IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jrisku/v70y2025i3d10.1007_s11166-025-09457-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of risk attitudes: A panel study of the university years

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Eckel

    (Texas A&M University)

  • Rick Wilson

    (Rice University)

  • Nanyin Yang

    (University of Sydney)

Abstract

We analyze a unique longitudinal dataset of university students to investigate the stability of risk preferences over a five-year period. Our findings indicate that subjects’ risk tolerance, as measured by incentivized lottery choices, tends to increase over time, while it moves in the opposite direction when assessed through a non-incentivized survey question. Furthermore, we exploit the COVID-19 pandemic to explore the impact of negative experiences and emotions on the temporal changes in subjects’ risk preferences. Our analysis reveals that, within the same group of respondents, the risk tolerance elicited by the incentivized measure proves to be more stable, whereas the survey measure exhibits greater sensitivity, declining in response to negative shocks. These results enhance our understanding of how risk preferences evolve over time and emphasize the importance of employing appropriate measurement methods when investigating risk attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Eckel & Rick Wilson & Nanyin Yang, 2025. "The evolution of risk attitudes: A panel study of the university years," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 225-248, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:70:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11166-025-09457-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11166-025-09457-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11166-025-09457-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11166-025-09457-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk preferences; Incentivized and non-incentivized risk-preference measures; COVID-19; Emotions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C9 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:70:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11166-025-09457-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.