IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2015i2p742-748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutions In Implementing Structural And Cohesion Funds In

Author

Listed:
  • Felix Angel Popescu

    (Doctoral School in Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania,)

Abstract

For the purposes of the research for doctoral thesis, this article refers to the following 10 EU Member States, which cover the Central and Eastern Europe: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia.The selection was made taking in consideration the appropriate similarities and differences in living standards, population, development orientations and EU Structural and Cohesion Funds allocations. Looking forward, it can be stated that this countries had an estimated share of available European funding, ranging from almost a tenth to approximately a quarter of their annual Gross Domestic Product. A comparison of the absorption rates during the 2007-2014 period can be critical towards reconsidering some theories of potential cohesion impact and reflecting them in current Eurostat statistics. It may be useful to acknowledge that most of the problems in contracting and disbursement of European funding occurred in every of the 10 Member States, nevertheless it cannot be held an underestimation of absorption capacities between the top and the tail countries, whereas some of the related countries (i.e. the 2004 EU accession countries) had more time and some experience in adjusting wrong or insufficient focus on absorption capacity. It is a well known fact that contracting of European Structural and Cohesion Funds started only in 2008 and reached a reasonable level in 2009, while payments tended to lag by a further year. By the end of 2014 most of the 10 Member States had the performance of reaching or overtaking the full contracting ratio, but payment ratios were situated much lower.The absorption process lies in the responsibility of each Member State. According to Hapenciuc et al (2013), the European Comission grants funds, proportional to each state’s GDP, but the institutional system, the procedures, the capacity of the beneficiaries to contract the necessary co-financing are all elements in which national authorities have a decisive role.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix Angel Popescu, 2015. "Evolutions In Implementing Structural And Cohesion Funds In," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 742-748, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:742-748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2015/n2/089.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janos Varga & Jan in 't Veld, 2009. "A model-based assessment of the macroeconomic impact of EU structural funds on the new Member States," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 371, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    2. Benedicta Marzinotto, 2012. "The growth effects of EU cohesion policy- a meta-analysis," Working Papers 754, Bruegel.
    3. Claudiu-Tiberiu ALBULESCU & Daniel GOYEAU, 2013. "EU Funds Absorption Rate and the Economic Growth," Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 6(20), pages 153-170.
    4. Mariana Tomova & Andras Rezessy & Artur Lenkowski & Emmanuelle Maincent, 2013. "EU governance and EU funds - testing the effectiveness of EU funds in a sound macroeconomic framework," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 510, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zaman, Gheorghe & Georgescu, George, 2014. "Absorbţia fondurilor structurale şi de coeziune în Romania: bilanţul perioadei 2007-2013 şi lecţii pentru exerciţiul financiar curent [The absorption of structural and cohesion funds in Romania: ba," MPRA Paper 56144, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Lukasz Pietak, 2021. "Structural Funds and Convergence in Poland," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 236(1), pages 3-37, March.
    3. Valentin Jouvanceau, 2023. "Consumer price rigidity in periods of low and high inflation: the case of Lithuania," Bank of Lithuania Discussion Paper Series 34, Bank of Lithuania.
    4. Jan Fidrmuc & Martin Hulényi & Olga Zajkowska, 2019. "The Elusive Quest for the Holy Grail of an Impact of EU Funds on Regional Growth," CESifo Working Paper Series 7989, CESifo.
    5. Dicharry, Benoit & Nguyen-Van, Phu & Pham, Thi Kim Cuong, 2019. "“The winner takes it all” or a story of the optimal allocation of the European Cohesion Fund," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 385-399.
    6. Atella, Vincenzo & Braione, Manuela & Ferrara, Giancarlo & Resce, Giuliano, 2023. "Cohesion Policy Funds and local government autonomy: Evidence from Italian municipalities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    7. Rumen Dobrinsky & Peter Havlik, 2014. "Economic Convergence and Structural Change: the Role of Transition and EU Accession," wiiw Research Reports 395, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    8. Elzbieta Ociepa-Kicinska & Rafal Czyzycki & Piotr Szklarz & Rafal Kloska, 2021. "Impact of EU Funds on the Level of Regional Socio-Economic Development: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 328-362.
    9. Mariarosaria Comunale & Anh Dinh Minh Nguyen & Soroosh Soofi-Siavash, 2019. "Convergence and growth decomposition: an analysis on Lithuania," Bank of Lithuania Discussion Paper Series 17, Bank of Lithuania.
    10. Mindaugas Butkus & Alma Maciulyte-Sniukiene & Kristina Matuzeviciute, 2020. "Heterogeneous growth outcomes of the EU’s regional financial support mediated by institutions with some empirical evidences at NUTS 3 level," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 40(1), pages 33-66, April.
    11. Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu & Tamara Maria Nae & Margareta-Stela Florescu, 2024. "From Policy to Impact: Advancing Economic Development and Tackling Social Inequities in Central and Eastern Europe," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Dimitar Hadjinikolov, 2017. "Bulgaria in the EU Cohesion Process," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 213-225, June.
    13. Francesca D'Auria & Andrea Pagano & Marco Ratto & Janos Varga, 2009. "A comparison of structural reform scenarios across the EU member states - Simulation-based analysis using the QUEST model with endogenous growth," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 392, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    14. POP Andrada, 2020. "Eu Funding €“ A Positive Impact On Gdp?," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 89-98, July.
    15. Roman Römisch, 2020. "Estimating Demand Spillovers of EU Cohesion Policy Using European Regional Input-Output Tables," wiiw Working Papers 184, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    16. Benoit Dicharry & Nguyen-Van Phu & Thi Kim Cuong Pham, 2019. "La politique de cohésion de l’UE et la convergence économique," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 41(1), pages 5-11, December.
    17. Zsolt Darvas & Guntram B. Wolff, 2018. "The EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework and some implications for CESEE countries," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3-18, pages 77-86.
    18. Benoit Dicharry & Nguyen-Van Phu & Thi Kim Cuong Pham, 2019. "La politique de cohésion de l’UE et la convergence économique," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 41(1), pages 5-11, November.
    19. Belke, Ansgar & Haskamp, Ulrich & Setzer, Ralph, 2016. "Regional bank efficiency and its effect on regional growth in “normal” and “bad” times," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 413-426.
    20. DOBRE, Alin Stelian, 2015. "Public Revenues And Social Polarization In Romania," Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 19(2), pages 92-103.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Structural; Cohesion; funds; contracting; payment; certification;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:742-748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.