IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v28y2025i2p131-173..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On robust inference in time-series regression

Author

Listed:
  • Richard T Baillie
  • Francis X Diebold
  • George Kapetanios
  • Kun Ho Kim
  • Aaron Mora

Abstract

SummaryLeast squares regression with heteroskedasticity consistent standard errors (‘OLS-HC regression’) has proved very useful in cross-section environments. However, several major difficulties, which are generally overlooked, must be confronted when transferring the HC technology to time-series environments via heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent standard errors (‘OLS-HAC regression’). First, in plausible time-series environments, OLS parameter estimates can be inconsistent, so that OLS-HAC inference fails even asymptotically. Second, most economic time series have autocorrelation, which renders OLS parameter estimates inefficient. Third, autocorrelation similarly renders conditional predictions based on OLS parameter estimates inefficient. Finally, the structure of popular HAC covariance matrix estimators is ill-suited for capturing the autoregressive autocorrelation typically present in economic time series, which produces large size distortions and reduced power in HAC-based hypothesis testing, in all but the largest samples. We show that all four problems are largely avoided by the use of a simple and easily implemented dynamic regression procedure, which we call DURBIN. We demonstrate the advantages of DURBIN with detailed simulations covering a range of practical issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard T Baillie & Francis X Diebold & George Kapetanios & Kun Ho Kim & Aaron Mora, 2025. "On robust inference in time-series regression," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 28(2), pages 131-173.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:131-173.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utae019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:131-173.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.