IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mir/mirbus/v2y2012i5p113-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of Strategic Philanthropy and CSR Communication Patterns among the World’s Twenty-One Largest Oil Companies

Author

Listed:
  • J. Brad Gatlin

    (Bryan College,Dayton, TN)

Abstract

Fortune Magazine’s 2012 list of 100 largest companies included 21 oil companies. This paper seeks to discern patterns of those 21 companies’ philanthropic efforts and communication thereof. Specifically, the paper will consider issues such as ownership (all companies were either publicly-traded or state-owned), the economic development of the home country, and the citizens’ expectations of corporate citizens. The philanthropic efforts of all 21 companies are discussed in the context of Porter and Kramer’s (2001) framework of the competitive context It is concluded that the oil industry is particularly well-suited to affect factor and, to a lesser extent, demand conditions, through philanthropic efforts. A model for classifying the philanthropic based on ownership and country conditions is proposed, and suggestions for further research are made.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Brad Gatlin, 2012. "An Examination of Strategic Philanthropy and CSR Communication Patterns among the World’s Twenty-One Largest Oil Companies," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 2(5), pages 113-121, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:2:y:2012:i:5:p:113-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/view/103/102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pegg, Scott, 2012. "Social responsibility and resource extraction: Are Chinese oil companies different?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 160-167.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    2. Heloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 753-769, July.
    3. Kimiagari, Salman & Mahbobi, Mohammad & Toolsee, Tushika, 2023. "Attracting and retaining FDI: Africa gas and oil sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Ramírez-Orellana, Alicia & Martínez-Victoria, MCarmen & García-Amate, Antonio & Rojo-Ramírez, Alfonso A., 2023. "Is the corporate financial strategy in the oil and gas sector affected by ESG dimensions?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. E. Shvarts & A. Pakhalov & A. Knizhnikov & L. Ametistova, 2018. "Environmental rating of oil and gas companies in Russia: How assessment affects environmental transparency and performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1023-1038, November.
    6. Melsa Ararat & Asli M. Colpan & Dirk Matten, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Responsibility for the Public Good," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 911-929, December.
    7. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2016. "Sino-Venezuelan oil-for-loan deal – the Chinese strategic gamble?#," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 817-822.
    8. Symeou, Pavlos C. & Zyglidopoulos, Stelios & Williamson, Peter, 2018. "Internationalization as a driver of the corporate social performance of extractive industry firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 27-38.
    9. Botelho, Tatiana & Magrini, Alessandra & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2014. "Plumbing the depths: Utilizing O&G reserve profiles to develop forward-looking risk assessments for exploration and production activities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 489-500.
    10. Bezzola, Selina & Günther, Isabel & Brugger, Fritz & Lefoll, Erwin, 2022. "CSR and local conflicts in African mining communities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Qi Wen & Jin Li & Kevin M. Mwenda & Daniel Ervin & Maya Chatterjee & David Lopez‐Carr, 2022. "Coal exploitation and income inequality: Testing the resource curse with econometric analyses of household survey data from northwestern China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 452-469, March.
    12. Giuseppe Scandurra & Antonio Thomas, 2023. "The SDGs and Non-Financial Disclosures of Energy Companies: The Italian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Ibrahem Alshbili & Ahmed A. Elamer & Maha W. Moustafa, 2021. "Social and environmental reporting, sustainable development and institutional voids: Evidence from a developing country," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 881-895, March.
    14. Wang, Kai-Hua & Xiong, De-Ping & Mirza, Nawazish & Shao, Xue-Feng & Yue, Xiao-Guang, 2021. "Does geopolitical risk uncertainty strengthen or depress cash holdings of oil enterprises? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    15. J. Brad Gatlin, 2012. "An Examination of Strategic Philanthropy and CSR Communication Patterns among the World’s Twenty-One Largest Oil Companies," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(5), pages 113-121, October.
    16. Tang-Lee, Diane, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and public engagement for a Chinese state-backed mining project in Myanmar – Challenges and prospects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 28-37.
    17. Veldhuizen, Caroline & Desouza, Kevin C. & Bandara, Wasana & Chang, Artemis, 2022. "How much is not enough: Corporate social responsibility and beyond in the resources sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Csomós György, 2017. "Cities as command and control centres of the world economy: An empirical analysis, 2006–2015," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 38(38), pages 7-26, December.
    19. Pedersen, Rasmus Hundsbæk & Kweka, Opportuna, 2017. "The political economy of petroleum investments and land acquisition standards in Africa: The case of Tanzania," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 217-225.
    20. Elisa Giuliani & Chiara Macchi, 2014. "Multinational corporations’ economic and human rights impacts on developing countries: a review and research agenda," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(2), pages 479-517.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:2:y:2012:i:5:p:113-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Kabir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csmirus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.