IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nbb/ecrart/y2016mseptemberiiip63-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to stimulate entrepreneurship in Belgium ?

Author

Listed:
  • J. De Mulder

    (National Bank of Belgium)

  • H. Godefroid

    (National Bank of Belgium)

Abstract

While the creation of businesses is very important for economic growth, Belgium’s performance in that regard has been below the EU15 average for many years. The same can be said of the percentage of self-employed workers in the population of working age. As well as establishing that fact, this article tries to identify some of the reasons behind it. Being multidimensional in character, entrepreneurship is influenced by numerous factors. They are grouped into five main categories. Belgium does fairly well in regard to market conditions, and is average in terms of the regulatory framework, access to finance, and entrepreneurial capabilities. However, in regard to its entrepreneurship culture, Belgium was at the bottom of the EU15 ranking between 2009 and 2015. That therefore appears to be one of the main factors explaining Belgium’s poor performance in regard to setting up new businesses. Consequently, it is vital to promote a positive view of entrepreneurship, helping to reduce the fear of failure and the associated stigma, and to encourage creativity and risk-taking. Stimulating the entrepreneurial culture requires an approach based on multiple channels, including schools and the media. Such a change of culture could make a significant contribution towards preserving and enhancing the future prosperity of Belgium.

Suggested Citation

  • J. De Mulder & H. Godefroid, 2016. "How to stimulate entrepreneurship in Belgium ?," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue ii, pages 63-80, september.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2016:m:september:i:ii:p:63-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nbb.be/en/articles/how-stimulate-entrepreneurship-belgium
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoltan Acs, 2008. "How is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth?," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 21, pages 291-301, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Alexander Kritikos, 2014. "Entrepreneurs and their impact on jobs and economic growth," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 1-8, May.
    3. repec:iza:izawol:journl:y:2014:p:8 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. De Mulder & H. Godefroid & C. Swartenbroekx, 2017. "Up or out ? Portrait of young high?growth firms in Belgium," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue iii, pages 93-113, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nyoni, Thabani, 2018. "Switching from Job Seekers to Job Creators: Transmogrifying Necessity Entrepreneurs and Ratifying Opportunity Entrepreneurs in Zimbabwe," MPRA Paper 88840, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Konon, Alexander & Fritsch, Michael & Kritikos, Alexander S., 2018. "Business cycles and start-ups across industries: An empirical analysis of German regions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 742-761.
    3. Oasis Kodila-Tedika & Julius Agbor, 2016. "Does Trust Matter for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from a Cross-Section of Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Heira Georgina Valdez-Bocanegra & Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán & Carmen Castrejón-Mata, 2020. "The Entrepreneurial Orientation and its Impact on Competitiveness and Growth: Empirical Evidence in the State of Aguascalientes in Mexico," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 1-6.
    5. Bhuiyan, Muhammad Faress & Ivlevs, Artjoms, 2019. "Micro-entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Evidence from rural Bangladesh," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 625-645.
    6. Fabiola Baltar & Sonia de Coulon, 2014. "Dynamics Of The Entrepreneurial Process: The Innovative Entrepreneur And The Strategic Decisions," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 69-81.
    7. Daniel Alonso-Martínez & Nuria González-Álvarez & Mariano Nieto, 2021. "Does international patent collaboration have an effect on entrepreneurship?," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 539-559, December.
    8. Adebiyi Julius Abosede & Adegbemi Babatunde Onakoya, 2013. "Intellectual Entrepreneurship: Theories, Purpose and Challenges," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(5), pages 30-37, September.
    9. Erika Urbankova & David Krizek, 2020. "Homogeneity of Determinants in the Financial Sector and Investment in EU Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, February.
    10. repec:thr:techub:10011:y:2020:i:1:p:339-354 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Aga,Gemechu A. & Campos,Francisco Moraes Leitao & Conconi,Adriana & Davies,Elwyn Adriaan Robin & Geginat,Carolin, 2021. "Informal Firms in Mozambique : Status and Potential," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9712, The World Bank.
    12. Niklas Elert, 2014. "What determines entry? Evidence from Sweden," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(1), pages 55-92, August.
    13. Kim, Jungsuk & Castillejos-Petalcorin, Cynthia & Jinjarak, Yothin & Park, Donghyun & Quising, Pilipinas & Tian, Shu, 2022. "Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Perspective," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 672, Asian Development Bank.
    14. Anita Wölfl, 2021. "Coronavirus – Crisis or Opportunity for Start-Ups?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 74(01), pages 62-65, January.
    15. Rodrigues Brás Gonçalo & Soukiazis Elias, 2019. "The Determinants of Entrepreneurship at the Country Level: A Panel Data Approach," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Wim Naudé, 2007. "Peace, Prosperity, and Pro-Growth Entrepreneurship," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2007-02, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Kunwon Ahn & John V. Winters, 2023. "Does education enhance entrepreneurship?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 717-743, August.
    18. Nestor Gandelam & Virginia Robano, 2014. "Intergenerational Mobility and Entrepreneurship in Uruguay," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 51(2), pages 195-226, November.
    19. de Coulon, Sonia, 2013. "La dinámica del proceso emprendedor: análisis biográfico del emprendedor innovador a través de sus decisiones estratégicas," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1871, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    20. Ioannis Sitaridis & Fotis Kitsios, 2020. "Competitiveness analysis and evaluation of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a multi-criteria approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 377-399, November.
    21. Kritikos, Alexander, 2022. "Personality and Entrepreneurship," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1137, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entrepreneurship; determinants; entrepreneurial culture;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2016:m:september:i:ii:p:63-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bnbgvbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.