IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/netspa/v21y2021i1d10.1007_s11067-021-09520-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Latent Segmentation of Urban Space through Residential Location Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Tomás Cox

    (Universidad de Chile
    Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
    Centro de Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable (CEDEUS))

  • Ricardo Hurtubia

    (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
    Centro de Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable (CEDEUS)
    Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
    Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería (ISCI))

Abstract

Understanding the preferences of households in their location decisions is key for residential demand forecast and urban policy making. Accounting for preference heterogeneity across agents is useful for the modelling process but not enough to completely describe location choice behavior. Due to place-specific conditions, the same agent may have different preferences depending on the sector of the city considered as potential location, a phenomena known as spatial heterogeneity. Segmenting the city by defining zones where agents are supposed to behave similarly has been a common modelling solution, assigning different zonal preference parameters in the estimation process. This has been usually done with two-step methods, where spatial segmentation is done independently of the location choice process, something that could bias estimation results. We propose and test a one-step model for simultaneous estimation of location preference parameters and spatial segmentation, therefore accounting for heterogeneity across agents and space. The model is based on Ellickson’s bid-auction approach for location choice and latent class models. We test our model with a case study in Santiago, Chile and compare it with other models for spatial segmentation. In terms of predictive power, our approach outperforms a model with no zones, a model with zones defined exogenously, and a clustering-based two-step model. This novel approach allows for a better conceptual ground for urban predictive models with spatial segmentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomás Cox & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2021. "Latent Segmentation of Urban Space through Residential Location Choice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 199-228, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:21:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11067-021-09520-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11067-021-09520-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11067-021-09520-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11067-021-09520-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chattopadhyay, Sudip, 1998. "An Empirical Investigation into the Performance of Ellickson's Random Bidding Model, with an Application to Air Quality Valuation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 292-314, March.
    2. Gross, David J. & Sirmans, C. F. & Benjamin, John D., 1990. "An empirical evaluation of the probabilistic bid-rent model : The case of homogenous households," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 103-110, June.
    3. Philip Salesses & Katja Schechtner & César A Hidalgo, 2013. "The Collaborative Image of The City: Mapping the Inequality of Urban Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Mauricio Sarrias, 2019. "Do monetary subjective well-being evaluations vary across space? Comparing continuous and discrete spatial heterogeneity," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 53-87, January.
    5. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
    6. Schnare, Ann B. & Struyk, Raymond J., 1976. "Segmentation in urban housing markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 146-166, April.
    7. Amarin Siripanich & Taha Hossein Rashidi & Emily Moylan, 2019. "Interaction of Public Transport Accessibility and Residential Property Values Using Smart Card Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Ricardo Hurtubia & Michel Bierlaire, 2014. "Estimation of Bid Functions for Location Choice and Price Modeling with a Latent Variable Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    9. Olaru, Doina & Smith, Brett & Taplin, John H.E., 2011. "Residential location and transit-oriented development in a new rail corridor," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 219-237, March.
    10. Rashidi, Taha Hossein & Auld, Joshua & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros), 2012. "A behavioral housing search model: Two-stage hazard-based and multinomial logit approach to choice-set formation and location selection," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1097-1107.
    11. Bourassa, Steven C. & Hamelink, Foort & Hoesli, Martin & MacGregor, Bryan D., 1999. "Defining Housing Submarkets," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 160-183, June.
    12. Goodman, Allen C. & Thibodeau, Thomas G., 1998. "Housing Market Segmentation," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 121-143, June.
    13. Durlauf, Steven N., 2004. "Neighborhood effects," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 50, pages 2173-2242, Elsevier.
    14. Joan Walker & Jieping Li, 2007. "Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 77-101, April.
    15. Lerman, Steven R. & Kern, Clifford R., 1983. "Hedonic theory, bid rents, and willingness-to-pay: Some extensions of Ellickson's results," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 358-363, May.
    16. Muto, Sachio, 2006. "Estimation of the bid rent function with the usage decision model," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 33-49, July.
    17. Dubin, Robin A., 1992. "Spatial autocorrelation and neighborhood quality," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 433-452, September.
