IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v387y2025ics0277953625010433.html

Targeting ‘average Jane’: The co-modification of for-profit nursing home care in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • De Brabandere, L.
  • Schuurmans, J.
  • van der Woerd, O.
  • Bal, R.
  • Wallenburg, I.

Abstract

In the Global North, long-term residential care is increasingly shaped by globally financed, for-profit nursing home chains. Yet little is known about how such initiatives operate and how they interact with public healthcare systems. This article investigates a long-term care facility in the Netherlands backed by global investment capital. Drawing on the concept of co-modification (Asdal & Huse, 2023), defined as the co-creation of goods and services alongside markets and regulatory frameworks, we examine how actors across different layers of the healthcare system collaboratively transform care into a profitable product. Based on ethnographic observations, interviews with care providers and policymakers, and analysis of policy documents, we identify four interconnected practices through which co-modification unfolds: 1) articulating user value, 2) delineating a customer niche, 3) making products by standardizing, and 4) claiming space trough legitimacy work and strategic positioning in a health care system. We show how in this process globally financed care providers become increasingly entangled with regular care providers and reshape the healthcare system. In doing so, we extend the concept of co-modification to public healthcare systems under institutional constraints, show what work is needed in such circumstances, and introduce market segmentation as a co-productive mechanism linking valuation practices to the configuration of consumer populations.

Suggested Citation

  • De Brabandere, L. & Schuurmans, J. & van der Woerd, O. & Bal, R. & Wallenburg, I., 2025. "Targeting ‘average Jane’: The co-modification of for-profit nursing home care in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 387(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:387:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625010433
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625010433
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald Mackenzie & Fabian Muniesa & Lucia Siu, 2007. "Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics," Post-Print halshs-00149145, HAL.
    2. Martin Kornberger, 2017. "The Values of Strategy : Valuation Practices, Rivalry and Strategic Agency," Post-Print hal-02311977, HAL.
    3. Waring, Justin & Bishop, Simon, 2013. "McDonaldization or Commercial Re-stratification: Corporatization and the multimodal organisation of English doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 147-155.
    4. Donald MacKenzie & Fabian Muniesa & Lucia Siu, 2007. "Introduction to Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics," Introductory Chapters, in: Donald MacKenzie & Fabian Muniesa & Lucia Siu (ed.),Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, Princeton University Press.
    5. Olivier Jacques & Alain Noël, 2022. "Welfare state decommodification and population health," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Timmermans, Stefan & Almeling, Rene, 2009. "Objectification, standardization, and commodification in health care: A conceptual readjustment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 21-27, July.
    7. Kate Bayliss, 2016. "The Financialisation of Health in England and Wales; Lessons from the Water Sector," Working papers wpaper131, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    8. Atul Gupta & Sabrina T Howell & Constantine Yannelis & Abhinav Gupta, 2024. "Owner Incentives and Performance in Healthcare: Private Equity Investment in Nursing Homes," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 37(4), pages 1029-1077.
    9. Węgrzynowska, Maria & Nenko, Ilona & Raczkiewicz, Dorota & Baranowska, Barbara, 2023. "Investment in the peace of mind? How private services change the landscape of maternity care in Poland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    10. Eileen Appelbaum & Rosemary Batt, 2020. "Private Equity Buyouts in Healthcare: Who Wins, Who Loses?," Working Papers Series 118, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    11. Catherine Grandclément & Franck Cochoy, 2006. "Histoires du chariot de supermarché. Ou comment emboîter le pas de la consommation de masse," Post-Print halshs-00166104, HAL.
    12. Claes-Fredrik Helgesson & Fabian Muniesa, 2013. "For What It's Worth: An Introduction to Valuation Studies," Post-Print halshs-00817375, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cochrane, David Troy, 2020. "Disobedient Things: The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Accounting for Disaster," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 3-32.
    2. Lilian Muchimba & Alexis Stenfors, 2021. "Beyond LIBOR: Money Markets and the Illusion of Representativeness," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 565-573, April.
    3. Leon Wansleben, 2013. "Dreaming with BRICs," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 453-471, November.
    4. Loconto, Allison & Rajão, Raoni, 2020. "Governing by models: Exploring the technopolitics of the (in)visilibities of land," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Aleksandra Kuzior & Aleksy Kwilinski & Ihor Hroznyi, 2021. "The Factorial-Reflexive Approach to Diagnosing the Executors’ and Contractors’ Attitude to Achieving the Objectives by Energy Supplying Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    6. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Sabine Carton & Carine Dominguez-Perry & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2012. "Performativity and Information Technologies: An inter-organizational perspective," Post-Print halshs-00851315, HAL.
    7. Galeev, A. & Galeeva, E. & Zhokhov, M., 2025. "Does theory influence policy? A quantitative analysis of interrelationship between academic discourse and economic policy in international trade," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 207-231.
    8. Franck Cochoy & Martin Giraudeau & Liz McFall, 2010. "Performativity, Economics And Politics," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 139-146, July.
    9. Heidi Østbø Haugen, 2018. "The unmaking of a commodity: Intermediation and the entanglement of power cables in Nigeria," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1295-1313, September.
    10. Benjamin Braun, 2016. "From performativity to political economy: index investing, ETFs and asset manager capitalism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 257-273, May.
    11. Kristin Asdal & Béatrice Cointe, 2022. "Writing good economics: how texts 'on the move' perform the lab and discipline of experimental economics," Post-Print hal-03429169, HAL.
    12. Kristin Asdal & Béatrice Cointe, 2021. "Experiments in co-modification: a relational take on the becoming of commodities and the making of market value," Post-Print hal-03168937, HAL.
    13. Miguel Poiares Maduro & Giulio Pasi & Gianluca Misuraca, 2018. "Social Impact Investment in the EU. Financing strategies and outcome oriented approaches for social policy innovation: narratives, experiences, and recommendations," JRC Research Reports JRC111373, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Tommaso Pardi, 2019. "Fourth industrial revolution concepts in the automotive sector: performativity, work and employment," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(3), pages 379-389, September.
    15. Taylor C. Nelms, 2012. "The Zombie Bank And The Magic Of Finance," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 231-246, May.
    16. Patrick J. L. Cockburn, 2014. "Street Papers, Work and Begging: 'Experimenting' at the Margins of Economic Legitimacy," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 145-160, May.
    17. Sven Modell, 2014. "The societal relevance of management accounting: An introduction to the special issue," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 83-103, April.
    18. Faulconbridge, James R. & Muzio, Daniel, 2021. "Valuation devices and the dynamic legitimacy-performativity nexus: The case of PEP in the English legal profession," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Shaozeng Zhang, 2017. "From externality in economics to leakage in carbon markets: An anthropological approach to market making," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 132-143, January.
    20. Katharine Tröger & Margareta Amy Lelea & Brigitte Kaufmann, 2018. "The Fine Line between Trusting and Cheating: Exploring Relationships between Actors in Ugandan Pineapple Value Chains," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(5), pages 823-841, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:387:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625010433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.