IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v36y2025i1d10.1007_s11002-024-09734-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too much of a good thing? High volumes of positive WOM can undermine adopters of new technology products

Author

Listed:
  • David L. Alexander

    (University of St. Thomas)

  • Sarah G. Moore

    (University of Alberta)

Abstract

We explore how first-time adopters of complex new technology products are influenced by the volume of positive WOM that they receive prior to adoption. Such positive WOM can flow through to alter adopter’s goals during initial product use, with consequences for their usage experiences and strategies. Two longitudinal surveys and an experiment reveal a potential downside of positive WOM. Specifically, receiving a greater volume of positive WOM about a new technology product can establish normative standards for adopter’s performance during product use. This leads adopters to feel pressure to meet those standards, prompting avoidance-oriented performance goals for initial use of their new product. Together, these processes undermine adopter’s experiences with their new product, as well as their strategies for using it. Our findings offer insights for marketers and researchers by identifying and explaining an ironic post-adoption effect of PWOM. Too much of a good thing? High volumes of positive WOM can undermine adopters of new technology products.

Suggested Citation

  • David L. Alexander & Sarah G. Moore, 2025. "Too much of a good thing? High volumes of positive WOM can undermine adopters of new technology products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 121-136, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09734-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-024-09734-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-024-09734-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-024-09734-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madhavan Parthasarathy & Anol Bhattacherjee, 1998. "Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 362-379, December.
    2. Madhavan Parthasarathy & Walfried Lassar, 2023. "The adoption and disadoption of electric vehicles by innovators," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 549-573, December.
    3. Stephen X. He & Samuel D. Bond, 2015. "Why Is the Crowd Divided? Attribution for Dispersion in Online Word of Mouth," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1509-1527.
    4. R Dustin Harding & Diogo Hildebrand & Thomas Kramer & Jannine D Lasaleta & Vicki G MorwitzEditor & Amna KirmaniEditor & Chris JaniszewskiAssociate Editor, 2019. "The Impact of Acquisition Mode on Expected Speed of Product Mastery and Subsequent Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(1), pages 140-158.
    5. Moldovan, Sarit & Goldenberg, Jacob & Chattopadhyay, Amitava, 2011. "The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating word-of-mouth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 109-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ina Garnefeld & Sabrina Helm & Ann-Kathrin Grötschel, 2020. "May we buy your love? psychological effects of incentives on writing likelihood and valence of online product reviews," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(4), pages 805-820, December.
    2. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Minnema, Alec & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Gensler, Sonja & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2016. "To Keep or Not to Keep: Effects of Online Customer Reviews on Product Returns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 253-267.
    4. Juthamon Sithipolvanichgul & Charlie Chen & Judy Land & Peter Ractham, 2021. "Enhancing User Experiences with Cloud Computing via Improving Utilitarian and Hedonic Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    6. Bella Rozenkrants & S Christian Wheeler & Baba Shiv & Gita JoharEditor & Derek RuckerAssociate Editor, 2017. "Self-Expression Cues in Product Rating Distributions: When People Prefer Polarizing Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 759-777.
    7. Philp, Matthew & Ashworth, Laurence, 2020. "I should have known better!: When firm-caused failure leads to self-image concerns and reduces negative word-of-mouth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 283-293.
    8. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:363-381. is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Back, Camila & Spann, Martin, 2022. "The Impact of Uncertainty on Customer Satisfaction," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 343, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    10. Netsanet Haile & Jörn Altmann, 2016. "Structural analysis of value creation in software service platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 129-142, May.
    11. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Steffen Zimmermann & Dennis Kundisch & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Design of Review Systems - A Strategic Instrument to shape Online Review Behavior and Economic Outcomes," Working Papers Dissertations 42, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    12. Barta, Sergio & Belanche, Daniel & Fernández, Ana & Flavián, Marta, 2023. "Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Elvira Ismagilova & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1203-1226, October.
    14. He, Yi & You, Ya & Chen, Qimei, 2020. "Our conditional love for the underdog: The effect of brand positioning and the lay theory of achievement on WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 210-222.
    15. Maksym Koghut & Omar AI-Tabbaa, 2021. "Exploring Consumers’ Discontinuance Intention of Remote Mobile Payments during Post-Adoption Usage: An Empirical Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-33, February.
    16. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    17. Nguyen, Hang T. & Chaudhuri, Malika, 2019. "Making new products go viral and succeed," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 39-62.
    18. Zhuolan Bao & Wenwen Li & Pengzhen Yin & Michael Chau, 2021. "Examining the impact of review tag function on product evaluation and information perception of popular products," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 517-539, June.
    19. Lerbin R. Aritonang R., 2014. "Student Loyalty Modeling," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 26(1), pages 77-91.
    20. Dominik Gutt, 2018. "In the Eye of the Beholder? Empirically Decomposing Different Economic Implications of the Online Rating Variance," Working Papers Dissertations 40, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    21. Habib Ntwoku & Solomon Negash & Peter Meso, 2017. "ICT adoption in Cameroon SME: application of Bass diffusion model," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 296-317, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09734-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.