IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v202y2025i3d10.1007_s11127-024-01225-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The humanomics underpinning free market productivity: synthesizing insights from social philosophy, systems thinking, and neuroeconomics

Author

Listed:
  • Ravi K. Roy

    (W. Edwards Deming Quality Innovation & Leadership Incubator, Southern Utah university)

  • Arthur T. Denzau

    (Claremont Graduate University)

Abstract

Why do free markets at the macroeconomic level perform better than command and control economies over time? Similarly, why do more open, less rigid hierarchal organizational systems at the microeconomic level, generate higher levels of productivity over the long term? Systems thinker Russ Ackhoff asserted that if you want to know how something works, you analyze. However, if you want to know why something works you synthesize. As we shall explore in this paper, Max U-based analyses adopted in traditional neoclassical (Samuelsonian) economics are useful for helping us explain how markets work but not necessarily why. The purpose of this article is: (1) to synthesize insights from humanomics, neuroeconomics, and systems thinking to explore why free markets at the macroeconomic level and more open, less hierarchal organizational systems at the microeconomic level, allow human ingenuity and creativity to flourish and (2) to apply those insights to exploring how we can improve communication and cooperation in boundaryless systems such as the global economy or virtual organizations that operate within it. This article is part of a project that was organized by a group of Public Choice scholars who are committed to the rigorous study of free markets and how their operations might be enhanced at the margin. JEL: A13, B53, D83.

Suggested Citation

  • Ravi K. Roy & Arthur T. Denzau, 2025. "The humanomics underpinning free market productivity: synthesizing insights from social philosophy, systems thinking, and neuroeconomics," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 401-417, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:202:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-024-01225-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11127-024-01225-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11127-024-01225-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11127-024-01225-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Alberto Espinosa & Sandra A. Slaughter & Robert E. Kraut & James D. Herbsleb, 2007. "Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 613-630, August.
    2. Vernon L. Smith, 2020. "Causal versus Consequential Motives in Mental Models of Agent Social and Economic Action: Experiments, and the Neoclassical Diversion in Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 341-370, August.
    3. Arthur T. Denzau & Douglass C. North, 1994. "Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 3-31, February.
    4. Michael C. Munger, 2020. "Ideology and the Direction of Causation in the Acquisition and Maintenance of Shared Belief Systems," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 392-409, August.
    5. Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999. "A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868.
    6. Vernon L. Smith, 1998. "The Two Faces of Adam Smith," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 2-19, July.
    7. Hugo Faria & Hugo Montesinos, 2009. "Does economic freedom cause prosperity? An IV approach," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 103-127, October.
    8. Ravi K. Roy & Arthur T. Denzau, 2020. "Shared Mental Models: Insights and Perspectives on Ideologies and Institutions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 323-340, August.
    9. Gary Charness & Matthew Rabin, 2002. "Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(3), pages 817-869.
    10. Vernon L. Smith, 2003. "Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 465-508, June.
    11. Yehuda Baruch & Chieh-Peng Lin, 2012. "All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance," Post-Print hal-00801978, HAL.
    12. Deirdre Nansen McCloskey, 2016. "“Adam Smith did Humanomics: So Should We”," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 42(4), pages 503-513, September.
    13. Vernon L. Smith, 1998. "The Two Faces of Adam Smith," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 1-19, July.
    14. W. Edwards Deming, 2000. "The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, 2nd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262541165, December.
    15. Arthur T. Denzau & Henrik P. Minassians & Ravi K. Roy, 2016. "Learning to Cooperate: Applying Deming's New Economics and Denzau and North's New Institutional Economics to Improve Interorganizational Systems Thinking," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 471-491, August.
    16. Baruch, Yehuda & Lin, Chieh-Peng, 2012. "All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(6), pages 1155-1168.
    17. Vernon L. Smith, 1998. "The Two Faces of Adam Smith," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 65(1), pages 2-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William F. Shughart II & Ravi K. Roy & Ryan Yonk, 2025. "Humanomics: introduction to a special issue," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 333-339, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcus Shera & Kacey Reeves West, 2024. "Two worlds collide: A review essay of Humanomics: moral sentiments and the wealth of nations for the twenty-first century," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 37(3), pages 333-349, September.
    2. William F. Shughart & Diana W. Thomas & Michael D. Thomas, 2020. "Institutional Change and the Importance of Understanding Shared Mental Models," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 371-391, August.
    3. Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano, 2021. "Microfoundations, behaviour, and evolution: Evidence from experiments," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 372-385.
    4. Brandts, Jordi & Riedl, Arno, 2020. "Market interaction and efficient cooperation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro-Martinez, 2019. "On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 976-1002, March.
    6. Wilson, Bart J., 2008. "Language games of reciprocity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 365-377, November.
    7. Michael C. Munger, 2020. "Ideology and the Direction of Causation in the Acquisition and Maintenance of Shared Belief Systems," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 392-409, August.
    8. Viktor J. Vanberg, 2008. "On the Economics of Moral Preferences," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(4), pages 605-628, October.
    9. Viktor J. Vanberg, 2007. "Rationality, Rule-Following and Emotions: On the Economics of Moral Preferences," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2006-21, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    10. Vernon L. Smith, 2020. "Causal versus Consequential Motives in Mental Models of Agent Social and Economic Action: Experiments, and the Neoclassical Diversion in Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 341-370, August.
    11. Brandts, J. & Riedl, A.M., 2016. "Market competition and efficient cooperation," Research Memorandum 006, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    12. Ravi K. Roy & Arthur T. Denzau, 2020. "Shared Mental Models: Insights and Perspectives on Ideologies and Institutions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 323-340, August.
    13. Amos Witztum, 2016. "Experimental Economics, Game Theory and Das Adam Smith Problem," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 42(4), pages 528-556, September.
    14. Michael C. Munger, 2025. "Are there normative social epistemologies? Vernon Smith, Adam Smith, and the challenge of systems," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 495-507, March.
    15. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Рациональность & Иррациональность: Эволюция Смыслов [Rationality & Irrationality: Evolution of the Senses]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2017:1, Institute of Economics.
    16. Nicholas, Aaron, 2012. "Fairness as a constraint on reciprocity: Playing simultaneously as dictator and trustee," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 211-221.
    17. Michèle Belot & Marcel Fafchamps, 2018. "Are People Equally Other‐Regarding When Selecting a Match Versus Choosing an Allocation?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(4), pages 1088-1108, April.
    18. Cary A. Deck, 2001. "A Test of Game-Theoretic and Behavioral Models of Play in Exchange and Insurance Environments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1546-1555, December.
    19. Michele Belot & Marcel Fafchamps, 2012. "Good Samaritans and the Market: Experimental Evidence on Other-Regarding Preferences," Discussion Papers 2012001, University of Oxford, Nuffield College.
    20. Ricciardi, Francesca & Zardini, Alessandro & Czakon, Wojciech & Rossignoli, Cecilia & Kraus, Sascha, 2022. "Revisiting the cooperation–competition paradox: A configurational approach to short- and long-term coopetition performance in business networks," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 320-331.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Free market; Neo-classical; Humanomics; Global economy; Humanomics; Communication;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • B53 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Austrian
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:202:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-024-01225-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.