IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Rethinking the Partisan Effects of Higher Turnout: So What's the Question?

Listed author(s):
  • Grofman, Bernard
  • Owen, Guillermo
  • Collet, Christian
Registered author(s):

    Controversy persists over the link between turnout and the likelihood of success of Democratic candidates (e.g., DeNardo, 1980, 1986; Zimmer, 1985; Tucker and Vedlitz, 1986; Piven and Cloward, 1988; Texeira, 1992; Radcliff, 1994, 1995; Erikson, 1995). The authors argue that the participants in this debate have largely been talking past one another because of a failure to distinguish three quite different questions. The first question is:'Are low turnout voters more likely to vote Democratic than high turnout voters?' The second question is: 'Should we expect that elections in which turnout is higher are ones in which we can expect Democrats to have done better?' The third question is the counterfactual: 'If turnout were to have increased in some given election, would Democrats have done better?' The authors show the logical independence of the first two questions from one another and from the third, and argue that previous researchers have failed to recognize this logical independence--sometimes thinking they were answering question three when in fact they were answering either question one or question two. Reviewing previous research, they find that the answer to the first question once was YES but, for more recent elections at the presidential level, now appears to be NO, while, for congressional and legislative elections, the answer to the second question appears generally to be NO. However, the third question is essentially unanswerable absent an explicit model of why and how turnout can be expected to increase, and/or analyses of individual level panel data. Thus, the cross-sectional and pooled data analyses of previous research are of almost no value in addressing this third question. Copyright 1999 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Springer in its journal Public Choice.

    Volume (Year): 99 (1999)
    Issue (Month): 3-4 (June)
    Pages: 357-376

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:99:y:1999:i:3-4:p:357-76
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:99:y:1999:i:3-4:p:357-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)

    or (Rebekah McClure)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.