IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/untern/10.5771-0042-059x-2015-1-54.html

Gesetzmäßigkeiten in der Unternehmensführung? – Unternehmensführung als das Verfügen über Notwendigkeiten

Author

Listed:
  • van Aaken, Dominik
  • Kirsch, Werner
  • Seidl, David

Abstract

Taking the debate on evidence-based management and success-factor research as a point of departure, this paper discusses three different views of the role of identified regularities for management practice: (1) acceptance of regularities, where regularities are understood as delimiting the scope of action, (2) use of regularities, where regularities are understood as restrictions that change over time and (3) management of regularities, where regularities are understood as temporary invariances that can be managed by the firm. Reflecting on the scientific status of regularities in the social sciences, we argue that the first two views are based on a limited understanding of the nature of management sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • van Aaken, Dominik & Kirsch, Werner & Seidl, David, 2015. "Gesetzmäßigkeiten in der Unternehmensführung? – Unternehmensführung als das Verfügen über Notwendigkeiten," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(1), pages 54-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2015-1-54
    DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2015-1-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0042-059X-2015-1-54
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0042-059X-2015-1-54?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryals, Lynette & Knox, Simon, 2001. "Cross-functional issues in the implementation of relationship marketing through customer relationship management," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 534-542, October.
    2. Reto Cueni & Bruno S. Frey, 2014. "Forecasts and Reactivity," CREMA Working Paper Series 2014-10, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    3. Neal S Young & John P A Ioannidis & Omar Al-Ubaydli, 2008. "Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-5, October.
    4. Olaf Helmer & Nicholas Rescher, 1959. "On the Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 25-52, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Julmi, 2020. "„Nun sag, wie hast du’s mit den Geisteswissenschaften?“ Ein Review wissenschaftstheoretischer Grundlagen deutschsprachiger Lehrbücher der Allgemeinen Betriebswirtschaftslehre [“Tell me now, how do you feel about the humanities?” A review of the me," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 95-120, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Obsa Urgessa Ayana & Jima Degaga, 2022. "Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: a meta-regression analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 209-261, June.
    2. Villarreal Larrinaga, Oskar, 2016. "Is it desirable, necessary and possible to perform research using case studies?," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    3. Akash Malhotra, 2018. "A hybrid econometric-machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: Prioritizing food policy," Papers 1806.04517, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    4. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John List & Claire Mackevicius & Min Sok Lee & Dana Suskind, 2019. "How Can Experiments Play a Greater Role in Public Policy? 12 Proposals from an Economic Model of Scaling," Artefactual Field Experiments 00679, The Field Experiments Website.
    5. Francis Rousseaux & Pierre Saurel & Jean Petit, 2014. "Knowledge Engineering or Digital Humanities? Territorial Intelligence, a Case in Point," Post-Print hal-01084712, HAL.
    6. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John A. List, 2015. "Do Natural Field Experiments Afford Researchers More or Less Control than Laboratory Experiments? A Simple Model," NBER Working Papers 20877, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Kahn, Kenneth B. & Reizenstein, Richard C. & Rentz, Joseph O., 2004. "Sales-distribution interfunctional climate and relationship effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(10), pages 1085-1091, October.
    8. Kirmayer, Laurence J., 2012. "Cultural competence and evidence-based practice in mental health: Epistemic communities and the politics of pluralism," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 249-256.
    9. Garrido-Moreno, Aurora & Padilla-Meléndez, Antonio, 2011. "Analyzing the impact of knowledge management on CRM success: The mediating effects of organizational factors," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 437-444.
    10. Carmen-Maria, IORDACHE & Alexandrina, SÎRBU, 2013. "Customer Loyalty - The Guaranteed Success Of An Organization On The Market," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 22(4), pages 41-48.
    11. Daniele Fanelli, 2012. "Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(3), pages 891-904, March.
    12. Zuzana Irsova & Hristos Doucouliagos & Tomas Havranek & T. D. Stanley, 2024. "Meta‐analysis of social science research: A practitioner's guide," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1547-1566, December.
    13. Manuela, Presutti & Cristina, Boari & Molina-Morales, Francesco Xavier, 2021. "I need you, but do I love you? Strong ties and innovation in supplier–customer relations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 790-801.
    14. Chi, Nguyen Thi Khanh, 2021. "Innovation capability: The impact of e-CRM and COVID-19 risk perception," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Eleanna Kafeza & Christos Makris & Gerasimos Rompolas & Feras Al-Obeidat, 0. "Behavioral and Migration Analysis of the Dynamic Customer Relationships on Twitter," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    16. Waseem John, 2019. "Scale Development and Construct Validity of Organizational Capital in Customer Relationship Management Context: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 7(1), pages 76-91, January.
    17. Hoi K. Suen, 1984. "A Procedure for the Derivation of the Best Estimate When Empirical Data Are Unattainable," Evaluation Review, , vol. 8(5), pages 734-743, October.
    18. Chris Doucouliagos & T.D. Stanley, 2013. "Are All Economic Facts Greatly Exaggerated? Theory Competition And Selectivity," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 316-339, April.
    19. Chun-Chu Liu & Li-min Chuang & Chien-Min Huang, 2012. "A Study of the Impact of the e-CRM Perspective on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty-Exemplified by Bank Sinopac," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 4(8), pages 467-476.
    20. Masood Fooladi Chaghadari Author_Email: foladim57@gmail.com & Zaleha Abdul Shukor, 2011. "Corporate Governance And Disclosure Of Related Party Transactions," 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding 2011-267, Conference Master Resources.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2015-1-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.