IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/thk/wpaper/118.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Private Equity Buyouts in Healthcare: Who Wins, Who Loses?

Author

Listed:
  • Eileen Appelbaum

    (Center for Economic and Policy Research)

  • Rosemary Batt

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

Private equity firms have become major players in the healthcare industry. How has this happened and what are the results? What is private equity’s ‘value proposition’ to the industry and to the American people -- at a time when healthcare is under constant pressure to cut costs and prices? How can PE firms use their classic leveraged buyout model to ‘save healthcare’ while delivering ‘outsized returns’ to investors? In this paper, we bring together a wide range of sources and empirical evidence to answer these questions. Given the complexity of the sector, we focus on four segments where private equity firms have been particularly active: hospitals, outpatient care (urgent care and ambulatory surgery centers), physician staffing and emergency room services (surprise medical billing), and revenue cycle management (medical debt collecting). In each of these segments, private equity has taken the lead in consolidating small providers, loading them with debt, and rolling them up into large powerhouses with substantial market power before exiting with handsome returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Eileen Appelbaum & Rosemary Batt, 2020. "Private Equity Buyouts in Healthcare: Who Wins, Who Loses?," Working Papers Series 118, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
  • Handle: RePEc:thk:wpaper:118
    DOI: 10.36687/inetwp118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36687/inetwp118
    File Function: First version, 2020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36687/inetwp118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Estache & Ardit Litaj, 2023. "Is Private Equity Good for Health? Regulation and Competition Policy Lessons from a Survey of the Evidence," Working Papers ECARES 2023-01, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Tim N. Nolte & Felix Miedaner & Sandra Sülz, 2022. "Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Private Equity Transactions in Outpatient Health Care—A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Atul Gupta & Sabrina T Howell & Constantine Yannelis & Abhinav Gupta, 2021. "Does Private Equity Investment in Healthcare Benefit Patients? Evidence from Nursing Homes," Working Papers 2021-20, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    4. Neely, Megan Tobias & Carmichael, Donna, 2021. "Profiting on crisis: how predatory financial investors have worsened inequality in the coronavirus crisis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112697, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Private Equity; Leveraged Buyouts; health care industry; financial engineering; surprise medical billing revenue cycle management; urgent care; ambulatory care.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:thk:wpaper:118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pia Malaney (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inetnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.