IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7275-d409037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring What Is Not Seen—Transparency and Good Governance Nonprofit Indicators to Overcome the Limitations of Accounting Models

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Luis Moreno-Albarracín

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain)

  • Ana Licerán-Gutierrez

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain)

  • Cristina Ortega-Rodríguez

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain)

  • Álvaro Labella

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain)

  • Rosa M. Rodríguez

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Jaén, Paraje Las Lagunillas, s/n, E-23071 Jaén, Spain)

Abstract

One of the most complex challenges currently faced by non-profit organizations (NPOs) is demonstrating that they manage resources with the highest levels of efficiency and excellence, and do not deviate from the accomplishment of their mission. Transparency and good governance are highly valuable issues for the survival of these organizations. However, empirical studies and models to measure these concepts are scarce and lack consensus. The objective of this article is to develop a uniform procedure for measuring the levels of transparency and good governance in NPOs, validated by experts, that integrates the most important contributions. The main proposals are supported by lists of indicators whose compliance they try to verify. Finally, we considered the experts’ preferences to obtain the indicator weights by means of the Best–Worst Method and Minimum Cost Consensus model. The result of our work is the development of a list of indicators, which integrates the existing battery of Spanish indicators. We contribute, with this work, to improving the credibility of the third sector from the perspective of donors, users, public administrations, and society. This is an essential issue for the survival of these NPOs.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Luis Moreno-Albarracín & Ana Licerán-Gutierrez & Cristina Ortega-Rodríguez & Álvaro Labella & Rosa M. Rodríguez, 2020. "Measuring What Is Not Seen—Transparency and Good Governance Nonprofit Indicators to Overcome the Limitations of Accounting Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7275-:d:409037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diarmuid McDonnell & Alasdair C. Rutherford, 2019. "Promoting charity accountability: understanding disclosure of serious incidents," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 42-61, January.
    2. Roger Spear & Chris Cornforth & Mike Aiken, 2009. "The Governance Challenges Of Social Enterprises: Evidence From A Uk Empirical Study," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 247-273, June.
    3. Kathleen Hale, 2013. "Understanding Nonprofit Transparency: The Limits of Formal Regulation in the American Nonprofit Sector," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 31-49, December.
    4. David J. Gilchrist & Roger Simnett, 2019. "Research horizons for public and private not‐for‐profit sector reporting: moving the bar in the right direction," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 59-85, March.
    5. Core, John & Guay, Wayne, 1999. "The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 151-184, December.
    6. Liu, Yaosong & Zhang, Min & Ye, Tingting & Zhang, Yue, 2019. "Does giving always lead to getting? Evidence from the collapse of charity credibility in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Burger, Ronelle & Owens, Trudy, 2010. "Promoting Transparency in the NGO Sector: Examining the Availability and Reliability of Self-Reported Data," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 1263-1277, September.
    8. Hofmann, Mary Ann & McSwain, Dwayne, 2013. "Financial disclosure management in the nonprofit sector: A framework for past and future research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 61-87.
    9. Georgette E. Dumont, 2013. "Transparency or Accountability? The Purpose of Online Technologies for Nonprofits," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 7-29, December.
    10. Xavier Giroud & Holger M. Mueller, 2011. "Corporate Governance, Product Market Competition, and Equity Prices," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(2), pages 563-600, April.
    11. Wellens, Lore & Jegers, Marc, 2014. "Effective governance in nonprofit organizations: A literature based multiple stakeholder approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 223-243.
    12. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    13. Galina Goncharenko, 2019. "The accountability of advocacy NGOs: insights from the online community of practice," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 135-160, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuyang Wang & Xiaoyu Wu & Zhilin Li & Jing-Hua Zhang, 2021. "Tax-Exempt Status and Associated Factors among Charitable Foundations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Enriqueta Mancilla-Rendón & Carmen Lozano & Enrique Torres-Esteva, 2021. "Fuzzy Governance Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Ortega-Rodríguez & Ana Licerán-Gutiérrez & Antonio Luis Moreno-Albarracín, 2020. "Transparency as a Key Element in Accountability in Non-Profit Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Young Mok Choi & Kunsu Park, 2019. "Foreign Ownership, Agency Costs, and Long-Term Firm Growth: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Huang, Minjie & Kubick, Thomas R. & Tseng, Kevin, 2021. "Technology spillovers and the duration of executive compensation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Feiran Dong & Yongzhen Xie & Linjun Cao, 2019. "Board Power Hierarchy, Corporate Mission, and Green Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-27, September.
    5. Mercedes Rodríguez-Fernández & Ana I. Gaspar-González & Eva M. Sánchez-Teba, 2020. "Does Diversity in Top Management Teams Contribute to Organizational Performance? The Response of the IBEX 35 Companies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Shuo Han & Weijun Cui & Jin Chen & Yu Fu, 2019. "Why Do Companies Choose Female CEOs?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-36, July.
    7. Gianpaolo Abatecola & Matteo Cristofaro, 2019. "Ingredients of Sustainable CEO Behaviour: Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Jaehong Lee & Eunsoo Kim, 2019. "Foreign Monitoring and Predictability of Future Cash Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Yuan Li & Xiyuan Li & Qingmin Chen & Ying Xue, 2020. "Sustainable Career Development of Newly Hired Executives—A Dynamic Process Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Paul Moon Sub Choi & Joung Hwa Choi & Chune Young Chung & Yun Joo An, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Capital Structure: Evidence from Sustainable Institutional Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-8, May.
    11. Edyta Bombiak & Anna Marciniuk-Kluska, 2019. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management as a Concept of Fostering Sustainable Organization-Building: Experiences of Young Polish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, February.
    12. José Miguel Tirado-Beltrán & Iluminada Fuertes-Fuertes & J. David Cabedo, 2020. "Donor Reaction to Non-Financial Information Covering Social Projects in Nonprofits: A Spanish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Hongmin Chun & Jaeyon Chu & Yongsuk Yun, 2019. "The Impact of Corporate Charitable Contributions on Audit Hours," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, February.
    14. Daeheon Choi & Chune Young Chung & Changhyeon Park & Jason Young, 2019. "Sustainable Board of Directors: Evidence from the Research Productivity of Professors Serving on Boards in the Korean Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Mariana Hatmanu & Christiana Brigitte Sandu & Elisabeta Jaba, 2019. "A Comparative Study on Drivers for Corporate Environmental Responsibility, EU15 vs. EU-NMS13," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Elka Johansson & Peter Carey & George Tanewski & Iliyas Yusoff, 2022. "The effect of members on charities’ annual reporting: evidence from companies limited by guarantee in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1851-1886, April.
    17. Elif Akben-Selcuk, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-10, July.
    18. Ko, Hin-cheung Annie & Tong, Yixing (Jamie) & Zhang, Feida (Frank) & Zheng, Guojian, 2016. "Corporate governance, product market competition and managerial incentives: Evidence from four Pacific Basin countries," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 491-502.
    19. Luisa Esteban-Salvador & Ana F. Gargallo-Castel, 2019. "Female Executives in the Service Sector: The Case of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Jim-Yuh Huang & Kao-Yi Shen & Joseph C.P. Shieh & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2019. "Strengthen Financial Holding Companies’ Business Sustainability by Using a Hybrid Corporate Governance Evaluation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7275-:d:409037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.