IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cesifo/v52y2006i2p276-303.html

China's Exchange Rate and International Adjustment in Wages, Prices and Interest Rates: Japan Déjà Vu?

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald McKinnon
  • Gunther Schnabl

Abstract

China's fixed its exchange rate at 8.28 yuan to the dollar from 1994 to July 2005, and has only allowed for a small appreciation since then. China's productivity growth has been very high relative to most other countries: its trade surplus has been rising and it continues to accumulate large dollar exchange reserves. Many observers, including high officials in the US government, take this as per se evidence that the renminbi is undervalued. To balance China's international competitiveness and reduce its trade surplus, they want the renminbi to appreciate much more. This common presumption of renminbi undervaluation is wrong, and its appreciation need not reduce China's trade surplus but would cause serious deflation in China. To show this, we consider international adjustment between China and the US from both an asset market and a labor market perspective, and compare this to Japan's unsuccessful appreciation of the yen from 1971 to 1995. During a time of economic catch-up and rapid financial transformation, fixing the exchange rate is the preferred way of anchoring the domestic price level. (JEL codes: F15, F31, F33) Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald McKinnon & Gunther Schnabl, 2006. "China's Exchange Rate and International Adjustment in Wages, Prices and Interest Rates: Japan Déjà Vu?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 52(2), pages 276-303, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:52:y:2006:i:2:p:276-303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cesifo/ifl007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange
    • F33 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:52:y:2006:i:2:p:276-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.