IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgs/ijmsba/v10y2023i1p42-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Effect of Stakeholder Pressures on Safety Risk Adoption: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Mesfin Abeje Tefera

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China, 430070)

  • Fan Luo

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China, 430070)

  • Zeremariam Yosief

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China, 430070)

Abstract

This study investigates the connection between stakeholders and organizational dedication in promoting safety risk practices within large-scale manufacturing enterprises of Chinese origin operating in Ethiopia. Given the complex relationship among evaluation tools, metrics, and stakeholder influence in assessing safety risk practices, a deeper exploration of this relationship becomes vital. The research aims to determine the impact of stakeholder pressure on safety risk practices in the Ethiopian-Chinese manufacturing sector, emphasizing the mediating role of organizational commitment. Provide work for a quantitative research approach, the study focuses on five prominent industrial manufacturing enterprises and employs purposive sampling to select 259 participants. The data analysis employs statistical techniques such as structural equation modeling, growth paths, and correlation matrix using the Smart Pls v. four software suite. The study successfully establishes a causal link between stakeholder pressure and safety risk practices, underscoring the significant influence of stakeholder pressures on managing safety risks. Moreover, organizational commitment emerges as a crucial mediator in this relationship. The findings emphasize the need for policymakers and practitioners in Chinese large-scale manufacturing enterprises in Ethiopia to prioritize enhancing safety practices, leading to improved safety performance and overall safety. This research contributes by addressing the limited understanding of the mediating role of organizational commitment in the framework of stakeholder pressure, safety risk practices, and it supports stakeholder theory. Additionally, it fills the gap in research on safety practices and decision-making in developing nations, specifically focusing on the Ethiopian-Chinese manufacturing sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Mesfin Abeje Tefera & Fan Luo & Zeremariam Yosief, 2023. "Examining the Effect of Stakeholder Pressures on Safety Risk Adoption: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 10(1), pages 42-59, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgs:ijmsba:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:42-59
    DOI: 10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.101.1004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchleap.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/04_Examining-the-effect-of-stakeholder-pressures-on-Safety-Risk-Adoption.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://researchleap.com/examining-the-effect-of-stakeholder-pressures-on-safety-risk-adoption-evidence-from-chinese-manufacturing-enterprises/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.101.1004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abagail McWilliams & Donald Siegel, 2000. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 603-609, May.
    2. Youtang Zhang & Eshetu Yesuf Ayele, 2022. "Factors Affecting Small and Micro Enterprise Performance with the Mediating Effect of Government Support: Evidence from the Amhara Region Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Philip James & David Walters & Helen Sampson & Emma Wadsworth, 2015. "Protecting workers through supply chains: Lessons from two construction case studies," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 36(4), pages 727-747, November.
    4. Zelalem Gebretsadik Estifo & Luo Fan & Naveed Ahmad Faraz, 2019. "Effect of Employee Oriented Human Resource Management Practices on Counterproductive Work Behaviors," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 5(1), pages 23-41, June.
    5. Kamar Zekhnini & Anass Cherrafi & Imane Bouhaddou & Abla Chaouni Benabdellah & Surajit Bag, 2022. "A model integrating lean and green practices for viable, sustainable, and digital supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(21), pages 6529-6555, November.
    6. Harrison, Jeffrey S. & Wicks, Andrew C., 2013. "Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 97-124, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mauro Sciarelli & Mario Tani & Giovanni Landi & Ornella Papaluca, 2019. "The Impact of Social Responsibility Disclosure on Corporate Financial Health: Evidences from Some Italian Public Companies," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 109-122, March.
    2. E.O. Marfo & L. Chen & H. Xuhua & H.A. Antwi & E. Yiranbon, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Driving Dynamics on Firm’s Profitability in Ghana," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 5(3), pages 116-132, July.
    3. Muzhar Javed & Muhammad Amir Rashid & Ghulam Hussain & Hafiz Yasir Ali, 2020. "The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: Moderating role of responsible leadership," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1395-1409, May.
    4. Sergiy D. Dmytriyev & R. Edward Freeman & Jacob Hörisch, 2021. "The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1441-1470, September.
    5. Adewole Olukorede, 2025. "Stakeholder engagement and participation in environmental contexts, social responsibility and society based on a study conducted in Rome, Italy," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-45, December.
    6. Michael S Lin & Yeasun K Chung, 2019. "Understanding the impacts of corporate social responsibility and brand attributes on brand equity in the restaurant industry," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(4), pages 639-658, June.
    7. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    8. Xueyan Dong & Jingyu Gao & Sunny Li Sun & Kangtao Ye, 2021. "Doing extreme by doing good," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 291-315, March.
    9. repec:jpe:journl:1420 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Hua Tang, 2022. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    12. Scholtens, Bert, 2008. "A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 46-55, December.
    13. Omaima A.G. Hassan & Peter Romilly, 2018. "Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 893-909, November.
    14. Dirk Boehe & Luciano Barin Cruz, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 325-346, February.
    15. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    16. Won-Kyu Lim & Cheong-Kyu Park, 2022. "Mandating Gender Diversity and the Value Relevance of Sustainable Development Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Hajar Mouatassim Lahmini & Abdelmajid Ibenrissoul, 2017. "Quel effet de la Responsabilité Sociétale de l'Entreprise sur la performance financière d'un opérateur minier/ Approche par l'Analyse Coûts-Bénéfices," Post-Print hal-01746022, HAL.
    18. Alan Gregory & Julie Whittaker, 2013. "Exploring the Valuation of Corporate Social Responsibility—A Comparison of Research Methods," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Laura Borge & Stefanie Bröring, 2020. "What affects technology transfer in emerging knowledge areas? A multi-stakeholder concept mapping study in the bioeconomy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 430-460, April.
    20. Belen Lopez & Alfonso Torres & Alberto Ruozzi & Jose Antonio Vicente, 2020. "Main Factors for Understanding High Impacts on CSR Dimensions in the Finance Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    21. Md. Rabiul Islam & Syed Zabid Hossain, 2019. "Conceptual mapping of shared value creation by the private commercial banks in Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgs:ijmsba:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:42-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bojan Obrenovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://researchleap.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.