IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr21_02_02.html

Fundamental Corporate Tax Reform: Exploring a New Corporate Tax System with Destination-Based Cash Flow Taxation and Residual Profit Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Bamba Yasuo

    (Chief Analyst, Economic and Fiscal Policy Department, Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting Co.)

Abstract

Efforts have been made to address issues such as tax avoidance and tax competition arising from economic globalization and digitalization, and agreements have been reached on “Pillar I” and “Pillar II” as solutions to tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy, and preparations for their introduction are underway in various countries. Meanwhile, the Destination-Based Cash Flow Taxation (DBCFT) and Residual Profit Allocation by Income (RPAI) plans, etc., have been proposed to fundamentally reform the problems of corporate taxation. Although DBCFT has advantages with regard to efficiency, suppression of tax avoidance, suppression of tax competition, and reduction of tax compliance cost, the deviation from current corporate taxation is significant and there are many issues to be addressed in terms of conforming to the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement and other similar agreements. RPAI does not solve all of the current taxation system’s problems, but it has advantages when considering efficiency, suppression of tax avoidance, and reduction of tax competition, and its deviation from the current corporate taxation system is small.This deviation from the current corporate taxation is not as large as that of the DBCFT. As for the direction of international taxation in the future, drastic corporate tax reform will not be implemented immediately, but rather, practical issues and the resolution status of current corporate taxation issues will be sorted out after first waiting for the introduction and establishment of digital taxation. If drastic corporate tax reform is deemed necessary, the scope of Residual Profit Allocation (RPA) introduction may be expanded in the form of an extension of the Pillar I mechanism, and in the future, the introduction of RPAI could be considered. Subsequently, if further reforms are required, it is assumed that the introduction of DBCFT will be discussed under an international agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Bamba Yasuo, 2025. "Fundamental Corporate Tax Reform: Exploring a New Corporate Tax System with Destination-Based Cash Flow Taxation and Residual Profit Allocation," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 21(2), pages 1-41, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr21_02_02
    DOI: 10.57520/prippr.21-2-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.57520/prippr.21-2-2
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.57520/prippr.21-2-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Beer & Ruud de Mooij & Shafik Hebous & Michael Keen & Li Liu, 2023. "Exploring Residual Profit Allocation," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 70-109, February.
    2. Ruud De Mooij & Li Liu & Dinar Prihardini, 2021. "An Assessment of Global Formula Apportionment," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 431-465.
    3. Devereux, Michael & Bond, Stephen Roy, 2002. "Cash Flow Taxes in an Open Economy," CEPR Discussion Papers 3401, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Itai Grinberg, 2017. "A Destination-Based Cash Flow Tax Can Be Structured to Comply with World Trade Organization Rules," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 70(4), pages 803-818, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garcia-Bernardo, Javier & Janský, Petr, 2024. "Profit shifting of multinational corporations worldwide," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Wolfram F. Richter, 2025. "Correction: Residual profit splitting: a theory-based approach to tax multinationals," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 32(3), pages 918-918, June.
    3. Kempkes, Gerhard & Stähler, Nikolai, 2021. "Re-allocating taxing rights and minimum tax rates in international profit taxation," Discussion Papers 03/2021, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    4. Johannes Becker & Joachim Englisch, 2020. "Unilateral introduction of destination-based cash-flow taxation," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(3), pages 495-513, June.
    5. Fuest, Clemens & Spengel, Christoph & Finke, Katharina & Heckemeyer, Jost H. & Nusser, Hannah, 2013. "Profit shifting and 'aggressive' tax planning by multinational firms: Issues and options for reform," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-078, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Michael P. Devereux, 2008. "Taxation of outbound direct investment: economic principles and tax policy considerations," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 24(4), pages 698-719, winter.
    7. Buiter, Willem H., 2017. "Exchange rate implications of Border Tax Adjustment neutrality," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 11, pages 1-41.
    8. Sijbren Cnossen, 2016. "Tackling Spillovers by Taxing Corporate Income in the European Union at Source," CPB Discussion Paper 324, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    9. Richard Collier & Seppo Kari & Olli Ropponen & Martin Simmler & Maximilian Todtenhaup, 2018. "Dissecting the EU’s Recent Anti-Tax Avoidance Measures: Merits and Problems," EconPol Policy Reports 8, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    10. Hiroshi MUKUNOKI & Hirofumi OKOSHI & Dirk SCHINDLER, 2025. "Reallocating Taxing Rights and Online Trade: Pillar One as a partial formula apportionment," Discussion papers 25032, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    11. Deborah Knirsch & Rainer Niemann, 2008. "Deferred Shareholder Taxation -- Implementing a Neutral Business Tax in the European Union," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 101-125, December.
    12. Wolfram F. Richter, 2022. "Granting Market Countries the Right to Tax Profit without Physical Nexus," CESifo Working Paper Series 9556, CESifo.
    13. Alan J. Auerbach & Michael P. Devereux, 2010. "Consumption and Cash-Flow Taxes in an International Setting," STICERD - Public Economics Programme Discussion Papers 03, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    14. Michael Devereux, 2004. "Debating Proposed Reforms of the Taxation of Corporate Income in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 11(1), pages 71-89, January.
    15. Peter Birch Sørensen, 2006. "Can Capital Income Taxes Survive? And Should They?," EPRU Working Paper Series 06-06, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    16. Alexander Klemm & Ruud De Mooij & Shafik Hebous, 2025. "The Future of Corporate Income Taxation," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 255(4), pages 133-157, December.
    17. Alan Auerbach & Michael P Devereux & Helen Simpson, 2007. "Taxing corporate income," Working Papers 0705, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    18. Małecka-Ziembińska Edyta & Siwiec Anna, 2020. "Searching for similarities in EU corporate income taxes for their harmonization," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(4), pages 72-94, December.
    19. Shafik Hebous & Alexander Klemm, 2020. "A destination-based allowance for corporate equity," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(3), pages 753-777, June.
    20. Devereux, Michael P., 2012. "Issues in the Design of Taxes on Corporate Profit," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 65(3), pages 709-730, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr21_02_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.