IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chinese Supervisory Board-An Experiential Case


  • Pao-Chen Lee

    (Department of Accounting, Kainan University, No. 1, Kainan Road, Luzhu Dist., Taoyuan City 33857 Taiwan)


Chinese listed companies adopt first a Supervisory Board (SB) and then the independent directors in a Board of Directors (BoD). Both boards are appointed and report to the shareholders. Specially, the Audit Committee (AC) of BoD and the SB are both in charged with monitoring functions in China. China expects that the establishment of ACs after SBs will improve the internal supervisory mechanism of Corporate Governance. It may present that Chinese SBs have defects in implementation. Particular attention is paid to the difficulties that the SB is facing and to the likely causes to the cooperation with the AC. This paper applied an experiential case study of one listed company in China by interviewing the SB chairman and members with experience. A regulation comparison of the SB powers and duties between German and Chinese governance mechanisms is documented in this article and the issues raised in the interview point out the reasons in implementing ineffective SB through these distinct governance mechanisms. The findings not only listed difficulties in implementing SBs but also the values of keeping SBs in China will be useful for finding ways to improve the effectiveness of the supervisory institutions in China. Results are given there remains a strong need to strengthen the functioning of the SB and cooperation with the AC in the future. This also calls for further endeavors to understand the coordination of the supervisory institutions and functions in the future study.

Suggested Citation

  • Pao-Chen Lee, 2019. "Chinese Supervisory Board-An Experiential Case," Noble International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 4(3), pages 19-33, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nap:nijefr:2019:p:19-33

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Vidhi Chhaochharia & Yaniv Grinstein, 2007. "The Changing Structure of US Corporate Boards: 1997-2003," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 1215-1223, November.
    2. Wen-Wen Chien & Roger W. Mayer & John T. Sennetti, 2010. "Audit Committee Effectiveness In The Largest Us Public Hospitals: An Empirical Study," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 2(1), pages 107-127.
    3. Pieter-Jan Bezemer & Stefan Peij & Gregory Maassen & Han Halder, 2012. "The changing role of the supervisory board chairman: the case of the Netherlands (1997–2007)," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 37-55, February.
    4. Alix Valenti, 2008. "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Has It Brought About Changes in the Boards of Large U. S. Corporations?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 401-412, August.
    5. Xie, Biao & Davidson, Wallace III & DaDalt, Peter J., 2003. "Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 295-316, June.
    6. Gary Gorton & Frank A. Schmid, 2004. "Capital, Labor, and The Firm: A Study of German Codetermination," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 2(5), pages 863-905, September.
    7. David Finegold & George S. Benson & David Hecht, 2007. "Corporate Boards and Company Performance: review of research in light of recent reforms," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 865-878, September.
    8. Firth, Michael & Fung, Peter M.Y. & Rui, Oliver M., 2007. "Ownership, two-tier board structure, and the informativeness of earnings - Evidence from China," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 463-496.
    9. Fairuz Ramli & Anuar Nawawi & Rashid Ameer, 2010. "Director independence and performance of listed companies: evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 280-300.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nap:nijefr:2019:p:19-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Managing Editor). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.