IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v32y2023i1p323-337.html

Factors Influencing The Accounting Information Reporting Of Non-Profit Organizations – A Theoretical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela CIONCA

    (University of Oradea, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Oradea, Romania)

  • Luminiţa RUS

    (University of Oradea, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Oradea, Romania)

  • Victoria BOGDAN

    (University of Oradea, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

In the activity of any economic entity, the efficiency of the use of resources, especially new investments, has a primary place in making decisions to achieve the proposed objectives. The same approach can be found in non-profit entities. The mission of non-profit organizations is not to make any profit but to help others, to protect human and moral values, or to protect the environment. The funds necessary for carrying out the activity do not represent income from the carrying out of the object of activity but primarily represent the participation of civil society and natural or legal persons interested in partnerships with non-profit organizations by offering them donations or sponsorships. The annual reporting of these organizations reveals more and more aspects regarding the efficiency and effectiveness of resources and the way of fulfilling their missions. This research has as its primary objective the identification of users of accounting information provided by nonprofit organizations and the factors that can influence how they report their activity. The research directions aimed to find answers regarding the users of accounting information, the mandatory and voluntary information presented in the annual reporting, the availability of disclosure of information to stakeholders, and the increase of trust and sustainability of NGOs. In this regard, the specialized literature and the legislation in the field regarding mandatory reporting information was studied, as well as the transparency of the voluntary ones in response to the management's responsibility towards the stakeholders in the organization's mission. The conclusions formulated concern the stakeholders, the influencing factors, and the types of information on which they could present presentation claims in the annual reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela CIONCA & Luminiţa RUS & Victoria BOGDAN, 2023. "Factors Influencing The Accounting Information Reporting Of Non-Profit Organizations – A Theoretical Approach," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 323-337, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:323-337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/AUOES.July_.202324.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Luis Moreno-Albarracín & Ana Licerán-Gutierrez & Cristina Ortega-Rodríguez & Álvaro Labella & Rosa M. Rodríguez, 2020. "Measuring What Is Not Seen—Transparency and Good Governance Nonprofit Indicators to Overcome the Limitations of Accounting Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Ebrahim, Alnoor, 2003. "Accountability In Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 813-829, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pascal Dey & Chris Steyaert, 2016. "Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 627-641, February.
    2. Anheier Helmut K. & Toepler Stefan, 2019. "Policy Neglect:The True Challenge to the Nonprofit Sector," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Ronelle Burger & Canh Thien Dang & Trudy Owens, 2017. "Better performing NGOs do report more accurately: Evidence from investigating Ugandan NGO financial accounts," Discussion Papers 2017-10, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    4. Boomsma, Roel & O'Dwyer, Brendan, 2019. "Constituting the governable NGO: The correlation between conduct and counter-conduct in the evolution of funder-NGO accountability relations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-20.
    5. Barr, Abigail & Fafchamps, Marcel & Owens, Trudy, 2005. "The governance of non-governmental organizations in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 657-679, April.
    6. Enriqueta Mancilla-Rendón & Carmen Lozano & Enrique Torres-Esteva, 2021. "Fuzzy Governance Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Urquía-Grande, Elena & Estébanez, Raquel Pérez & Alcaraz-Quiles, Francisco José, 2022. "Impact of Non-Profit Organizations’ Accountability: Empirical evidence from the democratic Republic of Congo," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    8. Bano, Masooda, 2008. "Dangerous Correlations: Aid's Impact on NGOs' Performance and Ability to Mobilize Members in Pakistan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2297-2313, November.
    9. Roberts, Susan M. & Jones III, John Paul & Frohling, Oliver, 2005. "NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1845-1864, November.
    10. Burford, Gemma & Velasco, Ismael & Janoušková, Svatava & Zahradnik, Martin & Hak, Tomas & Podger, Dimity & Piggot, Georgia & Harder, Marie K., 2013. "Field trials of a novel toolkit for evaluating ‘intangible’ values-related dimensions of projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-14.
    11. Bourguignon, François & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2015. "The Hard Challenge of Aid Coordination," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 86-97.
    12. Sampson Addo Yeboah, 2022. "Solving Local Problems or Looking Good: An Ethnography of the Field Practices of Foreign Sponsored NGOs in Rural African Communities," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(3), pages 1645-1661, June.
    13. Brass, Jennifer N., 2012. "Why Do NGOs Go Where They Go? Evidence from Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 387-401.
    14. Vijfeijken Tosca Bruno-van, 2019. "“Culture Is What You See When Compliance Is Not in the Room”: Organizational Culture as an Explanatory Factor in Analyzing Recent INGO Scandals," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Mizanur Rahman, 2023. "Downward Accountability of NGOs in Bangladesh: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Investigation," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 39(3), pages 347-372, September.
    16. Gülem Atab & Şebnem Penbek & Deniz Zaptçioğlu & Ela Burcu Ucel, 2013. "Clash of Generations at Workplace: What does Business Ethics Mean to Different Generations in Turkey?," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, October.
    17. Nichols, Carly, 2020. "Nutrition sensitive agriculture: An equity-based analysis from India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Acharya, Arnab & Martínez-Álvarez, Melisa, 2012. "Aid Effectiveness in the Health Sector," WIDER Working Paper Series 069, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Cuckston, Thomas, 2022. "Accounts of NGO performance as calculative spaces: Wild Animals, wildlife restoration and strategic agency," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Charles T. Crespy & Van V. Miller, 2011. "Sustainability reporting: A comparative study of NGOs and MNCs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 275-284, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:323-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.