IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v32y2019i6p2260-2301..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Investors and Information Acquisition: Implications for Asset Prices and Informational Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Matthijs Breugem
  • Adrian Buss

Abstract

We study the joint portfolio and information choice problem of institutional investors who are concerned about their performance relative to a benchmark. Benchmarking influences information choices through two distinct economic mechanisms. First, benchmarking reduces the number of shares in investors’ portfolios that are sensitive to information. Hence, the value of private information declines. Second, benchmarking limits investors’ willingness to speculate. This not only reduces the value of private information but also adversely affects information aggregation. In equilibrium, investors acquire less information and informational efficiency declines. As a result, return volatility increases, and less-benchmarked institutional investors outperform more-benchmarked ones. Received May 31, 2017; editorial decision July 4, 2018 by Editor Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh. Authors have furnished supplementary code, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthijs Breugem & Adrian Buss, 2019. "Institutional Investors and Information Acquisition: Implications for Asset Prices and Informational Efficiency," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(6), pages 2260-2301.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:32:y:2019:i:6:p:2260-2301.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhy103
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Yong & Kelly, Bryan & Wu, Wei, 2020. "Sophisticated investors and market efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 316-341.
    2. Georgy Chabakauri & Kathy Yuan & Konstantinos E Zachariadis, 2022. "Multi-asset Noisy Rational Expectations Equilibrium with Contingent Claims," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(5), pages 2445-2490.
    3. Dekker, Lennart, 2024. "Essays on asset liquidity and investment funds," Other publications TiSEM 5fc9bf77-84e7-4a36-9e3a-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Shiyang Huang & Yan Xiong & Liyan Yang, 2022. "Skill Acquisition and Data Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 6116-6144, August.
    5. Wang, Jiarui & Liu, Shancun & Yang, Haijun, 2022. "Institutional investor’ proportions and inactive trading," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Sotes-Paladino, Juan & Zapatero, Fernando, 2022. "Carrot and stick: A role for benchmark-adjusted compensation in active fund management," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. Guo, Rui & Jiang, Ying & Li, Ao & Qiu, Zhigang & Wang, Hefei, 2021. "A model of delegation with a VaR constraint," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    8. Buss, Adrian & Breugem, Matthijs & Peress, Joël, 2021. "What do Interest Rates Reveal about the Stock Market? A Noisy Rational Expectations Model of Stock and Bond Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 15766, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Huang, Shiyang & Qiu, Zhigang & Yang, Liyan, 2020. "Institutionalization, delegation, and asset prices," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Sheng, Jiliang & Xu, Si & An, Yunbi & Yang, Jun, 2022. "Dynamic asset pricing in delegated investment: An investigation from the perspective of heterogeneous beliefs of institutional and retail investors," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. Buss, Adrian & Sundaresan, Savitar, 2020. "More Risk, More Information: How Passive Ownership Can Improve Informational Efficiency," CEPR Discussion Papers 14843, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Chabakauri, Georgy & Rytchkov, Oleg, 2021. "Asset pricing with index investing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 195-216.
    13. Hervé Roche & Juan Sotes-Paladino, 2022. "Sentiment, Mispricing and Excess Volatility in Presence of Institutional Investors," Working Papers 205, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    14. Coles, Jeffrey L. & Heath, Davidson & Ringgenberg, Matthew C., 2022. "On index investing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 665-683.
    15. Min Bai & Feng Bai & Yafeng Qin, 2022. "Emerging economies openness and efficiency," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 659-672, April.
    16. Michael Sockin & Mindy Z Xiaolan, 2023. "Delegated Learning and Contract Commonality in Asset Management," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(6), pages 1931-1975.
    17. Ailie Charteris & Conrad Alexander Steyn, 2023. "The Bank of Japan’s exchange traded fund purchases: a help or hindrance to market efficiency?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 225-240, May.
    18. Danny Zhao‐Xiang Huang, 2022. "Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm value: valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1983-2010, April.
    19. Guo, Huichao & Lou, Youcheng, 2023. "The impact of relative wealth concerns on wealth gap and welfare in a noisy rational expectations economy," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:32:y:2019:i:6:p:2260-2301.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.