IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v22y2020i1d10.1057_s41278-019-00138-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Port Choice Determinants and Port Hinterlands: Findings from an Empirical Analysis of Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Jordi Caballé Valls

    () (University of Málaga)

  • Peter W. Langen

    (Copenhagen Business School)

  • Lorena García Alonso

    (University of Oviedo)

  • José Ángel Vallejo Pinto

    (University of Oviedo)

Abstract

In the present work, the determinants of port choice regarding container cargoes from specific hinterland regions are analyzed, based on an empirical study of Spain. Previous work has been extended by including novel explanatory variables for the market shares of ports in hinterland locations. Discrete choice theory is the methodological approach used here. More specifically, a nested logit model is proposed. As potential explanatory variables, the model includes maritime connectivity to specific overseas regions and intermodal connectivity of the port to specific hinterland locations. The empirical analysis is based on detailed Spanish customs data. The analysis shows that all variables hypothesized to influence the market share of a port in a specific hinterland region (i.e., road distance to the hinterland region, maritime distance, maritime connectivity of the port, and intermodal connectivity of the port) indeed influence significantly its market share, with the signs as expected. The findings add to the understanding of port competitiveness in specific regions with three conclusions: First, port hinterlands are relational, in the sense that they depend on the overseas origin or destination of the cargo; Second, the analysis suggests that ports that predominantly handle transhipment cargoes may have a “transhipment orientation,” which is an impediment for reaching hinterland markets; Third, intermodal connectivity is a determinant of the market share of a port in a certain hinterland region.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordi Caballé Valls & Peter W. Langen & Lorena García Alonso & José Ángel Vallejo Pinto, 2020. "Understanding Port Choice Determinants and Port Hinterlands: Findings from an Empirical Analysis of Spain," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 53-67, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:22:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41278-019-00138-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41278-019-00138-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41278-019-00138-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volker Nitsch, 2000. "National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 33(4), pages 1091-1105, November.
    2. Matthieu Crozet, 2004. "Do migrants follow market potentials? An estimation of a new economic geography model," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 439-458, August.
    3. Javier Cantillo & Victor Cantillo & Julián Arellana, 2018. "Modelling with joint choice of ports and countries of origin and destination: application to Colombian ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 720-738, August.
    4. Tomasz Brodzicki & Stanislaw Uminski, 2018. "A gravity panel data analysis of foreign trade by regions: the role of metropolises and history," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 261-273, February.
    5. César Ducruet & Sung-Woo Lee & Adolf K.Y. Ng, 2010. "Centrality and vulnerability in liner shipping networks: revisiting the Northeast Asian port hierarchy," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 17-36, January.
    6. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    7. Van den Berg, Roy & De Langen, Peter W., 2011. "Hinterland strategies of port authorities: A case study of the port of Barcelona," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 6-14.
    8. Gordon Wilmsmeier & Jan Hoffmann, 2008. "Liner Shipping Connectivity and Port Infrastructure as Determinants of Freight Rates in the Caribbean," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 130-151, March.
    9. Moura, Ticiana Grecco Zanon & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena & Salas-Olmedo, María Henar, 2017. "Delimiting the scope of the hinterland of ports: Proposal and case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 35-43.
    10. Ducruet, César, 2017. "Multilayer dynamics of complex spatial networks: The case of global maritime flows (1977–2008)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 47-58.
    11. Fan, Lei & Wilson, William W. & Tolliver, Denver, 2010. "Optimal network flows for containerized imports to the United States," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 735-749, September.
    12. Mohamed-Chérif, Fatima & Ducruet, César, 2016. "Regional integration and maritime connectivity across the Maghreb seaport system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 280-293.
    13. Theo E. Notteboom * & Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2005. "Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 297-313, July.
    14. Wang, Grace W.Y. & Zeng, Qingcheng & Li, Kevin & Yang, Jinglei, 2016. "Port connectivity in a logistic network: The case of Bohai Bay, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 341-354.
