed using the TOPSIS method. It was revealed that countries such as Singapore and Malaysia possess significant potential due to their advanced technological infrastructure and stable economic environments. Other countries, like Vietnam and Indonesia, were also found to exhibit promising capabilities, albeit with certain limitations. The study highlights the varying strengths and strategic areas that should be considered by policymakers and investors to enhance integration into the global semiconductor supply chain. Significant contributions to the strategic decision-making process have been made by providing a nuanced analysis of the region’s readiness and identifying specific areas for investment and policy intervention. By offering a methodological framework that can be adapted to other regions and sectors, not only has an existing research void been filled, but the practical understanding of effectively leveraging Southeast Asia’s potential in the semiconductor industry has also been enhanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Nan Wang & Nhat-Luong Nhieu & Chen-Te Chiang & Yen-Hui Wang, 2024. "Assessing Southeast Asia countries’ potential in the semiconductor supply chain: an objectively weighting multi-criteria decision-making approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03768-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03768-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03768-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03768-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stevan Djenadic & Milos Tanasijevic & Predrag Jovancic & Dragan Ignjatovic & Dejan Petrovic & Ugljesa Bugaric, 2022. "Risk Evaluation: Brief Review and Innovation Model Based on Fuzzy Logic and MCDM," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Moktadir, Md Abdul & Ren, Jingzheng, 2024. "Global semiconductor supply chain resilience challenges and mitigation strategies: A novel integrated decomposed fuzzy set Delphi, WINGS and QFD model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    3. Wen-Tien Tsai, 2023. "Perspectives on the Promotion of Solid Recovered Fuels in Taiwan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-9, March.
    4. Junyi Lin & Virginia L.M. Spiegler & M.M. Naim, 2018. "Dynamic analysis and design of a semiconductor supply chain: a control engineering approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(13), pages 4585-4611, July.
    5. Jeng-Bang Wang & Guan-Hua Wang & Chung-Ya Ou, 2023. "The Key Factors for Sustainability Reporting Adoption in the Semiconductor Industry Using the Hybrid FRST-PSO Technique and Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Guilherme F. Frederico, 2021. "From Supply Chain 4.0 to Supply Chain 5.0: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review and Research Directions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Chia-Nan Wang & Nhat-Luong Nhieu & Yu-Chi Chung & Huynh-Tram Pham, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimization Models for Sustainable Perishable Intermodal Multi-Product Networks with Delivery Time Window," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Fakhrul Hasan & Mary Fiona Ross Bellenstedt & Mohammad Raijul Islam, 2023. "Demand and Supply Disruptions During the Covid-19 Crisis on Firm Productivity," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 87-105, March.
    9. Imane Tronnebati & Manal El Yadari & Fouad Jawab, 2022. "A Review of Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Issues Using MCDM, MP and AI Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    11. Qiu, Hailing & Tseng, Shuan Wei & Zhang, Xuan & Huang, Caiyan & Wu, Kuo-Jui, 2024. "Revealing the compound interrelationships toward sustainable transition in semiconductor supply chain: A sensitivity analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    12. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    13. Keil, Sophia, 2017. "Design of a cyber-physical production system for semiconductor manufacturing," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg Inter, volume 23, pages 319-340, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    14. Chia-Nan Wang & Nhat-Luong Nhieu & Wei-Lin Liu, 2024. "Unveiling the landscape of Fintech in ASEAN: assessing development, regulations, and economic implications by decision-making approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Chia-Nan Wang & Nhat-Luong Nhieu & Trang Thi Thu Tran, 2021. "Stochastic Chebyshev Goal Programming Mixed Integer Linear Model for Sustainable Global Production Planning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Dabo Guan & Daoping Wang & Stephane Hallegatte & Steven J. Davis & Jingwen Huo & Shuping Li & Yangchun Bai & Tianyang Lei & Qianyu Xue & D’Maris Coffman & Danyang Cheng & Peipei Chen & Xi Liang & Bing, 2020. "Global supply-chain effects of COVID-19 control measures," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 577-587, June.
    17. Aksel Botne Sandberg & Eirik Klementsen & Gerrit Muller & Adrian De Andres & Jéromine Maillet, 2016. "Critical Factors Influencing Viability of Wave Energy Converters in Off-Grid Luxury Resorts and Small Utilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karmaker, Chitra Lekha & Bari, A.B.M. Mainul & Anam, Md. Zahidul & Ahmed, Tazim & Ali, Syed Mithun & de Jesus Pacheco, Diego Augusto & Moktadir, Md. Abdul, 2023. "Industry 5.0 challenges for post-pandemic supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Zhang, Mengdi & Yang, Wanting & Zhao, Zhiheng & Wang, Shuaian & Huang, George Q., 2024. "Do fairness concerns matter for ESG decision-making? Strategic interactions in digital twin-enabled sustainable semiconductor supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Paul, Ananna & Shukla, Nagesh & Trianni, Andrea, 2023. "Modelling supply chain sustainability challenges in the food processing sector amid the COVID-19 outbreak," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    7. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    9. Juuso Pajasmaa & Kaisa Miettinen & Johanna Silvennoinen, 2025. "Group Decision Making in Multiobjective Optimization: A Systematic Literature Review," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 329-371, April.
    10. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    11. Željko Stević & Irena Đalić & Dragan Pamučar & Zdravko Nunić & Slavko Vesković & Marko Vasiljević & Ilija Tanackov, 2019. "A new hybrid model for quality assessment of scientific conferences based on Rough BWM and SERVQUAL," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 1-30, April.
    12. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Modeling personalized cognition of customers in online shopping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Ravindra Singh Saluja & Varinder Singh, 2023. "Attribute-based characterization, coding, and selection of joining processes using a novel MADM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 616-655, June.
    14. Malin Song & Sai Yuan & Hongguang Bo & Jinbo Song & Xiongfeng Pan & Kairui Jin, 2024. "Robust optimization model of anti-epidemic supply chain under technological innovation: learning from COVID-19," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1331-1361, April.
    15. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    16. Kavitha, S. & Satheeshkumar, J. & Amudha, T., 2024. "Multi-label feature selection using q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach extended to CODAS," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 148-173.
    17. Sebestyén, Tamás & Szabó, Norbert & Braun, Emese & Bedő, Zsolt, 2024. "Lokális reziliencia számítása térbeli általános egyensúlyi modell felhasználásával [Measuring local resilience with a spatial computable general equilibrium model]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1222-1253.
    18. Junli Zhang & Guoteng Wang & Zheng Xu & Zheren Zhang, 2022. "A Comprehensive Evaluation Method and Strengthening Measures for AC/DC Hybrid Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    20. Lazebnik, Teddy & Shami, Labib & Bunimovich-Mendrazitsky, Svetlana, 2023. "Intervention policy influence on the effect of epidemiological crisis on industry-level production through input–output networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03768-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.