IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natene/v1y2016i5d10.1038_nenergy.2016.52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large-scale data analysis of power grid resilience across multiple US service regions

Author

Listed:
  • Chuanyi Ji

    (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Yun Wei

    (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Henry Mei

    (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology)

  • Jorge Calzada

    (National Grid)

  • Matthew Carey

    (New York State Public Service Commission)

  • Steve Church

    (New York State Electric and Gas Corporation)

  • Timothy Hayes

    (Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.)

  • Brian Nugent

    (Orange & Rockland Utilities)

  • Gregory Stella

    (New York State Public Service Commission)

  • Matthew Wallace

    (New York State Public Service Commission)

  • Joe White

    (Orange & Rockland Utilities)

  • Robert Wilcox

    (National Grid)

Abstract

Severe weather events frequently result in large-scale power failures, affecting millions of people for extended durations. However, the lack of comprehensive, detailed failure and recovery data has impeded large-scale resilience studies. Here, we analyse data from four major service regions representing Upstate New York during Super Storm Sandy and daily operations. Using non-stationary spatiotemporal random processes that relate infrastructural failures to recoveries and cost, our data analysis shows that local power failures have a disproportionally large non-local impact on people (that is, the top 20% of failures interrupted 84% of services to customers). A large number (89%) of small failures, represented by the bottom 34% of customers and commonplace devices, resulted in 56% of the total cost of 28 million customer interruption hours. Our study shows that extreme weather does not cause, but rather exacerbates, existing vulnerabilities, which are obscured in daily operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuanyi Ji & Yun Wei & Henry Mei & Jorge Calzada & Matthew Carey & Steve Church & Timothy Hayes & Brian Nugent & Gregory Stella & Matthew Wallace & Joe White & Robert Wilcox, 2016. "Large-scale data analysis of power grid resilience across multiple US service regions," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 1-8, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:1:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1038_nenergy.2016.52
    DOI: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nenergy201652
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nenergy.2016.52?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glasmeier, Amy K. & Williams, Darien Alexander, 2022. "Toward a theory of high reliability for natural gas distribution utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Xu, Min & Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony, 2024. "Resilience-driven post-disaster restoration of interdependent infrastructure systems under different decision-making environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Patrick Gasser & Marco Cinelli & Anna Labijak & Matteo Spada & Peter Burgherr & Miłosz Kadziński & Božidar Stojadinović, 2020. "Quantifying Electricity Supply Resilience of Countries with Robust Efficiency Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-35, March.
    4. Tormos-Aponte, Fernando & García-López, Gustavo & Painter, Mary Angelica, 2021. "Energy inequality and clientelism in the wake of disasters: From colorblind to affirmative power restoration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Dunn, Laurel N. & Sohn, Michael D. & LaCommare, Kristina Hamachi & Eto, Joseph H., 2019. "Exploratory analysis of high-resolution power interruption data reveals spatial and temporal heterogeneity in electric grid reliability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 206-214.
    6. Heffron, Raphael J. & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Schöpf, Michael & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2021. "The role of flexibility in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Contributing to a sustainable and resilient energy future in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Kairui Feng & Min Ouyang & Ning Lin, 2022. "Tropical cyclone-blackout-heatwave compound hazard resilience in a changing climate," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Shang, Ce & Lin, Teng & Li, Canbing & Wang, Keyou & Ai, Qian, 2021. "Joining resilience and reliability evaluation against both weather and ageing causes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Hao Wu & Xiangyi Meng & Michael M. Danziger & Sean P. Cornelius & Hui Tian & Albert-László Barabási, 2022. "Fragmentation of outage clusters during the recovery of power distribution grids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    10. Rachunok, Benjamin & Nateghi, Roshanak, 2020. "The sensitivity of electric power infrastructure resilience to the spatial distribution of disaster impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Das, Laya & Munikoti, Sai & Natarajan, Balasubramaniam & Srinivasan, Babji, 2020. "Measuring smart grid resilience: Methods, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Wang, Jing & Zuo, Wangda & Rhode-Barbarigos, Landolf & Lu, Xing & Wang, Jianhui & Lin, Yanling, 2019. "Literature review on modeling and simulation of energy infrastructures from a resilience perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 360-373.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:1:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1038_nenergy.2016.52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.