IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2025i69p207-231.html

Does theory influence policy? A quantitative analysis of interrelationship between academic discourse and economic policy in international trade

Author

Listed:
  • Galeev, A.

    (HSE University, Moscow, Russia)

  • Galeeva, E.

    (Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, Moscow, Russia
    Russian Foreign Trade Academy, Moscow, Russia)

  • Zhokhov, M.

    (HSE University, Moscow, Russia
    Barcelona School of Economics, Spain)

Abstract

This paper addresses the mutual influence between economic theory and policy in international trade employing interdisciplinary methodology, integrating Natural Language Processing (NLP) and econometric analysis. We test whether the relationship between economic theory and economic policy can be characterised by either "economics as art" approach (where theory serves the role of an auxiliary tool to the policy) or by "scientistic" approach (where economic policy is interpreted as the practical application of theory). We firstly characterise the academic discourse in terms of adherence to either protectionism or economic liberalism with NLP algorithms. Our analysis reveals the formation of a dominant liberal consensus in academia regardless of journal quality adjustments. Secondly, we estimate Vector Autoregression (VAR) and Vector Error Correction (VEC) models to analyse the dynamic relationship between academic discourse, trade policies, and economic activity (measured by trade volume). At the global level, we identify a complex, bidirectional relationship: academic discourse helps predict policy and trade in the short-run, while in the long-run, policy and economic activity help predict the discourse. This refutes the "scientistic" interpretation of direct theoretical influence in favour of "economics as art" approach. Similar analysis of Russian data provides deeper understanding of the relationship between theory and policy at the country level. On the one hand, Russian academic discourse aligns with global liberal trends and tends to study the economic environment rather than have a direct influence on it. On the other hand, Russian policy-makers are driven by distinct political objectives, pursuing protectionist policies despite a more liberal global academic discourse. These results indicate the absence of the "scientistic" approach in Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Galeev, A. & Galeeva, E. & Zhokhov, M., 2025. "Does theory influence policy? A quantitative analysis of interrelationship between academic discourse and economic policy in international trade," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 207-231.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2025:i:69:p:207-231
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2025_4_207-231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2025-69-207-231r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2025_4_207-231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denis V. Melnik & Mikhail I. Miryakov, 2019. "Privatization of pension system in Chile and formation of new pension orthodoxy," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 9.
    2. Donald Mackenzie & Fabian Muniesa & Lucia Siu, 2007. "Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics," Post-Print halshs-00149145, HAL.
    3. Baltagi, Badi H. & Demetriades, Panicos O. & Law, Siong Hook, 2009. "Financial development and openness: Evidence from panel data," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 285-296, July.
    4. repec:nos:voprec:y:2016:id:257 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    6. Maltsev, Alexander A. (Мальцев, Александр), 2018. "Heterodox Economic Theory: Current Status and Ways of Further Development [Гетеродоксальная Экономическая Теория: Текущее Состояние И Пути Дальнейшего Развития]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 148-169, April.
    7. Donald MacKenzie & Fabian Muniesa & Lucia Siu, 2007. "Introduction to Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics," Introductory Chapters, in: Donald MacKenzie & Fabian Muniesa & Lucia Siu (ed.),Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, Princeton University Press.
    8. Mariusz Maziarz, 2015. "A review of the Granger-causality fallacy," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 8(2), May.
    9. A. Maltsev., 2016. "Russian community of economists: Main features and perspectives," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 11.
    10. Lino Wehrheim, 2019. "Economic history goes digital: topic modeling the Journal of Economic History," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 13(1), pages 83-125, January.
    11. Peter C. B. Phillips, 2003. "Laws and Limits of Econometrics," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(486), pages 26-52, March.
    12. Mark K. McBeth & Robert J. Tokle & Susan Schaefer, 2018. "Media Narratives Versus Evidence in Economic Policy Making: The 2008–2009 Financial Crisis," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(2), pages 791-806, June.
    13. Lino Wehrheim, 2019. "Economic history goes digital: topic modeling the Journal of Economic History," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 13(1), pages 83-125, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lilian Muchimba & Alexis Stenfors, 2021. "Beyond LIBOR: Money Markets and the Illusion of Representativeness," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 565-573, April.
    2. Leon Wansleben, 2013. "Dreaming with BRICs," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 453-471, November.
    3. Loconto, Allison & Rajão, Raoni, 2020. "Governing by models: Exploring the technopolitics of the (in)visilibities of land," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Aleksandra Kuzior & Aleksy Kwilinski & Ihor Hroznyi, 2021. "The Factorial-Reflexive Approach to Diagnosing the Executors’ and Contractors’ Attitude to Achieving the Objectives by Energy Supplying Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Sabine Carton & Carine Dominguez-Perry & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2012. "Performativity and Information Technologies: An inter-organizational perspective," Post-Print halshs-00851315, HAL.
    6. Franck Cochoy & Martin Giraudeau & Liz McFall, 2010. "Performativity, Economics And Politics," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 139-146, July.
    7. Heidi Østbø Haugen, 2018. "The unmaking of a commodity: Intermediation and the entanglement of power cables in Nigeria," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1295-1313, September.
    8. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2023. "A one-hundred-year structural topic modeling analysis of the knowledge structure of international management research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3905-3935, August.
    9. Benjamin Braun, 2016. "From performativity to political economy: index investing, ETFs and asset manager capitalism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 257-273, May.
    10. Kristin Asdal & Béatrice Cointe, 2022. "Writing good economics: how texts 'on the move' perform the lab and discipline of experimental economics," Post-Print hal-03429169, HAL.
    11. Kristin Asdal & Béatrice Cointe, 2021. "Experiments in co-modification: a relational take on the becoming of commodities and the making of market value," Post-Print hal-03168937, HAL.
    12. Claude Diebolt & Michael Haupert, 2021. "The Role of Cliometrics in History and Economics," Working Papers of BETA 2021-26, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    13. Miguel Poiares Maduro & Giulio Pasi & Gianluca Misuraca, 2018. "Social Impact Investment in the EU. Financing strategies and outcome oriented approaches for social policy innovation: narratives, experiences, and recommendations," JRC Research Reports JRC111373, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Levy, Daniel & Mayer, Tamir & Raviv, Alon, 2022. "Economists in the 2008 financial crisis: Slow to see, fast to act," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Tommaso Pardi, 2019. "Fourth industrial revolution concepts in the automotive sector: performativity, work and employment," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(3), pages 379-389, September.
    16. Taylor C. Nelms, 2012. "The Zombie Bank And The Magic Of Finance," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 231-246, May.
    17. Patrick J. L. Cockburn, 2014. "Street Papers, Work and Begging: 'Experimenting' at the Margins of Economic Legitimacy," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 145-160, May.
    18. Claude Diebolt & Michael Haupert, 2020. "How Cliometrics has Infiltrated Economics – and Helped to Improve the Discipline," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 54(1), pages 219-230, June.
    19. De Brabandere, L. & Schuurmans, J. & van der Woerd, O. & Bal, R. & Wallenburg, I., 2025. "Targeting ‘average Jane’: The co-modification of for-profit nursing home care in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 387(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B27 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - International Trade and Finance
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2025:i:69:p:207-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.