    18. Bourassa, Steven C. & Hoesli, Martin & Peng, Vincent S., 2003. "Do housing submarkets really matter?," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 12-28, March.
    19. Jorge Chica Olmo, 1995. "Spatial Estimation of Housing Prices and Locational Rents," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(8), pages 1331-1344, August.
    20. Ettema, Dick, 2010. "The impact of telecommuting on residential relocation and residential preferences: A latent class modelling approach," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 7-24.
    21. Ellickson, Bryan, 1981. "An alternative test of the hedonic theory of housing markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 56-79, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. González-Espejo, Felipe & Astroza, Sebastian & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2022. "On the relation between school and residential location choice: Evidence of heterogeneous strategies from Santiago de Chile," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Tomás Cox & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2022. "Compact development and preferences for social mixing in location choices: Results from revealed preferences in Santiago, Chile," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 246-269, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomás Cox & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2022. "Compact development and preferences for social mixing in location choices: Results from revealed preferences in Santiago, Chile," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 246-269, January.
    2. Ricardo Hurtubia & Michel Bierlaire, 2014. "Estimation of Bid Functions for Location Choice and Price Modeling with a Latent Variable Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    3. Tomás Cox & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2021. "Subdividing the sprawl: Endogenous segmentation of housing submarkets in expansion areas of Santiago, Chile," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 1770-1786, September.
    4. David C. Wheeler & Antonio Páez & Jamie Spinney & Lance A. Waller, 2014. "A Bayesian approach to hedonic price analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 663-683, August.
    5. Antonio Páez & Fei Long & Steven Farber, 2008. "Moving Window Approaches for Hedonic Price Estimation: An Empirical Comparison of Modelling Techniques," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(8), pages 1565-1581, July.
    6. Coën, Alain & Pourcelot, Alexis & Malle, Richard, 2022. "Macroeconomic shocks and ripple effects in the Greater Paris Metropolis," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    7. Palmquist, Raymond B., 2006. "Property Value Models," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 16, pages 763-819, Elsevier.
    8. Bernardo Alves Furtado, 2011. "Neighbourhoods in Urban Economics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(13), pages 2827-2847, October.
    9. Costanigro, Marco & McCluskey, Jill J. & Mittelhammer, Ronald C., 2006. "Identifying submarket in the wine industry: a multivariate approach to hedonic regression," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21370, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Füss, Roland & Koller, Jan A., 2016. "The role of spatial and temporal structure for residential rent predictions," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1352-1368.
    11. Chris Leishman & Greg Costello & Steven Rowley & Craig Watkins, 2013. "The Predictive Performance of Multilevel Models of Housing Sub-markets: A Comparative Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(6), pages 1201-1220, May.
    12. Berna Keskin & Craig Watkins, 2017. "Defining spatial housing submarkets: Exploring the case for expert delineated boundaries," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(6), pages 1446-1462, May.
    13. Yong Tu & Hua Sun & Shi-Ming Yu, 2007. "Spatial Autocorrelations and Urban Housing Market Segmentation," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 385-406, April.
    14. Tom Kauko, 2004. "A Comparative Perspective on Urban Spatial Housing Market Structure: Some More Evidence of Local Sub-markets Based on a Neural Network Classification of Amsterdam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2555-2579, December.
    15. Nishi, Hayato & Asami, Yasushi & Shimizu, Chihiro, 2021. "The illusion of a hedonic price function: Nonparametric interpretable segmentation for hedonic inference," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    16. Jiang, Like & Hagen-Zanker, Alex & Kumar, Prashant & Pritchard, John, 2021. "Equity in job accessibility and environmental quality in a segmented housing market: The case of Greater London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Stephen A. Samaha & Wagner A. Kamakura, 2008. "Assessing the Market Value of Real Estate Property with a Geographically Weighted Stochastic Frontier Model," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 36(4), pages 717-751, December.
    18. Chattopadhyay, Sudip, 1998. "An Empirical Investigation into the Performance of Ellickson's Random Bidding Model, with an Application to Air Quality Valuation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 292-314, March.
    19. Cristián Mardones, 2006. "Impacto de la Percepción de la Calidad del Aire sobre el Precio de las Viviendas en Concepción-Talcahuano, Chile," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 43(128), pages 301-330.
    20. Zhuo Chen & Seong-Hoon Cho & Neelam Poudyal & Roland K. Roberts, 2009. "Forecasting Housing Prices under Different Market Segmentation Assumptions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 167-187, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:21:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11067-021-09520-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.