IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v72y1958i3p380-423..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critique of Concepts of Workable Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen H. Sosnick

Abstract

Introduction, 380. — I. The nature of the theory of workable competition, 383. — II. The several concepts of workability, 386. — III. Performance norms and value judgments, 391. — IV. Necessary vs. sufficient conditions, 395. — V. Remediability vs. categorical norms, 402. — VI. The workability criterion reformulated, 410. — Appendix, 415.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen H. Sosnick, 1958. "A Critique of Concepts of Workable Competition," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 72(3), pages 380-423.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:72:y:1958:i:3:p:380-423.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882232
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jhuma Mukhopadhyay & Indrani Chakraborty, 2017. "Competition and Industry Performance: A Panel VAR Analysis in Indian Manufacturing Sector," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 15(2), pages 343-366, June.
    2. Mark Glick & Eduardo M. Ochoa, 1990. "Classical and Neoclassical Elements in Industrial Organization," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 197-207, Jul-Sep.
    3. Török, Ádám, 2011. "A dominanciaproblémák tényeinek értelmezése és a közgazdaság-tudományi módszertan [Interpretation of the facts of dominance problems and the methodology of economics]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 41-55.
    4. Centner, Terence J. & Wetzstein, Michael E., 1984. "Cooperative Antitrust Monopolization and the Theory of Contestable Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 129-136, July.
    5. Michael J. Hicks, 2007. "Hierarchical delays as a source of nominal price rigidities: evidence from the microcomputer industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(7), pages 803-815.
    6. Christiansen, Arndt, 2004. "Wettbewerbspolitik und Innovation," EconStor Preprints 268212, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Michiel de Nooij, 2010. "Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Interconnector Investment: A Critical Appraisal," Bremen Energy Working Papers 0002, Bremen Energy Research.
    8. Smith, I.R., 1981. "The economics of the milkfish fry and fingerling industry of the Philippines," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 12314, April.
    9. Gibbons, E. T., 1970. "Co-Operation And The Potato Market," Department of Agricultural Economics Archive 272993, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
    10. Török, Ádám, 2008. "A mezőny és tükörképei. Megjegyzések a magyar felsőoktatási rangsorok hasznáról és korlátairól [The field and reflections of it. Comments on the usefulness and limitations of league tables in Hunga," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 874-890.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:72:y:1958:i:3:p:380-423.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.