IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i2p505-510..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Morphological defense influences absolute, not relative, nonconsumptive effects in marine snails

Author

Listed:
  • Paul E. Bourdeau

Abstract

Theory predicts that the strength of nonconsumptive predator effects (NCEs) depends on the state of individual prey and their vulnerability to predators. This prediction has rarely been tested, particularly with respect to interspecific variation in the vulnerability of closely related (i.e., within the same genus) guild members within a community. I examined the relationship between morphological vulnerability and predator-induced feeding suppression among 3 species of predatory whelks (Nucella spp.) that differ in their morphological defense—shell armor. Weaker-shelled species (N. ostrina and N. canaliculata) were more vulnerable to predation by crabs (Cancer productus) than the stronger-shelled species (N. lamellosa). Crab cues suppressed feeding in the most vulnerable species to a greater extent than the 2 less vulnerable species in absolute terms, but proportional decreases in feeding due to crab cues were no different among species. Thus, species-specific differences in feeding activity are maintained in the presence of crab cues, suggesting that the degree to which congeneric guild members transmit NCEs is related to constitutive levels of feeding activity rather than morphological defense. These results contrast with the commonly observed pattern of behavioral compensation for weaker morphological defenses in distantly related gastropod species and highlight the importance of examining the absolute and proportional predator-induced changes in behavior of different prey species.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul E. Bourdeau, 2013. "Morphological defense influences absolute, not relative, nonconsumptive effects in marine snails," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 505-510.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:505-510.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars191
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shinichi Nakagawa, 2004. "A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 1044-1045, November.
    2. Dirk Johannes Mikolajewski & Frank Johansson, 2004. "Morphological and behavioral defenses in dragonfly larvae: trait compensation and cospecialization," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(4), pages 614-620, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerad A Fox & Allen M Cooper & William K Hayes, 2015. "The Dilemma of Choosing a Reference Character for Measuring Sexual Size Dimorphism, Sexual Body Component Dimorphism, and Character Scaling: Cryptic Dimorphism and Allometry in the Scorpion Hadrurus a," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Fullman, Timothy J. & Bunting, Erin L. & Kiker, Gregory A. & Southworth, Jane, 2017. "Predicting shifts in large herbivore distributions under climate change and management using a spatially-explicit ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 352(C), pages 1-18.
    3. Bunting, Erin L. & Fullman, Timothy & Kiker, Gregory & Southworth, Jane, 2016. "Utilization of the SAVANNA model to analyze future patterns of vegetation cover in Kruger National Park under changing climate," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 147-160.
    4. Nicola-Anne J Rutkowski & Yong Zhi Foo & Therésa M Jones & Kathryn B McNamara, 2023. "Age, but not an immune challenge, triggers terminal investment in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 468-479.
    5. Roberto Bonanni & Simona Cafazzo & Arianna Abis & Emanuela Barillari & Paola Valsecchi & Eugenia Natoli, 2017. "Age-graded dominance hierarchies and social tolerance in packs of free-ranging dogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1004-1020.
    6. R. C. Rodríguez-Caro & E. Graciá & S. P. Blomberg & H. Cayuela & M. Grace & C. P. Carmona & H. A. Pérez-Mendoza & A. Giménez & R. Salguero-Gómez, 2023. "Anthropogenic impacts on threatened species erode functional diversity in chelonians and crocodilians," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Tilov, Ivan & Weber, Sylvain, 2023. "Heterogeneity in price elasticity of vehicle kilometers traveled: Evidence from micro-level panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    8. Yankol-Schalck, Meryem, 2022. "The value of cross-data set analysis for automobile insurance fraud detection," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. R. Nicholas Carleton & Tracie O. Afifi & Tamara Taillieu & Sarah Turner & Julia E. Mason & Rosemary Ricciardelli & Donald R. McCreary & Adam D. Vaughan & Gregory S. Anderson & Rachel L. Krakauer & Eli, 2020. "Assessing the Relative Impact of Diverse Stressors among Public Safety Personnel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Christopher G. Murphy, 2012. "Simultaneous mate-sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1162-1169.
    11. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    12. Dana M. Williams & Diogo S.M. Samia & William E. Cooper & Daniel T. Blumstein, 2014. "The flush early and avoid the rush hypothesis holds after accounting for spontaneous behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1136-1147.
    13. Steven Bednar & Kathryn Rouse, 2020. "The effect of physical education on children's body weight and human capital: New evidence from the ECLS‐K:2011," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 393-405, April.
    14. Lee Cronk & Athena Aktipis & Steven Gazzillo & Dave White & Amber Wutich & Barry Sopher, 2019. "Common knowledge promotes risk pooling in an experimental economic game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Djankov, Simeon & Nikolova, Elena, 2018. "Communism as the unhappy coming," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 708-721.
    16. Ray, Tridip & Roy Chaudhuri, Arka & Sahai, Komal, 2020. "Whose education matters? An analysis of inter caste marriages in India," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 619-633.
    17. Ryan J. McGill, 2017. "Re(Examining) Relations between CHC Broad and Narrow Cognitive Abilities and Reading Achievement," Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(1), pages 265-265, May.
    18. Christophe Schalck & Meryem Yankol-Schalck, 2021. "Predicting French SME failures: new evidence from machine learning techniques," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(51), pages 5948-5963, November.
    19. Burke, Mary A. & Fournier, Gary M. & Prasad, Kislaya, 2010. "Geographic variations in a model of physician treatment choice with social interactions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 418-432, March.
    20. Caman, Shilan & Kristiansson, Marianne & Granath, Sven & Sturup, Joakim, 2017. "Trends in rates and characteristics of intimate partner homicides between 1990 and 2013," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 14-21.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:505-510.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.