    15. Malchow, Matthew B. & Kanafani, Adib, 2004. "A disaggregate analysis of port selection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 317-337, July.
    16. M Luo & T A Grigalunas, 2003. "A Spatial-Economic Multimodal Transportation Simulation Model For US Coastal Container Ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(2), pages 158-178, June.
    17. John J Bartholdi & Pisit Jarumaneeroj & Amar Ramudhin, 2016. "A new connectivity index for container ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(3), pages 231-249, September.
    18. Santos, Tiago A. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Development dynamics of the Portuguese range as a multi-port gateway system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 178-188.
    19. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2000. "Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 136(2), pages 284-314, June.
    20. Bruno De Borger & Stef Proost & Kurt Van Dender, 2008. "Private Port Pricing and Public Investment in Port and Hinterland Capacity," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 42(3), pages 527-561, September.
    21. Jean-François Arvis & Vincent Vesin & Robin Carruthers & César Ducruet & Peter de Langen, 2018. "Maritime Networks, Port Efficiency, and Hinterland Connectivity in the Mediterranean," Post-Print halshs-01933726, HAL.
    22. M Flavia Monaco & Luigi Moccia & Marcello Sammarra, 2009. "Operations Research for the management of a transhipment container terminal: The Gioia Tauro case," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(1), pages 7-35, March.
    23. Notteboom, Theo E. & Parola, Francesco & Satta, Giovanni & Pallis, Athanasios A., 2017. "The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 158-173.
    24. Franc, Pierre & Van der Horst, Martijn, 2010. "Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: a theoretical and empirical analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 557-566.
    25. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Wei Yim Yap, 2008. "Competition for transhipment containers by major ports in Southeast Asia: slot capacity analysis," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 89-101, February.
    26. Christophe Theys & Theo E. Notteboom & Athanasios A. Pallis & Peter W. De Langen, 2010. "The Economics Behind the Awarding of Terminals in Seaports: Towards a Research Agenda," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.),International Handbook of Maritime Business, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    27. Ferrari, C. & Parola, F. & Gattorna, E., 2011. "Measuring the quality of port hinterland accessibility: The Ligurian case," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 382-391, March.
    28. Albert Veenstra & Rob Zuidwijk & Eelco van Asperen, 2012. "The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(1), pages 14-32, March.
    29. Halim, Ronald A. & Kwakkel, Jan H. & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2016. "A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 368-384.
    30. Christopher M Anderson & James J Opaluch & Thomas A Grigalunas, 2009. "The Demand for Import Services at US Container Ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(2), pages 156-185, June.
    31. Tavasszy, Lóránt & Minderhoud, Michiel & Perrin, Jean-François & Notteboom, Theo, 2011. "A strategic network choice model for global container flows: specification, estimation and application," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1163-1172.
    32. Luisa Escamilla-Navarro & Leandro García-Menéndez & Eva Pérez-García, 2010. "Integration of foreign trade and maritime transport statistics in Spain," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 347-375, July.
    33. Moura, Ticiana Grecco Zanon & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena & del Rosal, Ignacio, 2018. "Influence of the geographical pattern of foreign trade on the inland distribution of maritime traffic," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 191-200.
    34. Lorena Garcia-Alonso & Jason Monios & José Ángel Vallejo-Pinto, 2019. "Port competition through hinterland accessibility: the case of Spain," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(2), pages 258-277, June.
    35. Simme J Veldman & Ewout H Bückmann, 2003. "A Model on Container Port Competition: An Application for the West European Container Hub-Ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(1), pages 3-22, March.
    36. Bask, Anu & Roso, Violeta & Andersson, Dan & Hämäläinen, Erkki, 2014. "Development of seaport–dry port dyads: two cases from Northern Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-95.
    37. Julián Martínez Moya & María Feo Valero, 2017. "Port choice in container market: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 300-321, May.
    38. Tongzon, Jose L., 2009. "Port choice and freight forwarders," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 186-195, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Port choice; Hinterland; Spain;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:22:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41278-019-00138-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.