IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v36y2025i3d10.1007_s11002-025-09773-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does anthropomorphism devalue luxury? The impact of anthropomorphism on consumers’ evaluations of luxury products

Author

Listed:
  • Lingling Wen

    (Xiamen University)

  • Yanli Jia

    (Xiamen University)

Abstract

While many retailers employ anthropomorphism strategies in marketing practice, this research identifies a negative impact of anthropomorphism in luxury domains. Across four studies, our results show that consumers have a lower value perception for a luxury product when the product is anthropomorphized than when it is not. This effect occurs because consumers perceive themselves to be psychologically close with the anthropomorphized product, which is inconsistent with the “distance-create-prestige” common belief in luxury, thereby reducing their value perception of the product. Consequently, this effect is attenuated when consumers’ psychological distance with the product can be created in other ways (e.g., visual boundary) and is reversed for popular mainstream products. Moreover, while anthropomorphism consistently reduces value perception in luxury domains, regardless of consumer affordability, it hinders actual purchases only for consumers who find luxury goods affordable. These findings contribute to the literature on anthropomorphism and luxury consumption and offer important managerial implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingling Wen & Yanli Jia, 2025. "Does anthropomorphism devalue luxury? The impact of anthropomorphism on consumers’ evaluations of luxury products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 621-635, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11002-025-09773-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-025-09773-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-025-09773-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-025-09773-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11002-025-09773-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.