IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v134y2024i660p1331-1355..html

Conservative News Media and Criminal Justice: Evidence from Exposure to the Fox News Channel

Author

Listed:
  • Elliott Ash
  • Michael Poyker

Abstract

Local exposure to conservative news causes judges to impose harsher criminal sentences. Our evidence comes from an instrumental variable analysis, where randomness in television channel positioning across localities induces exogenous variation in exposure to the Fox News Channel. These treatment data on news viewership are taken to outcome data on almost seven million criminal sentencing decisions in the United States for the years 2005–17. Higher Fox News viewership increases incarceration length, and the effect is stronger for Black defendants and for drug-related crimes. We can rule out changes in the behaviour of police, prosecutors or potential offenders as significant drivers. Consistent with changes in voter attitudes as the key mechanism, the effect on sentencing harshness is observed for elected (but not appointed) judges. Fox News viewership also increases self-reported beliefs about the importance of drug crime as a social problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Elliott Ash & Michael Poyker, 2024. "Conservative News Media and Criminal Justice: Evidence from Exposure to the Fox News Channel," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(660), pages 1331-1355.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2024:i:660:p:1331-1355.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/uead108
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sultan Mehmood, 2022. "The Impact of Presidential Appointment of Judges: Montesquieu or the Federalists?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 411-445, October.
    2. Arnaud Philippe & Aurélie Ouss, 2018. ""No Hatred or Malice, Fear or Affection": Media and Sentencing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(5), pages 2134-2178.
    3. Nicola Mastrorocco & Arianna Ornaghi, 2025. "Who Watches the Watchmen? Local News and Police Behavior in the United States," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 285-318, May.
    4. Chen, Daniel L. & Moskowitz, Tobias J. & Shue, Kelly, 2016. "Decision-Making Under the Gambler’s Fallacy: Evidence From Asylum Courts, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires," IAST Working Papers 16-43, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    5. Iaryczower, Matias & Lewis, Garrett & Shum, Matthew, 2013. "To elect or to appoint? Bias, information, and responsiveness of bureaucrats and politicians," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 230-244.
    6. Daniel L. Chen & Tobias J. Moskowitz & Kelly Shue, 2016. "Decision Making Under the Gambler’s Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(3), pages 1181-1242.
    7. Dippel, Christian & Poyker, Michael, 2021. "Rules versus norms: How formal and informal institutions shape judicial sentencing cycles," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 645-659.
    8. Carlos Berdejó & Noam Yuchtman, 2013. "Crime, Punishment, and Politics: An Analysis of Political Cycles in Criminal Sentencing," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(3), pages 741-756, July.
    9. David Card & Stefano DellaVigna, 2020. "What Do Editors Maximize? Evidence from Four Economics Journals," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(1), pages 195-217, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kai Gehring & Matteo Grigoletto, 2025. "Virality: What Makes Narratives Go Viral, and Does it Matter?," CESifo Working Paper Series 12064, CESifo.
    2. Alessandra Foresta1 Rigissa Megalokonomou2 Michael Vlassopoulos3, 2026. "Fiscal Crises and Judicial Enforcement: Evidence from the Greek Supreme Court," Monash Economics Working Papers 2026-11, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    3. Ash, Elliott & Galletta, Sergio & Pinna, Matteo & Warshaw, Christopher S., 2024. "From viewers to voters: Tracing Fox News’ impact on American democracy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Forestra, Alessandra & Megalokonomou, Rigissa & Vlassopoulos, Michael, 2026. "Crisis Narratives and Judicial Enforcement: Evidence from the Greek Fiscal Crisis," IZA Discussion Papers 18489, IZA Network @ LISER.
    5. Oleg Firsin, 2026. "Social networks and spread of immigration attitudes," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 64(2), pages 434-453, April.
    6. Alessandra Foresta & Rigissa Megalokonomou & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2026. "Crisis Narratives and Judicial Enforcement: Evidence from the Greek Fiscal Crisis," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26088, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Forestra, Alessandra & Megalokonomou, Rigissa & Vlassopoulos, Michael, 2026. "Crisis Narratives and Judicial Enforcement: Evidence from the Greek Fiscal Crisis," IZA Discussion Papers 18489, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Alessandra Foresta & Rigissa Megalokonomou & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2026. "Crisis Narratives and Judicial Enforcement: Evidence from the Greek Fiscal Crisis," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26088, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    3. Alessandra Foresta1 Rigissa Megalokonomou2 Michael Vlassopoulos3, 2026. "Fiscal Crises and Judicial Enforcement: Evidence from the Greek Supreme Court," Monash Economics Working Papers 2026-11, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    4. Chen, Daniel L. & Philippe, Arnaud, 2023. "Clash of norms judicial leniency on defendant birthdays," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 324-344.
    5. Trung Nguyen & Aneesh Raghunandan & Alexandra Scherf, 2025. "How Does Judges’ Personal Exposure to Financial Fraud Affect White‐Collar Sentencing?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 63(2), pages 989-1029, May.
    6. Chen, Daniel L. & Reinhart, Eric, 2016. "The Disavowal of Decisionism: Politically Motivated Exits from the U.S. Courts of Appeals," TSE Working Papers 16-721, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Feb 2017.
    7. Philippe, Arnaud, 2017. "Does introducing lay people in criminal courts affect judicial decisions? Evidence from French reform," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-15.
    8. Sultan Mehmood & Bakhtawar Ali, 2024. "Judicial Capture," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(659), pages 1287-1301.
    9. Alan P. Kwan & S. Alex Yang & Angela Huyue Zhang, 2024. "Crowd-Judging on Two-Sided Platforms: An Analysis of In-Group Bias," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2459-2476, April.
    10. Maria R. Ibanez & Michael W. Toffel, 2020. "How Scheduling Can Bias Quality Assessment: Evidence from Food-Safety Inspections," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2396-2416, June.
    11. James Wang, 2020. "Screening soft information: evidence from loan officers," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(4), pages 1287-1322, December.
    12. Benjamin Radoc, 2020. "Bandit with similarity information," Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University, Working Paper Series 202002, Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University.
    13. Benjamin Enke & Uri Gneezy & Brian Hall & David Martin & Vadim Nelidov & Theo Offerman & Jeroen van de Ven, 2020. "Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8168, CESifo.
    14. Paola Criscuolo & Linus Dahlander & Thorsten Grohsjean & Ammon Salter, 2021. "The Sequence Effect in Panel Decisions: Evidence from the Evaluation of Research and Development Projects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 987-1008, July.
    15. Gagnon-Bartsch, Tristan & Bushong, Benjamin, 2022. "Learning with misattribution of reference dependence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Oliphant, Wesley & Ma, Hong, 2021. "Applying Behavioral Economics to microcredit in China’s rural areas," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    17. He, Kevin, 2022. "Mislearning from censored data: The gambler's fallacy and other correlational mistakes in optimal-stopping problems," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(3), July.
    18. Deshpande Sameer K. & Wyner Abraham, 2017. "A hierarchical Bayesian model of pitch framing," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 95-112, September.
    19. Chen, Daniel L., 2023. "Judicial compliance in district courts," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Artiga González, Tanja & Calluzzo, Paul & Granic, Georg D., 2023. "Ballot order effects in independent director elections," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2024:i:660:p:1331-1355.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.