IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nax/conyad/v62y2017i3p810-826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corrupción como proceso organizacional: comprendiendo la lógica de la desnormalización de la corrupción

Author

Listed:
  • David Arellano Gault

    (Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, México)

Abstract

El artículo cuestiona los supuestos de la visión individualista de la corrupción y se introduce al contrario una conceptualización más «densa socialmente»: el proceso de normalización de la corrupción. En esta última lógica, se advierte que una definición de corrupción es siempre una definición política e ideológica que intenta imponer una visión determinada de comportamientos «adecuados» de acuerdo a una separación pretendidamente tajante y clara entre las esferas de lo público y lo privado. Se realiza una revisión de parte de la literatura sobre corrupción organizacional, con el fin de comprender cómo las rutinas, procesos y estructuras de socialización propias de la arena organizacional pueden llevar justamente a las personas a «caer en resbaladilla» hacia una dinámica de corrupción. A normalizarla en otras palabras. Se concluye con un llamado a discutir los procesos de desnormalización de la corrupción, como estrategia sustantiva más allá de la visión individualista o moralista del fenómeno.

Suggested Citation

  • David Arellano Gault, 2017. "Corrupción como proceso organizacional: comprendiendo la lógica de la desnormalización de la corrupción," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 810-826, Julio-Sep.
    • Handle: RePEc:nax:conyad:v:62:y:2017:i:3:p:810-826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cya.unam.mx/index.php/cya/article/view/975
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Philp, 1997. "Defining Political Corruption," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 45(3), pages 436-462, August.
    2. Sissener, T.K., 2001. "Anthropological Perspectives on Corruption," Papers 2001:5, Universitat Zurich - Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Institut.
    3. Peter Fleming & Stelios C. Zyglidopoulos, 2009. "Charting Corporate Corruption," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12882.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Moreno‐Jaimes, 2022. "Indulgent citizens: Bribery in Mexico's bureaucratic procedures," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 190-208, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Arellano Gault, 2017. "Corruption as an organizational process: Understanding the logic of the denormalization of corruption," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 827-842, Julio-Sep.
    2. Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel & Luís de Sousa, 2018. "Legal Corruption and Dissatisfaction with Democracy in the European Union," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 653-674, November.
    3. Roberts, John, 2015. "The ‘subject’ of corruption," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 82-88.
    4. Elena de la Poza & Lucas Jódar & Paloma Merello, 2021. "Modeling Political Corruption in Spain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Vasylyeva, Anna & Merkle, Ortrun, 2018. "Combatting corruption in higher education in Ukraine," MERIT Working Papers 2018-021, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Atindra Dahal, 2018. "An Appalling Scenario Growing Corruption and Its Obnoxious Impacts on Public Lives -With Special Reference of South-Asian Stigma," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 74-85, May.
    7. Everett, Jeff & Neu, Dean & Rahaman, Abu Shiraz, 2007. "Accounting and the global fight against corruption," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 513-542, August.
    8. Joanna Dzionek-Kozlowska, 2014. "Political Corruption and Electoral Systems Seen with Economists’ Lenses," Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, vol. 17(4), pages 79-92, December.
    9. Oskar Kurer, 2005. "Corruption: An Alternative Approach to Its Definition and Measurement," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(1), pages 222-239, March.
    10. Gephart, Malte, 2013. "Convergence, Divergence and a Complex Interplay: Chile and the International and Transnational Anti-Corruption Campaign," GIGA Working Papers 224, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    11. Seraphim Voliotis, 2017. "Establishing the Normative Standards that Determine Deviance in Organizational Corruption: Is Corruption Within Organizations Antisocial or Unethical?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 147-160, January.
    12. Gruss, Laura & Piotti, Geny, 2010. "Blurring the lines: Strategic deception and self-deception in markets," MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    13. Heather Marquette, 2004. "The Creeping Politicisation of the World Bank: The Case of Corruption," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(3), pages 413-430, October.
    14. Prof. Thomas Kaydor, Jr., 2022. "The Role of the International Criminal Court in Liberia’s Peace and Stability," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(7), pages 562-575, July.
    15. Kanti Pertiwi, 2018. "Contextualizing Corruption: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Studying Corruption in Organizations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Staffan Andersson & Paul M. Heywood, 2009. "The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International's Approach to Measuring Corruption," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(4), pages 746-767, December.
    17. Colin C. Williams & Alvaro Martinez-Perez, 2016. "Evaluating the impacts of corruption on firm performance in developing economies: an institutional perspective," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 401-422.
    18. Stephanos Avakian & Joanne Roberts, 2012. "Whistleblowers in Organisations: Prophets at Work?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 71-84, September.
    19. Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel, 2021. "What We (Don't) Know so Far About Tolerance Towards Corruption in European Democracies: Measurement Approaches, Determinants, and Types," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 1131-1153, October.
    20. Andris Zimelis, 2020. "Corruption research: A need for an integrated approach," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 23(3), pages 288-306, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corrupción; Corrupción organizacional; Socialización; Racionalización; Estrategias contra la corrupción;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nax:conyad:v:62:y:2017:i:3:p:810-826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto García-Narvaez (Technical Editor) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcunamx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.